Park Hyunjeong, Choi Eunsuk, Wenzel Jennifer A
Department of Nursing, Towson University, Towson, MD, USA.
School of Nursing & Research Institute of Nursing Science, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea.
Ethn Health. 2020 Nov;25(8):1072-1088. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2018.1481495. Epub 2018 May 29.
Despite their vastly different historical backgrounds, unique languages and variable pre- and post-immigration experiences, Asian-Americans are considered to share stressors surrounding immigration, but there is a gap in describing manifestations of possible mental distress. Thus, the purpose of this study was to explore and compare differences in factors associated with psychological distress among Asian subgroups including Chinese, Filipino, Vietnamese, Korean, Japanese, and non-Hispanic Whites. Using a cross-sectional study design, California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) 2011/2012 data were analyzed. The sample consisted of 29,142 participants: 25,645 non-Hispanic Whites, 3497 non-Hispanic Asian-Americans, 1156 Chinese, 471 Filipinos, 864 Vietnamese, 704 Koreans, and 302 Japanese. Sociodemographic characteristics included gender, age group, marital status, education, poverty level, working status, health insurance, level of acculturation, social cohesion, neighborhood safety, and civic engagement. Physical health status included disability and chronic illness. Psychological distress was evaluated using the Kessler 6 (K6) scale. Results showed that psychological distress levels ranged between 1.96 and 4.52 (< .05) out of 24 and associated factors were significantly different among the five Asian subgroups and non-Hispanic Whites. The current study highlights the differences in characteristics of psychological distress among Asian subgroups. It underscores the significance of understanding individualized cultural and historical background in each Asian subgroup and subsequently developing and applying appropriate interventions for those groups. In addition, different influencing factors should be applied to assess and prioritize the needs of Asian subgroups to improve psychological distress. The study also warrants further investigation and careful description of each Asian subgroups.
尽管亚裔美国人有着截然不同的历史背景、独特的语言以及移民前后各不相同的经历,但他们被认为面临着围绕移民的共同压力源,不过在描述可能的精神困扰表现方面存在差距。因此,本研究的目的是探讨和比较包括华裔、菲律宾裔、越南裔、韩裔、日裔以及非西班牙裔白人在内的亚裔亚群体中与心理困扰相关因素的差异。采用横断面研究设计,对2011/2012年加利福尼亚健康访谈调查(CHIS)数据进行了分析。样本包括29142名参与者:25645名非西班牙裔白人、3497名非西班牙裔亚裔美国人、1156名华裔、471名菲律宾裔、864名越南裔、704名韩裔和302名日裔。社会人口学特征包括性别、年龄组、婚姻状况、教育程度、贫困水平、工作状况、医疗保险、文化适应程度、社会凝聚力、社区安全和公民参与度。身体健康状况包括残疾和慢性病。使用凯斯勒6项量表(K6)评估心理困扰。结果显示,心理困扰水平在24分制中为1.96至4.52(<0.05),五个亚裔亚群体和非西班牙裔白人之间的相关因素存在显著差异。本研究突出了亚裔亚群体中心理困扰特征的差异。它强调了了解每个亚裔亚群体个性化文化和历史背景并随后为这些群体制定和应用适当干预措施的重要性。此外,应采用不同的影响因素来评估和优先考虑亚裔亚群体的需求,以改善心理困扰。该研究还需要对每个亚裔亚群体进行进一步调查和细致描述。