• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

局部晚期鼻咽癌两种标准治疗方法的比较

Comparison of Two Standard Treatment Approaches in Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

作者信息

Mohamad Issa, Abu-Hijleh Fawzi, Mayta Ebrahim, Abu-Hejleh Taher, Al-Gargaz Wisam, Al Mousa Abdellatif, Abu-Hijlih Ramiz, Hosni Ali

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.

Department of Surgical Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.

出版信息

South Asian J Cancer. 2022 Feb 27;11(3):223-228. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1742724. eCollection 2022 Jul.

DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1742724
PMID:36588606
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9803531/
Abstract

Issa Mohamad  To compare outcomes and toxicity of two standard treatment approaches of advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).  Between 2010 and 2016, patients with NPC, stage II-IVa, treated with induction chemotherapy (IC) (TPF), followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) (induction group), or CCRT, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) (PF) (no-induction group), were retrospectively reviewed. CCRT included platinum-based chemotherapy with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Survival outcomes, the pattern of failures, toxicity, and predictors for survival outcomes were evaluated.  A total of 110 patients were included, 65 in the induction group and 45 in the no-induction group. There were no significant differences in the DFS and overall survival (OS) at 3 years between the two groups. On multivariate analysis, performance status (1 vs. 0) predicted worse OS. The 3-year cumulative incidence rates for local, regional, and distant failures were 58.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.4-89%), 58.00% (95% CI: 8-88.8%), and 63.90% (95% CI: 14.1-90.2%), respectively. IC had more frequent acute grade (G) II anemia (13 vs. 1,  < 0.01), late G II brain toxicity (4 vs. 1,  < 0.01), and late G II dysphagia (32 vs. 11,  = 0.01).  Survival outcomes were comparable between the two groups. IC had more frequent acute G II anemia and late G II brain and esophageal toxicities.

