Suppr超能文献

腕管干预安全区的超声评估:健康个体与腕管综合征患者的比较

Ultrasonographic Assessment of the Safe Zone for Carpal Tunnel Intervention: A Comparison Between Healthy Individuals and Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

作者信息

Kang Byung Heon, Woo Sang Rok, Park Hyun Jin, Chung Seong Yun, Kang Seok, Jeong Seong-Ho, Yoon Joon Shik

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Goodbone Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinic, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Rehabil Med. 2022 Dec;46(6):284-291. doi: 10.5535/arm.22123. Epub 2022 Dec 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare transverse and longitudinal safe zones using ultrasonography between healthy individuals and patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

METHODS

This was a prospective observational case-control study. Forty wrists from 20 healthy individuals and 40 wrists from 24 patients with CTS were examined. Patients with CTS were classified into three groups (mild, moderate, and severe CTS) based on electrodiagnostic findings. Using ultrasonography, we measured the distance between the median nerve and ulnar vessels to identify the transverse safe zone, and between the distal flexor retinaculum and superficial palmar artery arch to identify the longitudinal safe zone.

RESULTS

The transverse and longitudinal safe zones were significantly different between participants with CTS and those without CTS. The transverse safe zone significantly differed between the mild and severe CTS groups, while the longitudinal safe zone was not significantly different between the groups. The cross-sectional area of the median nerve negatively correlated with the transverse and longitudinal safe zones.

CONCLUSION

Transverse and longitudinal safe zones were narrower in patients with CTS than in the healthy group. A significant difference was observed between patients with mild CTS and those with severe CTS. Furthermore, the cross-sectional area of the median nerve was directly proportional to the degree of narrowing of the transverse and longitudinal safe zones.

摘要

目的

运用超声检查比较健康个体与腕管综合征(CTS)患者的横向和纵向安全区。

方法

这是一项前瞻性观察性病例对照研究。对20名健康个体的40只手腕以及24名CTS患者的40只手腕进行了检查。根据电诊断结果,CTS患者被分为三组(轻度、中度和重度CTS)。通过超声检查,我们测量了正中神经与尺侧血管之间的距离以确定横向安全区,以及远侧屈肌支持带与掌浅动脉弓之间的距离以确定纵向安全区。

结果

CTS患者与非CTS患者之间的横向和纵向安全区存在显著差异。轻度和重度CTS组之间的横向安全区存在显著差异,而各组之间的纵向安全区无显著差异。正中神经的横截面积与横向和纵向安全区呈负相关。

结论

CTS患者的横向和纵向安全区比健康组更窄。轻度CTS患者与重度CTS患者之间观察到显著差异。此外,正中神经的横截面积与横向和纵向安全区的狭窄程度成正比。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cd1/9810651/e052fe5c6323/arm-22123f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验