• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Association of Habitual Checking Behaviors on Social Media With Longitudinal Functional Brain Development.社交媒体习惯性查看行为与大脑功能纵向发育的关联。
JAMA Pediatr. 2023 Feb 1;177(2):160-167. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.4924.
2
Age associations with neural processing of reward anticipation in adolescents with bipolar disorders.双相情感障碍青少年中与奖励预期神经加工的年龄关联。
Neuroimage Clin. 2016 Mar 18;11:476-485. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.03.013. eCollection 2016.
3
Neural sensitivity following stress predicts anhedonia symptoms: a 2-year multi-wave, longitudinal study.应激后神经敏感性预测快感缺失症状:一项为期 2 年的多波、纵向研究。
Transl Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 22;14(1):106. doi: 10.1038/s41398-024-02818-x.
4
Neural responses to reward valence and magnitude from pre- to early adolescence.从青春期前到青春期早期,对奖励效价和大小的神经反应。
Neuroimage. 2023 Jul 15;275:120166. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120166. Epub 2023 May 12.
5
Mapping social reward and punishment processing in the human brain: A voxel-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging findings using the social incentive delay task.基于社会激励延迟任务的脑影像研究:人类大脑中社会奖赏和惩罚加工的体素水平元分析
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Mar;122:1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.12.034. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
6
Racial Discrimination and Risk for Internalizing and Externalizing Symptoms Among Black Youths.种族歧视与黑人青少年内化和外化症状风险的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2416491. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.16491.
7
Striatal Activity to Reward Anticipation as a Moderator of the Association Between Early Behavioral Inhibition and Changes in Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms From Adolescence to Adulthood.纹状体对奖励预期的活动作为青少年期到成年期焦虑和抑郁症状变化与早期行为抑制之间关联的调节因素。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 1;79(12):1199-1208. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.3483.
8
Association of Digital Media Use With Subsequent Symptoms of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Among Adolescents.数字媒体使用与青少年后续注意缺陷/多动障碍症状的关联。
JAMA. 2018 Jul 17;320(3):255-263. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.8931.
9
Role of Positive Parenting in the Association Between Neighborhood Social Disadvantage and Brain Development Across Adolescence.积极育儿在邻里社会劣势与青少年大脑发育关联中的作用。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Aug 1;74(8):824-832. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.1558.
10
Shared and distinct neural activity during anticipation and outcome of win and loss: A meta-analysis of the monetary incentive delay task.在期待和赢得/输掉金钱奖励的结果期间,共享和独特的神经活动:金钱奖励延迟任务的元分析。
Neuroimage. 2022 Dec 1;264:119764. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119764. Epub 2022 Nov 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Adolescents' daily social media use and mood during the COVID-19 lockdown period.新冠疫情封锁期间青少年的日常社交媒体使用情况与情绪状况
Curr Res Ecol Soc Psychol. 2024;7. doi: 10.1016/j.cresp.2024.100196. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
2
Modern Day High: The Neurocognitive Impact of Social Media Usage.现代的“兴奋感”:社交媒体使用对神经认知的影响。
Cureus. 2025 Jul 8;17(7):e87496. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87496. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Beyond problematic social media use and the brain: A public health and policy perspective.超越社交媒体使用问题与大脑:公共卫生与政策视角
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2025 Aug;1550(1):14-22. doi: 10.1111/nyas.15409. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
4
Causal effects of physical activity and screen time on childhood intelligence via Mendelian randomization: The mediating role of intracranial volume.通过孟德尔随机化研究身体活动和屏幕使用时间对儿童智力的因果效应:颅内体积的中介作用。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2025 Jun 20;74:101586. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101586.
5
Examining measurement discrepancies in adolescent screen media activity with insights from the ABCD study.借助青少年大脑认知发展(ABCD)研究的见解,审视青少年屏幕媒体活动中的测量差异。
Npj Ment Health Res. 2025 May 10;4(1):15. doi: 10.1038/s44184-025-00131-z.
6
Hijacked by the Feed: Social Media Neuroengineering-Induced Digital Anhedonia.被信息流劫持:社交媒体神经工程引发的数字快感缺失
Cureus. 2025 Apr 30;17(4):e83256. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83256. eCollection 2025 Apr.
7
How positive and negative feedback following real interactions changes subsequent sender ratings.真实互动后的正负反馈如何改变后续发送者的评分。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 3;15(1):7470. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91750-1.
8
Online social activity time predicts ADHD problems in youth from late childhood to early adolescence in the ABCD study.在青少年大脑认知发展研究(ABCD研究)中,网络社交活动时间可预测儿童晚期至青少年早期的青少年多动症问题。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 26. doi: 10.1007/s00787-024-02620-6.
9
Alterations in functional connectivity in the salience network shared by depressive symptoms and smartphone overuse.抑郁症状和智能手机过度使用共享的突显网络中功能连接的改变。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 19;14(1):28679. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79951-6.
10
Pubic hair removal practices among women: Findings from a U.S. nationally representative survey.女性阴部毛发去除实践:一项来自美国全国代表性调查的研究结果。
Womens Health (Lond). 2024 Jan-Dec;20:17455057241296982. doi: 10.1177/17455057241296982.

社交媒体习惯性查看行为与大脑功能纵向发育的关联。

Association of Habitual Checking Behaviors on Social Media With Longitudinal Functional Brain Development.

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.

出版信息

JAMA Pediatr. 2023 Feb 1;177(2):160-167. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.4924.

