Arora Roshni, Gupta Tarun, Mirdha Nitin, Gill Bobbin
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Vyas Dental College and Hospital Affiliated to Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
J Conserv Dent. 2022 Nov-Dec;25(6):625-629. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_271_22. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of newly developed irrigation systems, i.e., XP-endo Finisher file (XP-endo), EndoActivator (EA), and Endo-Irrigator Plus (EI) with gold standard passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) tip and in removal of calcium hydroxide (CH) from single-rooted teeth with artificial simulated internal resorption cavities.
One hundred and twenty single-rooted mandibular premolars were decoronated and prepared using the ProTaper Gold system up to F5. Samples were buccolingually sectioned and resorption cavities were prepared. Twenty specimens were served as Group 1 - negative control. In the remaining specimens, CH was delivered and root halves were brought together. Twenty specimens were served as Group 2 - positive control. The remaining specimens were randomly divided into four experimental groups ( = 20), where NaOCl and EDTA were activated using PUI, XP-endo, EA, and EI for 1 min. The remnants of CH were scored and analyzed by employing Kruskal-Wallis H- and Mann-Whitney U-tests.
PUI and XP-endo removed more CH than other devices ( < 0.05), showing no significant difference between them.
None of the tested systems were able to remove CH completely from resorption cavities. PUI and XP-endo were superior to other tested devices.
本研究旨在比较新开发的冲洗系统,即XP-endo Finisher锉(XP-endo)、EndoActivator(EA)和Endo-Irrigator Plus(EI)与金标准被动超声冲洗(PUI)尖端在去除单根牙人工模拟内吸收腔中氢氧化钙(CH)方面的效果。
120颗单根下颌前磨牙去冠,使用ProTaper Gold系统预备至F5。样本进行颊舌向切片并制备吸收腔。20个标本作为第1组——阴性对照。在其余标本中,输送CH并将牙根两半合拢。20个标本作为第2组——阳性对照。其余标本随机分为四个实验组(每组n = 20),使用PUI、XP-endo、EA和EI激活次氯酸钠(NaOCl)和乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)1分钟。采用Kruskal-Wallis H检验和Mann-Whitney U检验对CH残留量进行评分和分析。
PUI和XP-endo去除的CH比其他器械更多(P < 0.05),二者之间无显著差异。
所测试的系统均不能完全从吸收腔中去除CH。PUI和XP-endo优于其他测试器械。