• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the England Community Pharmacy Quality Scheme (2018-2019 and 2019-2020) in reducing harm from NSAIDs in older patients.评估英格兰社区药房质量计划(2018-2019 年和 2019-2020 年)在减少老年患者 NSAIDs 相关伤害的作用。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Jan;12(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002002.
2
An Evaluation of Oral Anticoagulant Safety Indicators by England's Community Pharmacies.英国社区药房对口服抗凝剂安全指标的评估。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2024 Aug 29;12(5):134. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy12050134.
3
Pharmacist intervention reduces gastropathy risk in patients using NSAIDs.药剂师干预可降低使用非甾体抗炎药患者的胃病风险。
Pharm World Sci. 2008 Dec;30(6):947-54. doi: 10.1007/s11096-008-9258-8. Epub 2008 Oct 19.
4
Evaluation of risk profiles for gastrointestinal and cardiovascular adverse effects in nonselective NSAID and COX-2 inhibitor users: a cohort study using pharmacy dispensing data in The Netherlands.非选择性非甾体抗炎药和COX-2抑制剂使用者胃肠道及心血管不良反应风险特征评估:一项利用荷兰药房配药数据的队列研究
Drug Saf. 2008;31(2):143-58. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200831020-00004.
5
Evaluation of community pharmacists' roles in screening and communication of risks about non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in Thailand.泰国社区药剂师在非甾体抗炎药风险筛查与沟通中作用的评估
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2018 Nov;19(6):598-604. doi: 10.1017/S1463423618000142. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
6
Effectiveness of interventions by community pharmacists to reduce risk of gastrointestinal side effects in nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug users.社区药剂师采取干预措施降低非选择性非甾体抗炎药使用者胃肠道副作用风险的效果。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2014 Apr;23(4):382-9. doi: 10.1002/pds.3587. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
7
Patient-reported communications with pharmacy staff at community pharmacies: the Alabama NSAID Patient Safety Study, 2005-2007.患者对社区药店药剂师沟通情况的报告:亚拉巴马州 NSAID 患者安全研究,2005-2007 年。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2009 Sep-Oct;49(5):e110-7. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2009.09005.
8
Assessment of Qatar community pharmacists' competence and practices related to renal and gastrointestinal adverse effects of nonprescription NSAIDs.卡塔尔社区药剂师对非处方非甾体抗炎药肾脏和胃肠道不良反应的认知能力及实践评估。
Saudi Pharm J. 2022 Oct;30(10):1396-1404. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2022.06.011. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
9
Non-prescription treatment of NSAID induced GORD by Australian pharmacies: a national simulated patient study.澳大利亚药店对非甾体抗炎药引起的胃食管反流病的非处方治疗:一项全国模拟患者研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2015 Oct;37(5):851-6. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0129-9. Epub 2015 May 14.
10
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), cyxlooxygenase-2 selective inhibitors (coxibs) and gastrointestinal harm: review of clinical trials and clinical practice.非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)、环氧化酶-2选择性抑制剂(coxibs)与胃肠道损害:临床试验及临床实践综述
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 Oct 20;7:79. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-79.

引用本文的文献

1
Do pay-for-performance schemes improve quality in community pharmacy? A mixed-methods study exploring stakeholder perspectives on implementation of the nationwide Pharmacy Quality Scheme (PQS) in England?绩效付费计划能否提高社区药房的服务质量?一项混合方法研究,探讨利益相关者对英国全国性药房质量计划(PQS)实施情况的看法
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 16;20(4):e0319215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319215. eCollection 2025.
2
An Evaluation of Oral Anticoagulant Safety Indicators by England's Community Pharmacies.英国社区药房对口服抗凝剂安全指标的评估。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2024 Aug 29;12(5):134. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy12050134.
3
Estimating the economic effect of harm associated with high risk prescribing of oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in England: population based cohort and economic modelling study.评估英格兰高风险处方口服非甾体抗炎药相关危害的经济影响:基于人群的队列和经济建模研究。
BMJ. 2024 Jul 24;386:e077880. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-077880.
4
Evaluation of the knowledge, practices, and attitudes of community pharmacists towards adverse effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs): a cross-sectional study.社区药剂师对非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)不良反应的知识、实践和态度评估:一项横断面研究。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2023 Nov 1;16(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s40545-023-00641-1.
5
Responding to Urinary Tract Infection Symptoms in England's Community Pharmacies.应对英格兰社区药房中的尿路感染症状。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Aug 30;12(9):1383. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12091383.
6
The Use of the TARGET Antibiotic Checklist to Support Antimicrobial Stewardship in England's Community Pharmacies.使用TARGET抗生素清单以支持英格兰社区药房的抗菌药物管理
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Mar 24;12(4):647. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12040647.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Pharmacists' Interventions and Patients' Decision on Health Outcomes in Terms of Medication Adherence and Quality Use of Medicines among Patients Attending Community Pharmacies: A Systematic Review.社区药房中,药师干预和患者决策对药物依从性和药物合理使用的健康结局的影响:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 21;18(9):4392. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094392.
2
Oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in recreational runners participating in Parkrun UK: Prevalence of use and awareness of risk.在参与英国 Parkrun 的休闲跑者中使用口服非甾体抗炎药:使用率和风险意识。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2020 Dec;28(6):561-568. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12646. Epub 2020 Jun 21.
3
Economic analysis of the prevalence and clinical and economic burden of medication error in England.英格兰药物错误的流行情况及其临床和经济负担的经济分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Feb;30(2):96-105. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010206. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
4
Knowledge of patients on safe medication use in relation to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.患者对非甾体抗炎药安全用药的了解情况。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2019 Apr-Jun;13(2):106-111. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_557_18.
5
Factors influencing the acceptance of referrals for clinical pharmacist managed disease states in primary care.影响基层医疗中临床药师管理疾病状态转介接受度的因素。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2019 May-Jun;59(3):336-342. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2019.02.008. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
6
The NHS long term plan.英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)长期计划。
BMJ. 2019 Jan 7;364:l84. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l84.
7
GPs' views and experiences of prescribing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a qualitative study.全科医生开具非甾体抗炎药的观点和经验:一项定性研究。
BJGP Open. 2017 May 31;1(2):bjgpopen17X100869. doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen17X100869.
8
Effect of a Pharmacist-Led Educational Intervention on Inappropriate Medication Prescriptions in Older Adults: The D-PRESCRIBE Randomized Clinical Trial.药师主导的教育干预对老年人不合理用药处方的影响:D-PRESCRIBE 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2018 Nov 13;320(18):1889-1898. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.16131.
9
Pharmacists' Role in Opioid Safety: A Focus Group Investigation.药剂师在阿片类药物安全方面的作用:一项焦点小组调查。
Pain Med. 2018 Sep 1;19(9):1799-1806. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx139.
10
Promoting Safer Use of High-Risk Pharmacotherapy: Impact of Pharmacist-Led Targeted Medication Reviews.促进高风险药物治疗的安全使用:药师主导的靶向药物审查的影响。
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2015 Sep;2(3):261-271. doi: 10.1007/s40801-015-0031-8.

