Motono Nozomu, Mizoguchi Takaki, Ishikawa Masahito, Iwai Shun, Iijima Yoshihito, Uramoto Hidetaka
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University, 1-1 Daigaku, Uchinada, Ishikawa, 920-0293, Japan.
Lung. 2023 Feb;201(1):95-101. doi: 10.1007/s00408-022-00593-4. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
Although targeting programmed death-1 (PD-1) and its ligand, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), is an established treatment modality for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the prognostic relevance of PD-L1 expression in NSCLC patients who undergo pulmonary resection is controversial.
Two hundred thirty-seven NSCLC patients who underwent pulmonary resection were enrolled and the relationship between PD-L1 and various clinicopathological factors, as well as the prognostic relevance of PD-L1, was evaluated.
PD-L1 expression was significantly higher in male patients (p < 0.01), lymphatic invasion (p < 0.01), vascular invasion (p < 0.01), grade 3-4 differentiation (p < 0.01), squamous cell carcinoma (p < 0.01), and pathological stage > II (p < 0.01), but significantly lower in those who were epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation negative (p < 0.01). Relapse-free survival was significantly worse in patients with PD-L1 expression (p = 0.04). Univariate analysis showed that male sex (p = 0.04), carcinoembryonic antigen expression (CEA) (p < 0.01), maximum standardized uptake value (p < 0.01), lymphatic invasion (p < 0.01), vascular invasion (p < 0.01), grade 3-4 differentiation (p < 0.01), lower lobe disease (p = 0.04), PD-L1 expression (p = 0.03), and pathological stage (p < 0.01) were significant risk factors of recurrence. In multivariate analysis, CEA expression (p = 0.01), lymphatic invasion (p = 0.04), and pathological stage (p < 0.01) were risk factors for recurrence, whereas PD-L1 expression was not a significant factor of recurrence (p = 0.62).
PD-L1 expression was not a risk factor of recurrence but tumor progression tended to increase PD-L1 expression.
The Institutional Review Board of Kanazawa Medical University approved the protocol of this retrospective study (approval number: I392), and written informed consent was obtained from all patients.
尽管靶向程序性死亡蛋白1(PD-1)及其配体程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)是一种已确立的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)治疗方式,但PD-L1表达在接受肺切除的NSCLC患者中的预后相关性仍存在争议。
纳入237例行肺切除的NSCLC患者,评估PD-L1与各种临床病理因素之间的关系以及PD-L1的预后相关性。
男性患者(p < 0.01)、淋巴侵犯(p < 0.01)、血管侵犯(p < 0.01)、3-4级分化(p < 0.01)、鳞状细胞癌(p < 0.01)及病理分期> II期(p < 0.01)患者的PD-L1表达显著更高,但表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变阴性患者的PD-L1表达显著更低(p < 0.01)。PD-L1表达患者的无复发生存期显著更差(p = 0.04)。单因素分析显示,男性(p = 0.04)、癌胚抗原表达(CEA)(p < 0.01)、最大标准化摄取值(p < 0.01)、淋巴侵犯(p < 0.01)、血管侵犯(p < 0.01)、3-4级分化(p < 0.01)、下叶病变(p = 0.04)、PD-L1表达(p = 0.03)及病理分期(p < 0.01)是复发的显著危险因素。多因素分析显示,CEA表达(p = 0.01)、淋巴侵犯(p = 0.04)及病理分期(p < 0.01)是复发的危险因素,而PD-L1表达不是复发的显著因素(p = 0.62)。
PD-L1表达不是复发的危险因素,但肿瘤进展倾向于增加PD-L1表达。
金泽医科大学机构审查委员会批准了这项回顾性研究方案(批准号:I392),并获得了所有患者的书面知情同意。