摘要

伊萨·穆罕默德 比较晚期鼻咽癌(NPC)两种标准治疗方法的疗效和毒性。 在2010年至2016年期间,对II-IVa期NPC患者进行回顾性研究,这些患者接受诱导化疗(IC)(TPF方案),随后进行同步放化疗(CCRT)(诱导组),或接受CCRT,随后进行辅助化疗(AC)(PF方案)(非诱导组)。CCRT包括铂类化疗联合调强放疗。评估生存结局、失败模式、毒性以及生存结局的预测因素。 共纳入110例患者,诱导组65例,非诱导组45例。两组3年无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)无显著差异。多因素分析显示,体能状态(1 vs. 0)是OS较差的预测因素。局部、区域和远处失败的3年累积发生率分别为58.5%(95%置信区间[CI]:8.4-89%)、58.00%(95% CI:8-88.8%)和63.90%(95% CI:14.1-90.2%)。IC组急性II级贫血(13例 vs. 1例,P<0.01)、晚期II级脑毒性(4例 vs. 1例,P<0.01)和晚期II级吞咽困难(32例 vs. 11例,P=0.01)更为常见。 两组生存结局相当。IC组急性II级贫血以及晚期II级脑和食管毒性更为常见。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8d8/9803531/9b9cfa538569/10-1055-s-0042-1742724-i2110253-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8d8/9803531/a7cfc65cf8f2/10-1055-s-0042-1742724-i2110253-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8d8/9803531/b0e0abe95f25/10-1055-s-0042-1742724-i2110253-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8d8/9803531/9b9cfa538569/10-1055-s-0042-1742724-i2110253-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8d8/9803531/a7cfc65cf8f2/10-1055-s-0042-1742724-i2110253-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8d8/9803531/b0e0abe95f25/10-1055-s-0042-1742724-i2110253-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8d8/9803531/9b9cfa538569/10-1055-s-0042-1742724-i2110253-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Two Standard Treatment Approaches in Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.局部晚期鼻咽癌两种标准治疗方法的比较
South Asian J Cancer. 2022 Feb 27;11(3):223-228. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1742724. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
Induction chemotherapy plus IMRT alone versus induction chemotherapy plus IMRT-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.局部晚期鼻咽癌诱导化疗加 IMRT 与诱导化疗加基于 IMRT 的同期放化疗的回顾性队列研究。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019 Jul;145(7):1857-1864. doi: 10.1007/s00432-019-02925-z. Epub 2019 May 6.
3
Role of sequential chemoradiotherapy in stage II and low-risk stage III-IV nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy: A propensity score-matched analysis.调强放疗时代,Ⅱ期和低危Ⅲ~Ⅳ期鼻咽癌序贯放化疗的作用:倾向评分匹配分析。
Oral Oncol. 2018 Mar;78:37-45. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
4
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective controlled study.新辅助化疗联合调强放疗与同步放化疗联合辅助化疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌的回顾性对照研究
Chin J Cancer. 2016 Jan 6;35:2. doi: 10.1186/s40880-015-0076-9.
5
The efficacy and safety of docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil (TPF)-based induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a meta-analysis.多西他赛、顺铂和氟尿嘧啶(TPF)为基础的诱导化疗联合同期放化疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2020 Mar;22(3):429-439. doi: 10.1007/s12094-019-02142-7. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
6
Comparing the efficacy of induction-concurrent with concurrent-adjuvant chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.诱导同步与同步辅助化疗在局部晚期鼻咽癌中的疗效比较:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Oncotarget. 2017 Aug 22;8(45):79953-79963. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20389. eCollection 2017 Oct 3.
7
Sequential induction chemotherapy plus intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: the three-year report of a phase II, single center, randomized, non-inferiority trial.序贯诱导化疗加调强放疗与同期放化疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌:一项 II 期、单中心、随机、非劣效性试验的三年报告。
Cancer Med. 2021 Jun;10(12):3886-3895. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3936. Epub 2021 May 6.
8
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with/without induction chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Long-term results of phase 3 randomized controlled trial.同期放化疗联合/不联合诱导化疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌:III 期随机对照临床试验的长期结果。
Int J Cancer. 2019 Jul 1;145(1):295-305. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32099. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
9
Matched analysis of induction chemotherapy plus chemoradiotherapy versus induction chemotherapy plus radiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicenter study.局部晚期鼻咽癌诱导化疗联合放化疗与单纯诱导化疗联合放疗的配对分析:一项多中心研究
Oncotarget. 2017 Feb 21;8(8):14078-14088. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13285.
10
Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: long-term results of a phase III multicentre randomised controlled trial.诱导化疗后同期放化疗与单纯同期放化疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌:III 期多中心随机对照临床试验的长期结果。
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Sep;119:87-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Aug 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus docetaxel and cisplatin as induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma from non-endemic area of China.吉西他滨和顺铂与多西他赛和顺铂作为诱导化疗,随后在非中国鼻咽癌高发地区进行同期放化疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep;146(9):2369-2378. doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03229-3. Epub 2020 May 3.
2
Induction Chemotherapy plus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Endemic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Individual Patient Data Pooled Analysis of Four Randomized Trials.地方性鼻咽癌诱导化疗加同期放化疗:四项随机试验的个体患者数据合并分析。
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Apr 15;24(8):1824-1833. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2656. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
3
Treatment outcomes of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in modern era after intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in Hong Kong: A report of 3328 patients (HKNPCSG 1301 study).香港调强放疗时代鼻咽癌的治疗结果:3328 例患者报告(HKNPCSG 1301 研究)。
Oral Oncol. 2018 Feb;77:16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
4
Peer-assisted Learning: Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy Transition in Developing Countries.同伴辅助学习:发展中国家的调强放射治疗转型
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2017 Oct;29(10):689-695. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
5
The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more "personalized" approach to cancer staging.第八版 AJCC 癌症分期手册:继续从基于人群的方法向更“个体化”的癌症分期方法构建桥梁。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Mar;67(2):93-99. doi: 10.3322/caac.21388. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
6
What Is the Best Treatment of Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma? An Individual Patient Data Network Meta-Analysis.局部晚期鼻咽癌的最佳治疗方法是什么?一项个体患者数据网络荟萃分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb 10;35(5):498-505. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.4119. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
7
Patterns of failure and survival in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯接受调强放射治疗的鼻咽癌患者的失败模式与生存情况
Onco Targets Ther. 2016 Oct 25;9:6561-6567. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S95457. eCollection 2016.
8
Induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a phase 3, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.诱导化疗加同期放化疗对比单纯同期放化疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌:一项 3 期、多中心、随机对照临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Nov;17(11):1509-1520. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30410-7. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
9
Long-term survival analysis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma by plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA levels.基于血浆 Epstein-Barr 病毒 DNA 水平的鼻咽癌患者长期生存分析。
Cancer. 2013 Mar 1;119(5):963-70. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27853. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
10
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial.同期放化疗加辅助化疗与单纯同期放化疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌患者的随机对照 3 期多中心临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Feb;13(2):163-71. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70320-5. Epub 2011 Dec 7.