Şeneş Mehmet, Alpdemir Medine, Kırtıl Gül, Öğüş Elmas, Çolak Samsum Emel, Alpdemir Mehmet Fatih
Medical Biochemistry, University of Health Sciences Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Medical Biochemistry, Ministry of Health Pursaklar State Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2022 Dec 30;61(6):1054-1064. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0955. Print 2023 May 25.
This study aims to investigate the effect of natural ultralipemic material (NULM) and intravenous lipid emulsion (IVLE) on capillary serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP).
NULM material was prepared from leftover patients' lipemic serum sample (triglyceride concentration >2,000 mg/dL) pool by a refrigerated high-speed centrifuge, and IVLE Omegaven lipid emulsion (30%) was used. Serum pools for interference study were prepared from patient samples for which serum protein electrophoresis was studied as Normal SPEP and M Peak SPEP. For both types of lipemia (DULM and IVLE), five pools with triglyceride concentrations of ∼4.52 mmol/L, ∼7.91 mmol/L, ∼14.69 mmol/L, ∼21.47 mmol/L, and ∼28.25 mmol/L were prepared. SPEP was studied in each pool with Sebia Capillarys Minicap. A repeated measure ANOVA test was used to determine the difference between the pools, and interferograms were used to evaluate the interference effect.
Interference was not detected in IVLE added Normal SPEP and M Peak SPEP pools, either % or concentrations of fractions. In NULM-added Normal SPEP and M Peak SPEP pools, significant positive interference in albumin % (p=0.002 and p<0.001 respectively) and significant negative interference in gamma% (p<0.001 and p=0.005 respectively) and M protein peak (p=0.002) fractions were detected. However, significant positive interference was seen only for albumin concentration fractions (p<0.001 for both pools).
It is vital to use NULM instead of IVLE solutions in lipemia interference studies for all laboratory tests, including CZE SPEP. The fractions concentration values calculated with the total protein concentration should be used for evaluating SPEP results.
本研究旨在探讨天然高脂血症物质(NULM)和静脉脂质乳剂(IVLE)对毛细血管血清蛋白电泳(SPEP)的影响。
通过冷冻高速离心机从剩余患者高脂血症血清样本(甘油三酯浓度>2000mg/dL)池中制备NULM物质,并使用IVLE Omegaven脂质乳剂(30%)。用于干扰研究的血清池由患者样本制备,这些样本的血清蛋白电泳研究结果为正常SPEP和M峰SPEP。对于两种类型的脂血症(DULM和IVLE),制备了五个甘油三酯浓度分别约为4.52mmol/L、7.91mmol/L、14.69mmol/L、21.47mmol/L和28.25mmol/L的血清池。使用Sebia Capillarys Minicap对每个血清池进行SPEP研究。采用重复测量方差分析检验确定各血清池之间的差异,并使用干涉图评估干扰效果。
在添加IVLE的正常SPEP和M峰SPEP血清池中,无论是各组分的百分比还是浓度,均未检测到干扰。在添加NULM的正常SPEP和M峰SPEP血清池中,检测到白蛋白百分比有显著正干扰(分别为p=0.002和p<0.001),γ球蛋白百分比有显著负干扰(分别为p<0.001和p=0.005),以及M蛋白峰组分有显著负干扰(p=0.002)。然而,仅在白蛋白浓度组分中观察到显著正干扰(两个血清池均为p<0.001)。
在包括毛细管区带电泳SPEP在内的所有实验室检测的脂血症干扰研究中,使用NULM而非IVLE溶液至关重要。应使用根据总蛋白浓度计算的各组分浓度值来评估SPEP结果。