• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用缝线锚钉和临时克氏针双焦点稳定急性肩锁关节脱位:一项回顾性分析

Bifocal Stabilisation of Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation using Suture Anchor and Temporary K-Wires: A Retrospective Analysis.

作者信息

Vijayan S, Kulkarni M S, Jain C P, Shetty S, Aroor M N, Rao S K

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Kasturba Medical College Manipal - MAHE, Manipal, India.

出版信息

Malays Orthop J. 2022 Nov;16(3):104-112. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2211.016.

DOI:10.5704/MOJ.2211.016
PMID:36589364
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9791893/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) is a major link connecting the upper limb to the torso. The acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments help in stabilising the joint. We feel it is prudent to address both these ligament injuries, to achieve optimum result. This study was undertaken to analyse the results of a simple frugal surgical technique we used to deal with this injury considering stabilisation for both these ligaments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, skeletally mature patients with Type III, IV or V ACJ dislocations who underwent open reduction and stabilisation of the joint with temporary K-wires, repair of the capsule and augmentation of CC ligaments with suture anchors were included. Clinico-radiological and functional outcome was evaluated. Functional assessment of the upper limb was analysed using the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Score (DASH), Constant shoulder score (CSS) and Oxford shoulder score (OSS).

RESULTS

Clinical and radiological evaluation of the 32 patients who had completed two years from the index surgery, was done. Out of the 37 patients included initially, five were lost in follow-up. Majority of the subjects included were males and type V was the most common injury. Mean pre-operative CC distance on the affected side was 13.92±4.94mm. In the immediate post-operative radiograph, it was 7.63±2.08mm and in the final follow- up was 9.36±2.75mm. Measurements were taken by two independent investigators and inter, and intra-observer reliability were analysed by Interclass correlation coefficient. Excellent functional outcome was noted despite the 1.81±1.50mm average loss of correction. At final follow-up, mean DASH score was 4.67±4.18, Oxford shoulder score was 44.06±2.44 and Constant shoulder score was 86.37±5.81. The severity of the injury had no significant effect on the functional outcome post our method of stabilisation and rehabilitation.

CONCLUSION

Bifocal fixation restores the multidirectional stability of the disrupted ACJ. Adequate radiological reduction, good functional outcome and simplicity of execution make this technique an undemanding one for use in regular practice.

摘要

引言

肩锁关节(ACJ)是连接上肢与躯干的主要关节。肩锁韧带和喙锁韧带(CC)有助于稳定该关节。我们认为同时处理这两种韧带损伤是谨慎的做法,以获得最佳效果。本研究旨在分析一种简单经济的手术技术的结果,该技术用于处理这种损伤,同时考虑对这两种韧带进行稳定修复。

材料与方法

在这项回顾性研究中,纳入了骨骼成熟的III型、IV型或V型肩锁关节脱位患者,这些患者接受了切开复位,使用临时克氏针固定关节,修复关节囊并用缝合锚加强喙锁韧带。评估临床、放射学和功能结果。使用上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍评分(DASH)、Constant肩部评分(CSS)和牛津肩部评分(OSS)分析上肢的功能评估。

结果

对32例自初次手术起已过去两年的患者进行了临床和放射学评估。最初纳入的37例患者中,5例失访。纳入的大多数受试者为男性,V型损伤最为常见。患侧术前平均喙锁间距为13.92±4.94mm。术后即刻X线片显示为7.63±2.08mm,最终随访时为9.36±2.75mm。测量由两名独立研究者进行,并通过组内相关系数分析观察者间和观察者内的可靠性。尽管平均矫正丢失1.81±1.50mm,但仍观察到良好的功能结果。在最终随访时,平均DASH评分为4.67±4.18,牛津肩部评分为44.06±2.44,Constant肩部评分为86.37±5.81。损伤的严重程度对我们的稳定修复和康复方法后的功能结果没有显著影响。

