Department of Psychology, Harvard University.
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health.
Emotion. 2023 Sep;23(6):1796-1801. doi: 10.1037/emo0001198. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
Research into correlates and predictors of emotion regulation has focused almost exclusively on individual differences and the immediate situation. Here, we consider whether features of macro-social contexts may also shape emotion regulation. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a longitudinal study of 502 gay and bisexual men living in 269 U.S. counties that varied in the level of stigma surrounding sexual minorities. We find that gay and bisexual men living in higher- (vs. lower-) stigma counties consistently reported more suppression, which consequently explained longitudinal increases (vs. decreases) in their lack of emotional clarity over 24 months. Results were robust to demographic characteristics, stigma at the interpersonal level (i.e., sexual orientation-related discrimination), and another form of social inequality (i.e., county-level income inequality). These findings suggest that broadening the lens of emotion regulation research to include characteristics of the macro-social environment may yield new insights into determinants of emotion regulation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
对情绪调节的相关因素和预测因素的研究几乎完全集中在个体差异和当前情境上。在这里,我们考虑宏观社会环境的特征是否也可能影响情绪调节。为了检验这一假设,我们对 502 名居住在美国 269 个县的男同性恋和双性恋男性进行了一项纵向研究,这些县在围绕性少数群体的污名程度上存在差异。我们发现,生活在污名程度较高(而非较低)的县的男同性恋和双性恋男性报告的抑制情绪的情况更为普遍,这反过来又解释了他们在 24 个月内情绪清晰度的纵向增加(而非减少)。研究结果在人口统计学特征、人际层面的污名(即与性取向相关的歧视)和另一种社会不平等形式(即县级收入不平等)方面具有稳健性。这些发现表明,将情绪调节研究的视角扩大到包括宏观社会环境的特征,可能会为情绪调节的决定因素提供新的见解。