Mancini S, Segou M, Werner M J, Parsons T, Beroza G, Chiaraluce L
British Geological Survey Lyell Centre Edinburgh UK.
School of Earth Sciences University of Bristol Bristol UK.
J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 2022 Nov;127(11):e2022JB025202. doi: 10.1029/2022JB025202. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
Enhanced earthquake catalogs provide detailed images of evolving seismic sequences. Currently, these data sets take some time to be released but will soon become available in real time. Here, we explore whether and how enhanced seismic catalogs feeding into established short-term earthquake forecasting protocols may result in higher predictive skill. We consider three enhanced catalogs for the 2016-2017 Central Italy sequence, featuring a bulk completeness lower by at least two magnitude units compared to the real-time catalog and an improved hypocentral resolution. We use them to inform a set of physical Coulomb Rate-and-State (CRS) and statistical Epidemic-Type Aftershock Sequence (ETAS) models to forecast the space-time occurrence of M3+ events during the first 6 months of the sequence. We track model performance using standard likelihood-based metrics and compare their skill against the best-performing CRS and ETAS models among those developed with the real-time catalog. We find that while the incorporation of the triggering contributions from new small magnitude detections of the enhanced catalogs is beneficial for both types of forecasts, these models do not significantly outperform their respective near real-time benchmarks. To explore the reasons behind this result, we perform targeted sensitivity tests that show how (a) the typical spatial discretizations of forecast experiments ( 2 km) hamper the ability of models to capture highly localized secondary triggering patterns and (b) differences in earthquake parameters (i.e., magnitude and hypocenters) reported in different catalogs can affect forecast evaluation. These findings will contribute toward improving forecast model design and evaluation strategies for next-generation seismic catalogs.
增强型地震目录提供了不断演变的地震序列的详细图像。目前,这些数据集需要一些时间才能发布,但很快将实时可用。在此,我们探讨输入既定短期地震预测协议的增强型地震目录是否以及如何能带来更高的预测技能。我们考虑了2016 - 2017年意大利中部地震序列的三个增强型目录,其整体完整性比实时目录至少低两个震级单位,且震源分辨率有所提高。我们用它们为一组物理库仑率态(CRS)和统计型余震序列(ETAS)模型提供信息,以预测该序列前6个月M3 +事件的时空发生情况。我们使用基于标准似然性的指标来跟踪模型性能,并将其技能与使用实时目录开发的最佳性能CRS和ETAS模型进行比较。我们发现,虽然纳入增强型目录中新的小震级检测的触发贡献对两种类型的预测都有益,但这些模型并未显著优于其各自的近实时基准。为了探究这一结果背后的原因,我们进行了有针对性的敏感性测试,结果表明:(a)预测实验中典型的空间离散化(2千米)阻碍了模型捕捉高度局部化的二次触发模式的能力;(b)不同目录中报告的地震参数(即震级和震源)差异会影响预测评估。这些发现将有助于改进下一代地震目录的预测模型设计和评估策略。