• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2013年至2020年加利福尼亚人心理困扰加剧:种族/族裔差异

Increasing psychological distress among Californians from 2013 to 2020: Race/ethnic differences.

作者信息

Tran Sydney, Wormley Alexandra S, Louie Patricia, Sheehan Connor

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, USA.

Department of Sociology, University of Washington, USA.

出版信息

SSM Ment Health. 2022 Dec;2:100101. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmmh.2022.100101. Epub 2022 Apr 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.ssmmh.2022.100101
PMID:36590986
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9792130/
Abstract

The influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health is of mounting concern to population-health researchers. While early reports indicated increases in mental health problems, noticeably absent from these studies is how mental health has changed in 2020 compared to previous years (2013-2019) and whether such trends vary by race/ethnicity. The present study used repeated cross-sectional data from the California Health Interview Survey (n ​= ​168,216) to systematically document trends in psychological distress scores (Kessler-6 scale; K6) and severe psychological distress scores (K6; 13+) from 2013 to 2020 and by race/ethnicity over the same period. Among all Californians we find that the reported average psychological distress scores increased by 22% between 2013 and 2020. Reported severe psychological distress scores increased 61% from 2013 to 2020. These increases were largely concentrated in the years 2017-2020. Increases in psychological distress were also especially pronounced among non-Latino/a White Californians (29% increase in K6 from 2013 to 2020), Latino/a Californians (14% increase in K6 from 2013 to 2020), and Asian Californians (35% increase in K6 from 2013 to 2020). Multiple and logistic regression models that accounted for sociodemographic and behavioral health covariates echoed these findings. Future research should continue to investigate secular trends in mental health that coincided with the COVID-19 pandemic and carefully situate the shifts into broader temporal perspective.

摘要

新冠疫情对心理健康的影响日益引起人群健康研究人员的关注。虽然早期报告显示心理健康问题有所增加,但这些研究明显缺乏2020年与前几年(2013 - 2019年)相比心理健康状况如何变化以及这种趋势是否因种族/族裔而异的内容。本研究使用了加利福尼亚健康访谈调查的重复横断面数据(n = 168,216),系统记录了2013年至2020年心理困扰得分(凯斯勒6项量表;K6)和严重心理困扰得分(K6;13分及以上)的趋势,以及同期按种族/族裔划分的趋势。在所有加利福尼亚人中,我们发现报告的平均心理困扰得分在2013年至2020年间增加了22%。报告的严重心理困扰得分从2013年到2020年增加了61%。这些增加主要集中在2017 - 2020年。心理困扰的增加在非拉丁裔白人加利福尼亚人(2013年至2020年K6增加29%)、拉丁裔加利福尼亚人(2013年至2020年K6增加14%)和亚裔加利福尼亚人(2013年至2020年K6增加35%)中也尤为明显。考虑了社会人口统计学和行为健康协变量的多元和逻辑回归模型也印证了这些发现。未来的研究应继续调查与新冠疫情同时出现的心理健康长期趋势,并将这些变化置于更广泛的时间视角中进行仔细分析。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56bf/9792130/4d90948956cf/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56bf/9792130/4d90948956cf/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56bf/9792130/4d90948956cf/gr1_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Increasing psychological distress among Californians from 2013 to 2020: Race/ethnic differences.2013年至2020年加利福尼亚人心理困扰加剧:种族/族裔差异
SSM Ment Health. 2022 Dec;2:100101. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmmh.2022.100101. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
2
Self-reported domain-specific and accelerometer-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour in relation to psychological distress among an urban Asian population.自我报告的特定领域的身体活动和基于加速度计的身体活动以及久坐行为与城市亚洲人群的心理困扰的关系。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Apr 5;15(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0669-1.
3
Psychological Distress Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Adults in the United Kingdom Based on Coordinated Analyses of 11 Longitudinal Studies.基于 11 项纵向研究的协调分析,英国成年人在 COVID-19 大流行前后的心理困扰。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e227629. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.7629.
4
Racial/ethnic differences in correlates of psychological distress among five Asian-American subgroups and non-Hispanic Whites.五个亚裔美国人亚组与非西班牙裔白人在心理困扰相关因素上的种族/族裔差异。
Ethn Health. 2020 Nov;25(8):1072-1088. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2018.1481495. Epub 2018 May 29.
5
Suicidal Ideation and Predictors of Psychological Distress during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Eswatini: A Population-Based Household Telephone Survey.新冠疫情期间斯威士兰的自杀意念与心理困扰预测因素:一项基于人群的家庭电话调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 22;18(13):6700. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136700.
6
A life-course and time perspective on the construct validity of psychological distress in women and men. Measurement invariance of the K6 across gender.从生命历程和时间角度看女性和男性心理困扰的结构效度。K6 在性别间的测量不变性。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Jul 21;10:68. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-68.
7
Neighborhood social cohesion and serious psychological distress among Asian, Black, Hispanic/Latinx, and White adults in the United States: a cross-sectional study.美国亚裔、非裔、西班牙裔/拉丁裔和白人群体中邻里社会凝聚力与严重心理困扰的关系:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 15;22(1):1191. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13572-4.
8
Psychological distress in community-dwelling individuals living with severe and persistent mental illness.社区居住的严重和持久的精神疾病患者的心理困扰。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2023 Sep;69(6):1327-1334. doi: 10.1177/00207640231160102. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
9
Psychological distress and emergency department utilization in the United States: evidence from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.美国的心理困扰和急诊科利用情况:来自医疗支出面板调查的证据。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 May;21(5):510-9. doi: 10.1111/acem.12369.
10
The Kessler psychological distress scale: translation and validation of an Arabic version.凯斯勒心理困扰量表:阿拉伯语版本的翻译与验证
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Oct 27;15(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0783-9.

