• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胆囊癌的腹膜后淋巴结转移:与远处转移同样糟糕。

Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Metastasis in Gallbladder Cancer: As Bad as Distant Metastasis.

作者信息

Ghosh Nalini Kanta, Rahul Rahul, Singh Ashish, Sharma Supriya, Kumar Ashok, Singh Rajneesh Kumar, Behari Anu, Kumar Ashok, Kapoor Vinay Kumar, Saxena Rajan

机构信息

Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

出版信息

South Asian J Cancer. 2022 Mar 22;11(3):195-200. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1742595. eCollection 2022 Jul.

DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1742595
PMID:36588607
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9803534/
Abstract

Ashish Singh  Regarding gallbladder cancer (GBC) there is conflicting evidence in the literature whether retroperitoneal lymph nodal metastases (RLNM) should be considered as regional nodal metastasis or as distant metastasis (DM) and the jury is out on radical curative surgery in presence of RLNM. This is an analysis of GBC patients, to see the effect of RLNM on survival and to compare with that of patients with DMs.  A retrospective analysis of a prospective database of patients of GBC with RLNM (interaortocaval and paraaortic) or DM on frozen section biopsy at surgery, between January 2013 and December 2018. Data was analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software (version 22.0). Survival in these two groups (RLNM and DM) was compared with log-rank test. A -value of < 0.05 was considered significant.  A total of 235 patients with ostensibly resectable GBC underwent surgical exploration. The planned curative resection was abandoned in 91 (39%) patients because of RLNM (  = 20, 9%) or DM (  = 71, 30%) on frozen section biopsy. Demographic profile and blood parameters were similar. The median survival for RLNM and DM groups were 5 (range 2-26) and 6 (range 2-24) months, respectively, with no significant difference on log-rank test (  = 0.64). There was no 3-year or longer survivor in either group.  Due to similar poor survival in presence of RLNM or DM, RLNM should be considered as the equivalent of DM. This study strengthens evidence to avoid curative surgery in patients with RLNM. These lymph nodes should be sampled preoperatively, if suspicious on imaging, for fine-needle aspiration cytology and at surgery, as a routine for frozen section histological examination before initiating curative resection to avert a futile exercise.

摘要

阿希什·辛格 关于胆囊癌(GBC),文献中存在相互矛盾的证据,即腹膜后淋巴结转移(RLNM)应被视为区域淋巴结转移还是远处转移(DM),对于存在RLNM的患者是否进行根治性手术尚无定论。这是一项对GBC患者的分析,旨在观察RLNM对生存的影响,并与DM患者进行比较。 对2013年1月至2018年12月期间接受手术时经冰冻切片活检发现有RLNM(主动脉腔间隙和主动脉旁)或DM的GBC患者的前瞻性数据库进行回顾性分析。使用社会科学统计软件包(版本22.0)进行数据分析。采用对数秩检验比较这两组(RLNM和DM)的生存率。P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。 共有235例表面上可切除的GBC患者接受了手术探查。由于冰冻切片活检发现RLNM(n = 20,9%)或DM(n = 71,30%),91例(39%)患者放弃了计划的根治性切除。人口统计学特征和血液参数相似。RLNM组和DM组的中位生存期分别为5个月(范围2 - 26个月)和6个月(范围2 - 24个月),对数秩检验无显著差异(P = 0.64)。两组均无3年或更长时间的幸存者。 由于存在RLNM或DM时生存率相似,RLNM应被视为等同于DM。本研究强化了避免对RLNM患者进行根治性手术的证据。如果影像学检查怀疑这些淋巴结有问题,术前应进行细针穿刺细胞学检查,手术时应常规进行冰冻切片组织学检查,然后再开始根治性切除,以避免徒劳无功。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1859/9803534/d3ba03bcc911/10-1055-s-0042-1742595-i2150418-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1859/9803534/ae9148d8f9bd/10-1055-s-0042-1742595-i2150418-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1859/9803534/78ecf9dc7cdf/10-1055-s-0042-1742595-i2150418-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1859/9803534/e32d2e2a60d8/10-1055-s-0042-1742595-i2150418-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1859/9803534/d3ba03bcc911/10-1055-s-0042-1742595-i2150418-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1859/9803534/ae9148d8f9bd/10-1055-s-0042-1742595-i2150418-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1859/9803534/78ecf9dc7cdf/10-1055-s-0042-1742595-i2150418-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1859/9803534/e32d2e2a60d8/10-1055-s-0042-1742595-i2150418-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1859/9803534/d3ba03bcc911/10-1055-s-0042-1742595-i2150418-3.jpg

