Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Physiotherapy Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Oct;30(10):825-835. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012337. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
Overuse of lumbar imaging is common in the emergency department (ED). Few trials have examined interventions to address this. We evaluated the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to implement guideline recommendations for low back pain in the emergency department.
We conducted a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial in four EDs in New South Wales, Australia. After a 13-month control phase of usual care, the EDs received a multifaceted intervention to support guideline-endorsed care in a random order, based on a computer-generated random sequence, every 4 weeks over a 4-month period. All sites were followed up for at least 3 months. The primary outcome was the proportion of low back pain presentations receiving lumbar imaging. Secondary healthcare utilisation outcomes included prescriptions of opioid and non-opioid pain medicines, inpatient admissions, length of ED stay, specialist referrals and re-presentations. Clinician beliefs and knowledge about low back pain care were measured before and after the intervention. Patient-reported pain, disability, quality of life and satisfaction were measured at 1, 2 and 4 weeks post ED presentation.
A total of 269 ED clinicians and 4625 episodes of care for low back pain (4491 patients) were included. The data did not provide clear evidence that the intervention reduced lumbar imaging (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.47 to 1.26; p=0.29). It did reduce opioid use (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.85; p=0.006) and improved clinicians' beliefs (mean difference (MD), 2.85; 95% CI 1.85 to 3.85; p<0.001; on a scale from 9 to 45) and knowledge about low back pain care (MD, 0.48; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.83; p<0.01; on a scale from 0 to 11). There was no difference in pain scores at 1-week follow-up (MD, 0.04; 95% CI -1.00 to 1.08; p=0.94; on a scale from 0 to 10). A similar trend was observed for all other patient-reported outcomes and time points. This study found no effect on the other secondary healthcare utilisation outcomes.
It is uncertain if a multifaceted intervention to implement guideline recommendations for low back pain care decreased lumbar imaging in the ED; however, it did reduce opioid prescriptions without adversely affecting patient outcomes. ACTRN12617001160325.
在急诊科(ED)中,过度使用腰椎成像很常见。很少有试验研究过解决此问题的干预措施。我们评估了一种多方面干预措施在急诊科实施腰痛指南建议的有效性。
我们在澳大利亚新南威尔士州的四个急诊科进行了一项阶梯式、群组随机试验。在常规护理的 13 个月对照阶段后,急诊科根据计算机生成的随机序列,以每 4 周一次的随机顺序,在 4 个月内分阶段接受多方面干预措施,以支持经指南认可的护理。所有地点的随访时间至少为 3 个月。主要结局是接受腰椎成像的腰痛就诊比例。次要医疗保健利用结局包括阿片类药物和非阿片类药物疼痛药物的处方、住院入院、急诊科留观时间、专科转介和再就诊。在干预前后测量临床医生对腰痛护理的信念和知识。在 ED 就诊后 1、2 和 4 周测量患者报告的疼痛、残疾、生活质量和满意度。
共纳入 269 名 ED 临床医生和 4625 例腰痛就诊(4491 名患者)。数据并未提供明确证据表明干预措施减少了腰椎成像(OR 0.77;95%CI 0.47 至 1.26;p=0.29)。它确实减少了阿片类药物的使用(OR 0.57;95%CI 0.38 至 0.85;p=0.006),并改善了临床医生的信念(平均差异(MD),2.85;95%CI 1.85 至 3.85;p<0.001;在 9 到 45 的量表上)和对腰痛护理的知识(MD,0.48;95%CI 0.13 至 0.83;p<0.01;在 0 到 11 的量表上)。在 1 周随访时,疼痛评分无差异(MD,0.04;95%CI -1.00 至 1.08;p=0.94;在 0 到 10 的量表上)。所有其他患者报告的结局和时间点也观察到类似的趋势。这项研究发现,该干预措施对其他次要医疗保健利用结局没有影响。
尚不确定多方面干预措施实施腰痛护理指南建议是否会减少 ED 中的腰椎成像;然而,它确实减少了阿片类药物的处方,而没有对患者结局产生不利影响。ACTRN12617001160325。