Department of Psychology, Harvard University.
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2022 Aug;90(8):638-646. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000749.
Gay and bisexual men have significantly higher rates of depression than heterosexual men. The minority stress theory (Meyer, 2003) proposed that distal minority stressors, like interpersonal discrimination, contribute to this disparity. The psychological mediation framework (Hatzenbuehler, 2009) posited several psychosocial mechanisms through which distal minority stress creates elevations in depression among sexual minorities. Despite accumulating support for this framework, there are a number of limitations to existing research, including largely relying on cross-sectional designs; focusing on a small subset of mechanisms and moderators; and using nonprobability samples.
We recruited a sample of gay and bisexual men (N = 502) obtained from a population-based data set of U.S. adults. Participants completed validated measures of distal minority stress (i.e., interpersonal discrimination), psychosocial mechanisms (i.e., rumination, emotional clarity, and social support), identity-related moderators (i.e., identity centrality, stigma consciousness, and sexual orientation identity), and depressive symptoms at baseline, 6-month follow-up, and 1-year follow-up.
Rumination (b = 0.38, 95% CI [0.13, 0.84]), lack of emotional clarity (b = 0.43, 95% CI [0.11, 0.83]), and lack of social support (b = 0.21, 95% CI [0.04, 0.45]) each individually mediated the prospective relationship between interpersonal discrimination and depressive symptoms, controlling for initial symptoms, age, and education. These indirect effects were not moderated by identity-related characteristics or sexual identity.
Our study provides some of the strongest empirical evidence for the psychological mediation framework to date and suggests targets for interventions focused on reducing the mental health consequences of minority stress for sexual minority men. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
男同性恋和双性恋者的抑郁率明显高于异性恋男性。少数群体应激理论(Meyer,2003)提出,人际歧视等远端少数群体应激源导致了这种差异。心理中介框架(Hatzenbuehler,2009)提出了几个社会心理机制,通过这些机制,远端少数群体应激会导致性少数群体的抑郁情绪升高。尽管该框架得到了越来越多的支持,但现有研究仍存在一些局限性,包括主要依赖于横断面设计;只关注少数机制和调节因素;以及使用非概率样本。
我们招募了一组男同性恋和双性恋者(N=502),他们来自美国成年人的一个基于人群的数据组。参与者在基线、6 个月随访和 1 年随访时完成了远端少数群体应激(即人际歧视)、心理社会机制(即反刍思维、情绪清晰度和社会支持)、与身份相关的调节因素(即身份中心、污名意识和性取向认同)以及抑郁症状的验证性测量。
反刍思维(b=0.38,95%置信区间[0.13,0.84])、情绪清晰度缺乏(b=0.43,95%置信区间[0.11,0.83])和社会支持缺乏(b=0.21,95%置信区间[0.04,0.45])各自单独中介了人际歧视与抑郁症状之间的前瞻性关系,控制了初始症状、年龄和教育。这些间接效应不受与身份相关的特征或性身份的调节。
我们的研究为心理中介框架提供了迄今为止最强的实证证据,并为关注减少性少数群体应激对性少数群体男性心理健康后果的干预措施提供了目标。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。