Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Dec;11(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002075.
Diagnostic imaging for low back pain (LBP) without any indication of a serious underlying cause does not improve patient outcomes. However, there is still overuse of imaging, especially at emergency departments (EDs). Although evidence-based guidelines for LBP and radicular pain management exist, a protocol for use at the ED in the Belgian University Hospitals Leuven was not available, resulting in high practice variation. The present paper aims to describe the process from protocol development to the iterative implementation approach and explore how it has influenced practice.
In accordance with a modified 'knowledge-to-action' framework, five steps took place within the iterative bottom-up implementation process: (1) identification of the situation that requires the implementation of evidence based recommendations, (2) context analysis, (3) development of an implementation plan, (4) evaluation and (5) sustainability of the implemented practice recommendations. Two potential barriers were identified: the high turnover of attending specialists at the ED and patients' and general practicioners' expectations that might overrule the protocol. These were tackled by educational sessions for staff, patient brochures, an information campaign and symposium for general practitioners.
The rate of imaging of the lumbar spine decreased from over 25% of patients to 15.0%-16.4% for CT scans and 19.0%-21.8% for X-rays after implementation, but started to fluctuate again after 3 years. After introducing a compulsory e-learning before rotation and catchy posters in the ED staff rooms, rates decreased to 14.0%-14.6% for CT scan use and 12.7-13.5% for X-ray use.
Implementation of a new protocol in a tertiary hospital ED with high turn over of rotating trainees is a challenge and requires ongoing efforts to ensure sustainability. Rates of imaging represent an indirect though useful indicator. We have demonstrated that it is possible to implement a protocol that includes demedicalisation in an ED environment and to observe changes in indicator results.
对于没有任何严重潜在病因的腰痛(LBP)患者,进行诊断性影像学检查并不能改善患者的预后。然而,影像学检查的过度使用仍然存在,尤其是在急诊科(ED)。尽管有针对 LBP 和神经根痛管理的循证指南,但比利时鲁汶大学医院的 ED 中没有使用该指南的协议,导致实践差异较大。本文旨在描述从协议制定到迭代实施方法的过程,并探讨其对实践的影响。
根据改良的“知识转化为行动”框架,迭代式自下而上的实施过程包括五个步骤:(1)确定需要实施基于证据的推荐的情况,(2)背景分析,(3)制定实施计划,(4)评估,(5)实施实践推荐的可持续性。确定了两个潜在障碍:ED 中主治医生的高周转率以及患者和全科医生的期望,这可能会推翻协议。通过对员工进行教育课程、患者宣传册、信息宣传和全科医生研讨会来解决这些问题。
实施后,腰椎 CT 扫描的使用率从 25%以上降至 15.0%-16.4%,X 射线的使用率从 19.0%-21.8%降至 15.0%-16.4%,但 3 年后又开始波动。在 ED 员工休息室引入强制性电子学习和引人注目的海报后,CT 扫描使用率降至 14.0%-14.6%,X 射线使用率降至 12.7-13.5%。
在轮转培训医生周转率较高的三级医院 ED 中实施新协议是一项挑战,需要持续努力以确保可持续性。影像学检查的使用率是一个间接但有用的指标。我们已经证明,在 ED 环境中实施包括去医学化的协议并观察指标结果的变化是可行的。