相似文献

1
Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Metastasis in Gallbladder Cancer: As Bad as Distant Metastasis.胆囊癌的腹膜后淋巴结转移:与远处转移同样糟糕。
South Asian J Cancer. 2022 Mar 22;11(3):195-200. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1742595. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
Risk factors of regional lymph node (RLN) metastasis among patients with bone sarcoma and survival of patients with RLN-positive bone sarcoma.骨肉瘤患者区域淋巴结(RLN)转移的危险因素及RLN阳性骨肉瘤患者的生存情况。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jan;9(1):48. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4681.
3
Is there any benefit in adding postoperative adjuvant concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for penile cancer with regional lymph node metastasis?对于伴有区域淋巴结转移的阴茎癌,术后辅助同步放化疗是否有获益?
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020 Aug;72(4):474-481. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03387-3. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
4
Prognosis of lymph node metastasis in soft tissue sarcoma.软组织肉瘤淋巴结转移的预后
Ann Surg Oncol. 2004 Jul;11(7):714-9. doi: 10.1245/ASO.2004.04.027.
5
Role of routine 16b1 lymph node biopsy in the management of gallbladder cancer: an analysis.常规 16b1 淋巴结活检在胆囊癌治疗中的作用:分析。
HPB (Oxford). 2014 Mar;16(3):229-34. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12127. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
6
Radical lymph node dissection and assessment: Impact on gallbladder cancer prognosis.根治性淋巴结清扫与评估:对胆囊癌预后的影响。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug 21;19(31):5150-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i31.5150.
7
A Population-based Analysis of Lymph Node Metastasis in Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma: An Update.基于人群的肢体软组织肉瘤淋巴结转移分析:最新进展。
J Surg Res. 2021 Jun;262:121-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.01.005. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
8
Lymph node metastasis after a soft tissue sarcoma of the leg: a case report and a review of the literature.腿部软组织肉瘤后的淋巴结转移:一例病例报告及文献综述
Case Rep Surg. 2013;2013:930361. doi: 10.1155/2013/930361. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
9
Pathological confirmation of para-aortic lymph node status as a potential criterion for the selection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients for radical resection with regional lymph node dissection.腹主动脉旁淋巴结状态的病理确认作为选择肝内胆管癌患者进行区域淋巴结清扫根治性切除的潜在标准。
World J Surg. 2014 Jul;38(7):1763-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2433-7.
10
Long-term survival in patients with para-aortic lymph node metastasis with systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in endometrial carcinoma.系统腹膜后淋巴结清扫术联合辅助化疗治疗子宫内膜癌合并腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移患者的长期生存。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 Aug;20(6):1000-5. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181d80aff.

引用本文的文献

1
How I Manage My Patients with Gall Bladder Cancer?我如何治疗我的胆囊癌患者?
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2024 Dec;15(4):652-660. doi: 10.1007/s13193-024-02008-7. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
2
Gallbladder cancer: Progress in the Indian subcontinent.胆囊癌:印度次大陆的研究进展
World J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jun 24;15(6):695-716. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i6.695.
3
Radical surgery for stage IV gallbladder cancers: Treatment strategies in patients with limited metastatic burden.IV期胆囊癌的根治性手术:转移负担有限患者的治疗策略

本文引用的文献

1
Role of routine 16b1 lymph node biopsy in the management of gallbladder cancer: an analysis.常规 16b1 淋巴结活检在胆囊癌治疗中的作用:分析。
HPB (Oxford). 2014 Mar;16(3):229-34. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12127. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
2
Is para-aortic lymph node metastasis a contraindication for radical resection in biliary carcinoma?腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移是否是胆管癌根治性切除的禁忌证?
World J Surg. 2011 May;35(5):1085-93. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1036-4.
3
A patient with gallbladder cancer with paraaortic lymph node and hepatic metastases who has survived for more than 13 years after the primary extended radical operation.
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2023 May 31;27(2):180-188. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.22-111. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15(6):648-51. doi: 10.1007/s00534-007-1316-4. Epub 2008 Nov 7.
4
Aggressive surgery for stage IV gallbladder carcinoma; what are the contraindications?IV期胆囊癌的积极手术治疗;有哪些禁忌症?
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2007;14(4):351-7. doi: 10.1007/s00534-006-1187-0. Epub 2007 Jul 30.
5
Outcome of radical surgery for stage IV gallbladder carcinoma.IV期胆囊癌根治性手术的结果
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2007;14(4):345-50. doi: 10.1007/s00534-006-1186-1. Epub 2007 Jul 30.
6
Evaluation of aggressive surgical treatment for advanced carcinoma of the gallbladder.晚期胆囊癌积极手术治疗的评估
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2003;10(3):233-8. doi: 10.1007/s00534-003-0848-5.
7
Five-year survivors after aggressive surgery for stage IV gallbladder cancer.IV期胆囊癌积极手术后的5年生存者
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2001;8(6):511-7. doi: 10.1007/s005340100018.
8
Extensive surgery for carcinoma of the gallbladder.胆囊癌的广泛手术治疗。
Br J Surg. 2002 Feb;89(2):179-84. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.02001.x.
9
Positron emission tomography with [(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose for diagnosis and staging of bile duct cancer.使用[(18)F]氟-2-脱氧-D-葡萄糖的正电子发射断层扫描用于胆管癌的诊断和分期
Hepatology. 2001 May;33(5):1029-35. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2001.23912.
10
Regional and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in radical surgery for advanced gallbladder carcinoma.晚期胆囊癌根治性手术中的区域及腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术。
Br J Surg. 2000 Apr;87(4):418-22. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01384.x.