引用本文的文献

1
The link between exposure to violence and psychological distress among middle-aged Muslims in Israel: the role of gender.暴露于暴力与以色列中年穆斯林心理困扰之间的联系:性别所扮演的角色。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 5;12:1382053. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1382053. eCollection 2024.
2
Time-course changes in mental distress and their predictors in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: A longitudinal multi-site study of hospital staff.《新冠肺炎疫情期间精神困扰及其预测因素的时程变化:一项针对医院员工的纵向多中心研究》
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 5;18(10):e0292302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292302. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Educational Attainment and Psychological Distress Among Working-Age Adults in the United States.美国劳动年龄成年人的教育程度与心理困扰
SSM Ment Health. 2021 Dec;1. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmmh.2021.100003. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
2
Lack of Arab or Middle Eastern and North African Health Data Undermines Assessment of Health Disparities.缺乏阿拉伯、中东和北非地区的健康数据会影响对健康差异的评估。
Am J Public Health. 2022 Feb;112(2):209-212. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306590.
3
Trends in Psychological Distress Among US Adults During Different Phases of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
新冠疫情大流行不同阶段美国成年人心理困扰趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2144776. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44776.
4
School Closures During Social Lockdown and Mental Health, Health Behaviors, and Well-being Among Children and Adolescents During the First COVID-19 Wave: A Systematic Review.首次新冠疫情浪潮期间社会封锁期间学校关闭与儿童青少年心理健康、健康行为及幸福感:一项系统综述
JAMA Pediatr. 2022 Apr 1;176(4):400-409. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.5840.
5
COVID-19 Rapid Response: How the California Health Interview Survey Adapted During the Global Pandemic.COVID-19快速响应:加利福尼亚健康访谈调查在全球大流行期间如何进行调整
Am J Public Health. 2021 Dec;111(12):2122-2126. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306518.
6
Trends in the Use of Benzodiazepines, Z-Hypnotics, and Serotonergic Drugs Among US Women and Men Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行之前和期间,美国女性和男性使用苯二氮䓬类药物、Z 类催眠药和 5-羟色胺能药物的趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2131012. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.31012.
7
Symbolic disempowerment and Donald Trump's 2016 presidential election: Mental health responses among Latinx and white populations.象征性的权力丧失与唐纳德·特朗普 2016 年总统大选:拉丁裔和白人群体的心理健康反应。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Nov;289:114417. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114417. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
8
Persistent depressive symptoms during COVID-19: a national, population-representative, longitudinal study of U.S. adults.新冠疫情期间的持续性抑郁症状:一项针对美国成年人的全国性、具有人口代表性的纵向研究。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Jan;5:100091. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2021.100091. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
9
COVID-19 mitigation policies and psychological distress in young adults.新冠疫情缓解政策与年轻人的心理困扰
SSM Ment Health. 2022 Dec;2:100027. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmmh.2021.100027. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
10
Do Racial Differences in Coping Resources Explain the Black-White Paradox in Mental Health? A Test of Multiple Mechanisms.应对资源中的种族差异能否解释心理健康中的黑-白悖论?对多种机制的检验。
J Health Soc Behav. 2022 Mar;63(1):55-70. doi: 10.1177/00221465211041031. Epub 2021 Sep 22.