Suppr超能文献

肩锁关节脱位:单纯使用犬骨纽扣固定与联合肩锁关节修复的犬骨纽扣固定——有限元分析研究

Acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a Dog Bone button fixation alone versus Dog Bone button fixation augmented with acromioclavicular repair-a finite element analysis study.

作者信息

Sumanont Sermsak, Nopamassiri Supachoke, Boonrod Artit, Apiwatanakul Punyawat, Boonrod Arunnit, Phornphutkul Chanakarn

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kalasin Hospital, Kalasin, Thailand.

出版信息

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 Aug;28(6):1095-1101. doi: 10.1007/s00590-018-2186-y. Epub 2018 Mar 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Suspension suture button fixation was frequently used to treat acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation. However, there were many studies reporting about complications and residual horizontal instability after fixation. Our study compared the stability of ACJ after fixation between coracoclavicular (CC) fixation alone and CC fixation combined with ACJ repair by using finite element analysis (FEA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A finite element model was created by using CT images from the normal shoulder. The model 1 was CC fixation with suture button alone, and the model 2 was CC fixation with suture button combined with ACJ repair. Three different forces (50, 100, 200 N) applied to the model in three planes; inferior, anterior and posterior direction load to the acromion. The von Mises stress of the implants and deformation at ACJs was recorded.

RESULTS

The ACJ repair in the model 2 could reduce the peak stress on the implant after applying the loading forces to the acromion which the ACJ repair could reduce the peak stress of the FiberWire at suture button about 90% when compared to model 1. And, the ACJ repair could reduce the deformation of the ACJ after applying the loading forces to the acromion in both vertical and horizontal planes.

CONCLUSION

This FEA supports that the high-grade injuries of the ACJ should be treated with CC fixation combined with ACJ repair because this technique provides excellent stability in both vertical and horizontal planes and reduces stress to the suture button.

摘要

背景

悬吊缝合纽扣固定术常用于治疗肩锁关节(ACJ)脱位。然而,有许多研究报道了固定术后的并发症和残留水平不稳定情况。我们的研究通过有限元分析(FEA)比较了单纯喙锁(CC)固定与CC固定联合ACJ修复术后ACJ的稳定性。

材料与方法

使用正常肩部的CT图像创建有限元模型。模型1为单纯使用缝合纽扣进行CC固定,模型2为使用缝合纽扣进行CC固定并联合ACJ修复。在三个平面上对模型施加三种不同的力(50、100、200 N);向肩峰施加向下、向前和向后的方向载荷。记录植入物的von Mises应力以及ACJ处的变形情况。

结果

与模型1相比,在向肩峰施加加载力后,模型2中的ACJ修复可降低植入物上的峰值应力,ACJ修复可使缝合纽扣处的FiberWire峰值应力降低约90%。并且,在垂直和水平平面上向肩峰施加加载力后,ACJ修复可减少ACJ的变形。

结论

该有限元分析支持ACJ的高级别损伤应采用CC固定联合ACJ修复进行治疗,因为该技术在垂直和水平平面上均提供了出色的稳定性,并降低了缝合纽扣处的应力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验