Department of Political Science & Criminal Justice, California State University, Chico, California, USA.
Department of Family Medicine, UNC-Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Apr;71(4):1259-1266. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18166. Epub 2022 Dec 31.
Primary care is essential for persons with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). Prior research suggests that the propensity to provide high-quality, continuous primary care varies by provider setting, but the settings used by Medicare-Medicaid dual-eligibles with ADRD have not been described at the population level.
Using 2012-2018 Medicare data, we identified dual-eligibles with ADRD. For each person-year, we identified primary care visits occurring in six settings. We calculated descriptive statistics for beneficiaries with a majority of visits in each setting, and conducted a k-means cluster analysis to determine utilization patterns, using the standardized count of primary care visits in each setting.
Each year from 2012 to 2018, at least 45.6% of dual-eligibles with ADRD received a majority of their primary care in nursing facilities, while at least 25.2% did so in physician offices. Over time, the share relying on nursing facilities for primary care decreased by 5.2 percentage points, offset by growth in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and miscellaneous settings (2.3 percentage points each). Dual-eligibles relying on nursing facilities had more annual primary care visits (16.1) than those relying on other settings (range: 6.8-10.7 visits). Interpersonal care continuity was also higher in nursing facilities (97.0%) and physician offices (87.9%) than in FQHCs (54.2%), rural health clinics (RHCs, 46.6%), or hospital-based clinics (56.8%). Among dual-eligibles without care continuity, 82.7% were assigned to a cluster with few primary care visits.
A trend toward care in different settings likely reflects improved access to patient-centered primary care. Low rates of interpersonal care continuity in FQHCs, RHCs, and physician offices may warrant concern, unless providers in these settings function as a care team. Nonetheless, every healthcare system encounter presents an opportunity to designate a primary care provider for dual-eligibles with ADRD who use little or no primary care.
初级保健对于患有阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症(ADRD)的人至关重要。先前的研究表明,提供高质量、持续初级保健的倾向因提供者的设置而异,但尚未在人群水平上描述 Medicare-Medicaid 双重资格的 ADRD 患者使用的设置。
使用 2012-2018 年的 Medicare 数据,我们确定了患有 ADRD 的双重资格者。对于每一个人年,我们确定了发生在六个设置中的初级保健就诊。我们计算了每个设置中大多数就诊的受益人的描述性统计数据,并使用每个设置的初级保健就诊标准化计数进行了 k-均值聚类分析以确定利用模式。
2012 年至 2018 年的每一年,至少有 45.6%的患有 ADRD 的双重资格者在疗养院获得了大部分初级保健,而至少有 25.2%的人在医生办公室获得了大部分初级保健。随着时间的推移,依赖疗养院进行初级保健的比例下降了 5.2 个百分点,而联邦合格的健康中心(FQHC)和其他各类机构(各增长 2.3 个百分点)的比例则有所上升。依赖疗养院的双重资格者的年度初级保健就诊次数(16.1 次)多于依赖其他设置的就诊次数(范围:6.8-10.7 次)。疗养院(97.0%)和医生办公室(87.9%)的人际护理连续性也高于 FQHC(54.2%)、农村卫生诊所(RHC,46.6%)或医院诊所(56.8%)。在没有护理连续性的双重资格者中,82.7%被分配到一个初级保健就诊次数较少的聚类中。
在不同设置中进行护理的趋势可能反映了获得以患者为中心的初级保健的机会增加。在 FQHC、RHC 和医生办公室中,人际护理连续性较低可能令人担忧,除非这些设置中的提供者作为一个护理团队运作。尽管如此,每一次医疗保健系统的接触都为为很少或根本不使用初级保健的 ADRD 双重资格者指定初级保健提供者提供了机会。