University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2023 May;36(5):533-542.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2022.12.016. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
Although increased left ventricular (LV) mass is associated with adverse outcomes, measured values vary widely depending on the specific technique used. Moreover, the impact of sex, age, and race on LV mass remains controversial, further limiting the clinical use of this parameter. Accordingly, the authors studied LV mass using a variety of two-dimensional and three-dimensional echocardiographic techniques in a large population of normal subjects encompassing a wide range of ages.
Transthoracic echocardiograms obtained from 1,854 healthy adult subjects (52% men) enrolled in the World Alliance Societies of Echocardiography (WASE) Normal Values Study, were divided into three age groups (young, 18-35 years; middle aged, 36-55 years; and old, >55 years). LV mass was obtained using five conventional techniques, including linear and two-dimensional methods, as well as direct three-dimensional measurement. All LV mass values were indexed to body surface area, and differences according to sex, age, and race were analyzed for each technique.
LV mass values differed significantly among the five techniques. Three-dimensional measurements were considerably smaller than those obtained using the other techniques and were closer to magnetic resonance imaging normal values reported in the literature. For all techniques, LV mass in men was significantly larger than in women, with and without body surface area indexing. These technique- and sex-related differences were larger than measurement variability. In women, age differences in LV mass were more pronounced and depicted significantly larger values in older age groups for all techniques, except three-dimensional echocardiography, which showed essentially no differences. LV mass was overall larger in black subjects than in white or Asian subjects.
Significant differences in LV mass values exist across echocardiographic techniques, which are therefore not interchangeable. Sex-, race-, and age-related differences underscore the need for separate population specific normal values.
虽然左心室(LV)质量的增加与不良预后相关,但由于具体使用的技术不同,测量值差异很大。此外,LV 质量与性别、年龄和种族的关系仍存在争议,这进一步限制了该参数的临床应用。因此,作者使用各种二维和三维超声心动图技术在涵盖广泛年龄范围的大量正常受试者中研究了 LV 质量。
从参加世界超声心动图联盟(WASE)正常数值研究的 1854 名健康成年受试者(52%为男性)中获得经胸超声心动图,将其分为三个年龄组(年轻组,18-35 岁;中年组,36-55 岁;老年组,>55 岁)。使用五种常规技术获得 LV 质量,包括线性和二维方法以及直接三维测量。所有 LV 质量值均按体表面积进行索引,并分析了每种技术的性别、年龄和种族差异。
五种技术的 LV 质量值存在显著差异。三维测量值明显小于其他技术的测量值,且更接近文献中报道的磁共振成像正常值。对于所有技术,男性的 LV 质量均明显大于女性,无论是否进行体表面积索引。这些与技术和性别相关的差异大于测量变异性。在女性中,LV 质量的年龄差异更为明显,除三维超声心动图外,所有技术的年龄较大组的 LV 质量值均显著增大,而三维超声心动图则显示基本无差异。与白种人和亚洲人相比,黑种人的 LV 质量总体上更大。
超声心动图技术之间存在 LV 质量值的显著差异,因此它们不能互换使用。性别、种族和年龄相关的差异强调了需要针对特定人群制定单独的正常值。