DOI:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.4924
PMID:36595277
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9857400/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Social media platforms provide adolescents with unprecedented opportunities for social interactions during a critical developmental period when the brain is especially sensitive to social feedback.

OBJECTIVE

To explore how adolescents' frequency of checking behaviors on social media platforms is associated with longitudinal changes in functional brain development across adolescence.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A 3-year longitudinal cohort study of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) among sixth- and seventh-grade students recruited from 3 public middle schools in rural North Carolina.

EXPOSURES

At wave 1, participants reported the frequency at which they checked Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat.

MAIN OUTCOME OR MEASURE

Neural responses to the Social Incentive Delay task when anticipating receiving social feedback, measured annually using fMRI for 3 years. Participants saw a cue that indicated whether the social feedback (adolescent faces with emotional expressions) would be a reward, punishment, or neutral; after a delay, a target appeared and students responded by pressing a button as quickly as possible; a display of social feedback depended on trial type and reaction time.

RESULTS

Of 178 participants recruited at age 12 years, 169 participants (mean [SD] age, 12.89 [0.58] years; range, 11.93-14.52 years; 91 [53.8%] female; 38 [22.5%] Black, 60 [35.5%] Latinx, 50 [29.6%] White, 15 [8.9%] multiracial) met the inclusion criteria. Participants with habitual social media checking behaviors showed lower neural sensitivity to social anticipation at age 12 years compared with those with nonhabitual checking behaviors in the left amygdala, posterior insula (PI), and ventral striatum (VS; β, -0.22; 95% CI, -0.33 to -0.11), right amygdala (β, -0.19; 95% CI, -0.30 to -0.08), right anterior insula (AI; β, -0.23; 95% CI, -0.37 to -0.09), and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC; β, -0.29; 95% CI, -0.44 to -0.14). Among those with habitual checking behaviors, there were longitudinal increases in the left amygdala/PI/VS (β, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.18), right amygdala (β, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.16), right AI (β, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.20), and left DLPFC (β, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.25) during social anticipation, whereas among those with nonhabitual checking behaviors, longitudinal decreases were seen in the left amygdala/PI/VS (β, -0.12; 95% CI, -0.19 to -0.06), right amygdala (β, -0.10; 95% CI, -0.17 to -0.03), right AI (β, -0.13; 95% CI, -0.22 to -0.04), and left DLPFC (β, -0.10, 95% CI, -0.22 to -0.03).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The results of this cohort study suggest that social media checking behaviors in early adolescence may be associated with changes in the brain's sensitivity to social rewards and punishments. Further research examining long-term associations between social media use, adolescent neural development, and psychological adjustment is needed to understand the effects of a ubiquitous influence on development for today's adolescents.

摘要

重要性

社交媒体平台为青少年在大脑对社会反馈特别敏感的关键发育时期提供了前所未有的社交互动机会。

目的

探索青少年在社交媒体平台上检查行为的频率如何与青少年期功能性大脑发育的纵向变化相关。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项为期 3 年的功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)纵向队列研究,参与者为来自北卡罗来纳州农村的 3 所公立中学的六年级和七年级学生。

暴露

在第 1 波,参与者报告了他们检查 Facebook、Instagram 和 Snapchat 的频率。

主要结果或测量

使用 fMRI 每年测量 3 年,在预期收到社会反馈时对社会激励延迟任务的神经反应。参与者看到一个提示,表明社会反馈(带有情绪表达的青少年面孔)是奖励、惩罚还是中性;延迟后,目标出现,学生尽快按下按钮做出反应;社会反馈的显示取决于试验类型和反应时间。

结果

在招募时年龄为 12 岁的 178 名参与者中,169 名参与者(平均[SD]年龄为 12.89[0.58]岁;范围为 11.93-14.52 岁;91[53.8%]名女性;38[22.5%]名黑人,60[35.5%]拉丁裔,50[29.6%]名白人,15[8.9%]名混血儿)符合纳入标准。与非习惯性检查行为者相比,习惯性检查行为者在 12 岁时左杏仁核、后岛叶(PI)和腹侧纹状体(VS;β,-0.22;95%CI,-0.33 至-0.11)、右杏仁核(β,-0.19;95%CI,-0.30 至-0.08)、右前岛叶(AI;β,-0.23;95%CI,-0.37 至-0.09)和左背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC;β,-0.29;95%CI,-0.44 至-0.14)对社会预期的神经敏感性较低。在习惯性检查行为者中,左杏仁核/PI/VS(β,0.11;95%CI,0.04 至 0.18)、右杏仁核(β,0.09;95%CI,0.02 至 0.16)、右 AI(β,0.15;95%CI,0.02 至 0.20)和左 DLPFC(β,0.19;95%CI,0.05 至 0.25)在社会预期期间的纵向增加,而在非习惯性检查行为者中,左杏仁核/PI/VS(β,-0.12;95%CI,-0.19 至-0.06)、右杏仁核(β,-0.10;95%CI,-0.17 至-0.03)、右 AI(β,-0.13;95%CI,-0.22 至-0.04)和左 DLPFC(β,-0.10,95%CI,-0.22 至-0.03)的纵向减少。

结论和相关性

这项队列研究的结果表明,青少年早期的社交媒体检查行为可能与大脑对社会奖励和惩罚的敏感性变化有关。需要进一步研究社交媒体使用、青少年神经发育和心理适应之间的长期关联,以了解当今青少年普遍存在的对发展的影响。