Suppr超能文献

基于移动设备的认知训练程序DoBrain对有或无发育障碍学龄前儿童的疗效:一项随机、单盲、活性对照试验。

Efficacy of Mobile-Based Cognitive Training Program DoBrain in Preschool Children With or Without Developmental Disabilities: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Active-Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Lee Taeyeop, Kim Seonok, Kim Jichul, Park Kee Jeong, Kim Hyo-Won

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Psychiatry Investig. 2022 Dec;19(12):1000-1011. doi: 10.30773/pi.2022.0136. Epub 2022 Dec 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Mobile-based cognitive training programs can be a viable alternative to in-person interventions, but their efficacies have not been established yet. In this study, we examined the efficacy of DoBrain, a mobile-based cognitive training program designed for children with developmental disabilities (DDs), in comparison with general educational apps named Junior Naver and Kakao Kids.

METHODS

Children aged 34 to 77 months were recruited and randomized at a 1:1 ratio to use DoBrain or general educational apps. Each group used the assigned app on a daily basis at home for 30 minutes for 24 weeks. Parents were instructed to help the children with the app usage. A total of 166 children completed the post-test visit (DoBrain group, n=85, 55.4±8.7 months old; general educational app group, n=81, 53.7±9.9 months old). The primary outcome was cognitive development measured by Psychoeducational Profile-Revised (PEP-R), administered at baseline and at post-test.

RESULTS

DoBrain had no superior effect over general educational apps on the PEP-R Developmental Quotient. When the changes before and after app usage were compared, the DoBrain group and the general educational app group both showed declines in imitation (adjusted p=0.049 and 0.022), perception (adjusted p=0.004 and <0.001), and gross motor (adjusted p=0.003 and 0.002) domains of the PEP-R. Among the DoBrain group, children with DD showed a significantly greater gain in the eye-hand coordination domain of PEP-R compared with those without DD (adjusted p=0.047).

CONCLUSION

DoBrain did not show a superior effect over general educational apps on overall cognitive development in preschool children, regardless of the presence of DD. Careful monitoring of the negative effect of mobile-based cognitive training programs is necessary.

摘要

目的

基于移动设备的认知训练项目可能是面对面干预的可行替代方案,但其效果尚未得到证实。在本研究中,我们将一款专为发育障碍(DD)儿童设计的基于移动设备的认知训练程序DoBrain与名为Junior Naver和Kakao Kids的普通教育应用程序进行了比较,以检验其效果。

方法

招募了年龄在34至77个月之间的儿童,并以1:1的比例随机分组,分别使用DoBrain或普通教育应用程序。每组儿童在家中每天使用指定的应用程序30分钟,持续24周。家长需指导孩子使用应用程序。共有166名儿童完成了测试后访视(DoBrain组,n = 85,年龄55.4±8.7个月;普通教育应用程序组,n = 81,年龄53.7±9.9个月)。主要结局指标是通过在基线和测试后进行的心理教育量表修订版(PEP-R)测量的认知发展。

结果

在PEP-R发育商数方面,DoBrain并不比普通教育应用程序有更显著的效果。比较应用程序使用前后的变化时,DoBrain组和普通教育应用程序组在PEP-R的模仿(校正p = 0.049和0.022)、感知(校正p = 0.004和<0.001)以及大运动(校正p = 0.003和0.002)领域均出现下降。在DoBrain组中,患有DD的儿童在PEP-R的眼手协调领域的进步显著大于未患DD 的儿童(校正p = 0.047)。

结论

无论是否患有DD,DoBrain在学龄前儿童的整体认知发展方面并不比普通教育应用程序有更显著的效果。有必要仔细监测基于移动设备的认知训练项目的负面影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c831/9806509/5d89b3b4249f/pi-2022-0136f1.jpg

相似文献

5
The Use and Effectiveness of Mobile Apps for Depression: Results From a Fully Remote Clinical Trial.
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Dec 20;18(12):e330. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6482.
8
Data Collection Practices of Mobile Applications Played by Preschool-Aged Children.
JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Dec 1;174(12):e203345. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.3345. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
10
Can PEP-3 Provide a Cognitive Profile in Children with ASD? A Comparison Between the Developmental Ages of PEP-3 and IQ of Leiter-R.
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2016 Nov;29(6):566-573. doi: 10.1111/jar.12216. Epub 2015 Oct 6.

本文引用的文献

4
Fundamental motor skills, screen-time, and physical activity in preschoolers.
J Sport Health Sci. 2019 Mar;8(2):114-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2018.11.006. Epub 2018 Nov 24.
5
Randomized Trial of a Computer-Assisted Intervention for Children With Autism in Schools.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Mar;59(3):373-380. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.03.029. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
6
Controversies in Computerized Cognitive Training.
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2018 Nov;3(11):907-915. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2018.06.008. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
8
Brain Training in Children and Adolescents: Is It Scientifically Valid?
Front Psychol. 2018 May 4;9:565. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00565. eCollection 2018.
9
Clinical and psychological effects of excessive screen time on children.
J Paediatr Child Health. 2017 Apr;53(4):333-338. doi: 10.1111/jpc.13462. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
10
Do "Brain-Training" Programs Work?
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2016 Oct;17(3):103-186. doi: 10.1177/1529100616661983.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验