Metzler Janna, Saw Terry, Nono Denis, Kadondi Agatha, Zhang Yuan, Leu Cheng-Shiun, Gabriel Aimyleen, Savage Kevin, Landers Cassie
Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
AfriChild Center for the Study of the African Child, Makerere University, New York, NY, USA.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;64(6):907-917. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13746. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
The effects of conflict and displacement on adolescent mental health and protection are profound and can have lasting consequences. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of two group-based psychosocial interventions on mental health and protection of South Sudanese refugee adolescents.
A randomized controlled trial was done in four villages within the Omugo extension of Rhino Camp refugee settlement in the West Nile region of Uganda. Male and female adolescents (aged 9-14 years) were randomly assigned to attend 12 weeks of either a Standard psychosocial intervention delivered in a child-friendly space (CFS) or a more structured sequential delivery of psychosocial sessions guided by a newly developed Toolkit for Child-Friendly Spaces in Humanitarian Settings. The primary outcomes were psychological distress and resilience 12 months after baseline assessment. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03897894.
Between May 28, 2019, and February 20, 2020, 1,280 eligible adolescents were recruited. With 70.2% retention at follow-up, 214 assigned to the Standard, 211 assigned to the Toolkit, and 370 assigned to the waitlist control were included in the intention-to-treat and as-treated analysis. Both the Toolkit and Standard approaches were more effective in reducing psychological distress and perceived protection risks reported by adolescents compared to no intervention. Differential intervention impacts are indicated in subgroup analyses.
The trial found that both psychosocial interventions when implemented in a CFS are well suited as a first-line mental health and violence prevention intervention for adolescent populations exposed to conflict and forced displacement. Where feasible, CFS should be implemented as a primary response strategy soon after displacement to improve psychological health and reduce the risk environment for adolescents.
冲突和流离失所对青少年心理健康及保护的影响深远,且可能产生持久后果。我们旨在调查两种基于小组的心理社会干预措施对南苏丹难民青少年心理健康及保护的有效性。
在乌干达西尼罗河地区犀牛营难民营奥穆戈分区的四个村庄开展了一项随机对照试验。年龄在9至14岁的青少年被随机分配,参加为期12周的以下两种干预之一:在儿童友好空间(CFS)中提供的标准心理社会干预,或由新开发的人道主义环境中儿童友好空间工具包指导的更具结构性的系列心理社会课程。主要结局是基线评估12个月后的心理困扰和恢复力。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT03897894。
在2019年5月28日至2020年2月20日期间,招募了1280名符合条件的青少年。随访时保留率为70.2%,214名被分配到标准组,211名被分配到工具包组,370名被分配到等待名单对照组,纳入意向性分析和实际治疗分析。与无干预相比,工具包组和标准组方法在降低青少年报告的心理困扰和感知保护风险方面都更有效。亚组分析显示了不同的干预效果。
该试验发现,在儿童友好空间实施的这两种心理社会干预措施都非常适合作为针对遭受冲突和被迫流离失所的青少年人群的一线心理健康和暴力预防干预措施。在可行的情况下,儿童友好空间应在流离失所后尽快作为主要应对策略实施,以改善青少年的心理健康并降低其风险环境。