Pfefferbaum Betty, Nitiéma Pascal, Newman Elana, Slaughter Autumn, Van Horn Richard L
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 920 Stanton L. Young Boulevard, Oklahoma City, 73104-0901, USA.
Department of Information Systems, W.P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, USA.
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2025 Feb;27(2):112-126. doi: 10.1007/s11920-024-01579-0. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
The goals of this analysis were to identify practice elements frequently used in child mass trauma interventions and to determine if these elements differed across interventions with respect to type of event addressed.
The most frequent elements used were psychoeducation for the child, affect modulation, relaxation, cognitive techniques, exposure, support networking, and narrative. The most frequently used elements were similar for political violence and natural disaster interventions but differed for COVID-19 interventions. Similarities in elements used in political violence and natural disaster interventions reflect the all-hazards approach to mass trauma response. Differences for COVID-19 interventions may address distinctions between the pandemic and these events and underscore the importance of considering an expanded set of elements in future research. The findings suggest that characteristics of the event as well as the population receiving the intervention and the context should guide the selection of interventions and intervention elements.
本分析的目标是确定儿童群体创伤干预中常用的实践要素，并确定这些要素在针对不同类型事件的干预措施中是否存在差异。
最常用的要素包括对儿童的心理教育、情绪调节、放松、认知技巧、暴露疗法、支持网络和叙事疗法。政治暴力和自然灾害干预措施中最常用的要素相似，但在针对新冠疫情的干预措施中有所不同。政治暴力和自然灾害干预措施中使用的要素相似，反映了应对群体创伤的全灾种方法。针对新冠疫情的干预措施存在差异，可能反映了该大流行与这些事件之间的区别，并强调了在未来研究中考虑更多要素的重要性。研究结果表明，事件的特征、接受干预的人群以及背景应指导干预措施和干预要素的选择。