评估英格兰社区药房质量计划(2018-2019 年和 2019-2020 年)在减少老年患者 NSAIDs 相关伤害的作用。

Evaluation of the England Community Pharmacy Quality Scheme (2018-2019 and 2019-2020) in reducing harm from NSAIDs in older patients.

机构信息

Primary, Community and Personalised Care Directorate, NHS England, London, UK

Primary, Community and Personalised Care Directorate, NHS England, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Jan;12(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002002.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002002
PMID:36593072
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9809222/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used for their analgesic and anti-inflammatory action, but the gastrointestinal (GI) adverse effects are a known cause of preventable harm. A medication safety audit was incentivised for community pharmacies in England in 2 successive years as part of the Pharmacy Quality Scheme (PQS) to address GI safety of NSAIDs.

AIMS

To evaluate community pharmacy's contributions to NSAID safety and determine any change between audit 1 (2018-2019) and audit 2 (2019-2020).

METHOD

Patients aged 65 years or over prescribed an NSAID were included in both audits. The audit tool assessed compliance with national standards relating to co-prescribed gastroprotection, referrals to the prescriber and patient advice on long-term NSAID use and effects, with responses submitted via an online portal. Descriptive analyses were performed to explore differences between the years and tested for significance using Χ tests. Qualitative data were analysed using an inductive thematic approach.

KEY FINDINGS

Data from 91 252 patients in audit 1 and 73 992 in audit 2 were analysed. More patients were prescribed gastroprotection in audit 2 (85.0%) than audit 1 (80.7%, p<0.001). More patients without gastroprotection in audit 2 had a current or recent referral (67.5%) than in audit 1 (58.8%, p<0.001). Verbal or other communications between pharmacists and patients about their NSAID medication were reported more frequently in audit 2 (76.0% vs 63.5%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

During two audits, community pharmacists in England reported referring more than 15 000 patients at risk of preventable harm from NSAIDs to prescribers for review. The audits demonstrated significant potential for year-on-year improvement in GI safety for a large cohort of older patients prescribed NSAIDs. This evaluation provides evidence of how the PQS can effectively address a specific aspect of medicines safety and the place of community pharmacy more broadly in improving medicines safety.

摘要

简介

非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)因其镇痛和抗炎作用而被广泛应用,但胃肠道(GI)不良反应是可预防损害的已知原因。作为 Pharmacy Quality Scheme(PQS)的一部分,英格兰的社区药房在连续两年内进行了药物安全审核,以解决 NSAIDs 的胃肠道安全性问题。

目的

评估社区药房在 NSAID 安全性方面的贡献,并确定审核 1(2018-2019 年)和审核 2(2019-2020 年)之间的任何变化。

方法

在两次审核中,均纳入年龄在 65 岁或以上并开具 NSAID 的患者。审核工具评估了与共同开具胃保护剂、向处方医生转介以及患者关于长期 NSAID 使用和影响的建议相关的国家标准的遵守情况,通过在线门户提交回复。使用 Χ 检验进行描述性分析,以探索各年之间的差异,并检验其显著性。使用归纳主题方法对定性数据进行分析。

主要发现

对审核 1 的 91252 名患者和审核 2 的 73992 名患者的数据进行了分析。在审核 2 中,开具胃保护剂的患者比例(85.0%)高于审核 1(80.7%,p<0.001)。在审核 2 中,没有开具胃保护剂的患者中,有当前或近期转介的比例(67.5%)高于审核 1(58.8%,p<0.001)。在审核 2 中,药剂师与患者之间就 NSAID 药物进行口头或其他交流的报告频率更高(76.0% vs 63.5%,p<0.001)。

结论

在两次审核中,英格兰的社区药剂师报告称,将 15000 多名有 NSAID 相关可预防损害风险的患者转介给医生进行审查。这些审核表明,在为大量开具 NSAID 的老年患者提供胃肠道安全性方面,每年都有显著的改善潜力。该评估提供了证据,证明了 PQS 如何能够有效地解决药品安全的一个特定方面,以及社区药房在改善药品安全方面的更广泛作用。