结论

双焦点固定可恢复受损肩锁关节的多向稳定性。充分的放射学复位、良好的功能结果和操作的简单性使该技术在常规实践中易于应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/536a/9791893/3edb2ccae7a6/moj-16-104-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/536a/9791893/300f1f54cf7d/moj-16-104-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/536a/9791893/9998293f2d8d/moj-16-104-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/536a/9791893/f10a78be13b4/moj-16-104-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/536a/9791893/3edb2ccae7a6/moj-16-104-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/536a/9791893/300f1f54cf7d/moj-16-104-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/536a/9791893/9998293f2d8d/moj-16-104-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/536a/9791893/f10a78be13b4/moj-16-104-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/536a/9791893/3edb2ccae7a6/moj-16-104-f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Bifocal Stabilisation of Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation using Suture Anchor and Temporary K-Wires: A Retrospective Analysis.使用缝线锚钉和临时克氏针双焦点稳定急性肩锁关节脱位:一项回顾性分析
Malays Orthop J. 2022 Nov;16(3):104-112. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2211.016.
2
[Arthroscopic stabilisation of acute acromioclavicular dislocation using the TighRope device].[使用TighRope装置对急性肩锁关节脱位进行关节镜下稳定术]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2013;80(6):386-90.
3
Comparative study of two different horizontal stabilisation methods in arthroscopically assisted coracoclavicular stabilisation for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations-Good clinical outcome and no correlation to recurrent anteroposterior instability.关节镜辅助下喙锁关节稳定术治疗急性肩锁关节脱位时两种不同水平稳定方法的比较研究——良好的临床效果且与复发性前后不稳定无相关性
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 Feb;33(2):716-727. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12374. Epub 2024 Jul 21.
4
Surgery improves the clinical and radiological outcome in Rockwood type IV dislocations, whereas Rockwood type III dislocations benefit from conservative treatment.手术可改善Rockwood IV型脱位的临床和影像学结果,而Rockwood III型脱位则受益于保守治疗。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Jul;29(7):2143-2151. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06193-0. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
5
Arthroscopic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation.关节镜下喙锁韧带重建治疗肩锁关节脱位
J Nippon Med Sch. 2018;85(3):166-171. doi: 10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2018_85-24.
6
Is coracoclavicular stabilisation alone sufficient for the endoscopic treatment of severe acromioclavicular joint dislocation (Rockwood types III, IV, and V)?仅喙锁固定对于严重肩锁关节脱位(Rockwood III型、IV型和V型)的内镜治疗是否足够?
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Dec;101(8 Suppl):S297-303. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.09.003. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
7
Hybrid coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular reconstruction in chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations yields good functional and radiographic results.慢性肩锁关节脱位的杂交型肩锁关节和肩峰锁骨关节重建可获得良好的功能和影像学结果。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Jun;30(6):2084-2091. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06790-7. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
8
Does coracoclavicular augmentation additional to hook plate fixation provide benefits in acute unstable acromioclavicular dislocation? A meta-analysis.除钩钢板固定外,喙锁韧带增强术对急性不稳定肩锁关节脱位是否有益?一项荟萃分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Mar 4;23(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05142-x.
9
Comparison between hook plate fixation with and without coracoclavicular ligament suture for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations.喙锁韧带缝合与否的钩钢板固定治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的比较
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2020 Jan-Apr;28(1):2309499020905058. doi: 10.1177/2309499020905058.
10
Anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) using free tendon allograft is effective for chronic acromioclavicular joint injuries at mid-term follow-up.采用游离肌腱移植物的解剖型肩锁关节韧带重建(ACCR)在中期随访时对于慢性肩锁关节损伤是有效的。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Jul;29(7):2096-2102. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06123-0. Epub 2020 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors related to loss of reduction after anatomic repair of acromioclavicular joint dislocation in patients with acute traumatic acromioclavicular joint dislocation.急性创伤性肩锁关节脱位患者肩锁关节脱位解剖修复后复位丢失的相关危险因素。
JSES Int. 2025 Jan 27;9(3):625-631. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.12.020. eCollection 2025 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Current practice in the management of acromioclavicular joint dislocations; a national survey in the Netherlands.当前肩锁关节脱位管理的实践;荷兰全国性调查。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Oct;47(5):1417-1427. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01414-0. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
2
Acromioclavicular joint dislocations: incidence, injury profile, and patient characteristics from a prospective case series.肩锁关节脱位:来自前瞻性病例系列研究的发病率、损伤情况及患者特征
JSES Int. 2020 Apr 8;4(2):246-250. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.01.009. eCollection 2020 Jun.
3
Comparison between hook plate fixation with and without coracoclavicular ligament suture for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations.
喙锁韧带缝合与否的钩钢板固定治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的比较
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2020 Jan-Apr;28(1):2309499020905058. doi: 10.1177/2309499020905058.
4
Surgical treatment of acute Rockwood III acromioclavicular dislocations-Comparative study between two flip-button techniques.手术治疗急性 Rockwood III 型肩锁关节脱位——两种翻转纽扣技术的比较研究。
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 10;10(1):4447. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61488-z.
5
Comparison of Short-Term Clinical Outcomes of Hook Plate and Continuous Loop Double Endobutton Fixations in Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation.钩钢板与连续环双纽扣钢板固定治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的短期临床疗效比较
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2019 Nov;7(6):545-550.
6
Current concepts in management of ACJ injuries.肩锁关节损伤管理的当前概念。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019 May-Jun;10(3):480-485. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.03.020. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
7
Clinical effectiveness of surgical treatment with polyester tapes and temporary K-wires on complete acromioclavicular dislocation.聚酯带和临时克氏针手术治疗完全性肩锁关节脱位的临床疗效
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019 Apr;29(3):567-573. doi: 10.1007/s00590-018-2321-9. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
8
Arthroscopic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation.关节镜下喙锁韧带重建治疗肩锁关节脱位
J Nippon Med Sch. 2018;85(3):166-171. doi: 10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2018_85-24.
9
Acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a Dog Bone button fixation alone versus Dog Bone button fixation augmented with acromioclavicular repair-a finite element analysis study.肩锁关节脱位:单纯使用犬骨纽扣固定与联合肩锁关节修复的犬骨纽扣固定——有限元分析研究
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 Aug;28(6):1095-1101. doi: 10.1007/s00590-018-2186-y. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
10
Short-term outcomes of arthroscopic TightRope fixation are better than hook plate fixation in acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocations.在急性不稳定肩锁关节脱位中,关节镜下TightRope固定的短期疗效优于钩钢板固定。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 Jul;28(5):869-875. doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-2095-5. Epub 2017 Dec 9.