• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高沙特阿拉伯吉赞武装部队医院对血培养指征、操作流程和资源利用的认识。

Improving awareness of blood culture indication, procedure and resource Utilization at Armed Forces Hospital Jizan, Saudi Arabia.

机构信息

Laboratory, Armed Forces Hospital Jizan, Jizan, Saudi Arabia

Medical Laboratory, Armed Forces Hospital Jizan, Jizan, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Jan;12(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002150.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002150
PMID:36596642
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9815004/
Abstract

Blood culture contamination (BCC) is a significant quality and safety issue in hospitals, as it leads to increase in unnecessary testing, admissions, antibiotic exposure and cost. This study is the first study on the BCC rates in Armed Forces Hospital Jizan (AFHJ), Saudi Arabia. The main goal of our quality improvement (QI) project was to reduce BCC rate in AFHJ from 7.5% to international benchmark (<3%) after January 2021 as well as to reduce the negativity rate. This study was conducted in AFHJ (KSA) including two major steps: first, development and implementation of QI interventions to reduce BCC and negativity rate in the AFHJ. Second, evaluation of the effectiveness of these interventions. The intervention was developed through QI methodologies, including fishbone diagramming and the plan-do-study-act cycle. Intervention effectiveness was evaluated using an interrupted time series analysis. Clear survey questionnaires were made and distributed to participants to get preaudit results.Then we started the education programme depending on the preaudit results. Soft copy of written steps of blood collection procedure and indication was done and sent to nurses and physicians. After that, direct observations of nurses involved in the process were conducted. Finally, post-training assessment using previous survey questionnaires was performed to get postaudit results. During the baseline period (preintervention period), 7.5% from blood culture were contaminated, compared with 1.8% during the intervention period (postintervention period). Rate of negative blood culture was reduced from 96% to 91%. Overall improvement of knowledge and awareness of the nurses and physicians clearly noted after intervention implementation. Fortunately, we have noted that the budget of microbiology would be reduced by 10%-12% as a result of our interventions. By standardising blood culture collection methods, optimising blood volume and nurses' education, we were able to develop a best practice for blood culture collection and to reduce BCC and negativity rate to a sustainable low rate at our hospital.

摘要

血培养污染(BCC)是医院中一个重大的质量和安全问题,因为它会导致不必要的检测、住院、抗生素暴露和成本增加。这项研究是沙特阿拉伯吉赞武装部队医院(AFHJ)首次进行的血培养污染率研究。我们的质量改进(QI)项目的主要目标是在 2021 年 1 月之后将 AFHJ 的血培养污染率从 7.5%降低至国际基准(<3%),并降低阴性率。这项研究在 AFHJ(沙特阿拉伯)进行,包括两个主要步骤:首先,开发和实施 QI 干预措施,以降低 AFHJ 的血培养污染率和阴性率。其次,评估这些干预措施的效果。通过 QI 方法,包括鱼骨图和计划-实施-研究-行动循环,制定了干预措施。通过中断时间序列分析评估干预措施的有效性。制定了明确的调查问卷并分发给参与者以获得预审计结果。然后根据预审计结果开始教育计划。完成了血样采集程序和指示的书面步骤的软拷贝,并分发给护士和医生。之后,对参与该过程的护士进行了直接观察。最后,使用之前的调查问卷进行培训后评估,以获得后审计结果。在基线期(干预前),7.5%的血培养标本被污染,而干预期(干预后)则为 1.8%。阴性血培养率从 96%降至 91%。干预实施后,护士和医生的知识和意识明显提高。幸运的是,我们注意到由于我们的干预措施,微生物学的预算将减少 10%-12%。通过标准化血培养采集方法、优化血容量和护士教育,我们能够为血培养采集制定最佳实践,并将 BCC 和阴性率降低到我们医院的可持续低水平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a2/9815004/8c9d2380dcc1/bmjoq-2022-002150f13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a2/9815004/b366c472bc5b/bmjoq-2022-002150f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a2/9815004/776b178ee1a6/bmjoq-2022-002150f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a2/9815004/3a4b3e38c265/bmjoq-2022-002150f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a2/9815004/9f21b63033ea/bmjoq-2022-002150f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a2/9815004/9db6977dfada/bmjoq-2022-002150f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a2/9815004/05c1d5d026a3/bmjoq-2022-002150f06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a2/9815004/c8829b4b8a7e/bmjoq-2022-002150f07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a2/9815004/6cc79861d002/bmjoq-2022-002150f08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a2/9815004/7bd8ea9ca983/bmjoq-2022-002150f09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a2/9815004/29c2f5c07543/bmjoq-2022-002150f10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a2/9815004/f54a883eec16/bmjoq-2022-002150f11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a2/9815004/5aac8b344bd3/bmjoq-2022-002150f12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a2/9815004/8c9d2380dcc1/bmjoq-2022-002150f13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a2/9815004/b366c472bc5b/bmjoq-2022-002150f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a2/9815004/776b178ee1a6/bmjoq-2022-002150f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a2/9815004/3a4b3e38c265/bmjoq-2022-002150f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a2/9815004/9f21b63033ea/bmjoq-2022-002150f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a2/9815004/9db6977dfada/bmjoq-2022-002150f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a2/9815004/05c1d5d026a3/bmjoq-2022-002150f06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a2/9815004/c8829b4b8a7e/bmjoq-2022-002150f07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a2/9815004/6cc79861d002/bmjoq-2022-002150f08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a2/9815004/7bd8ea9ca983/bmjoq-2022-002150f09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a2/9815004/29c2f5c07543/bmjoq-2022-002150f10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a2/9815004/f54a883eec16/bmjoq-2022-002150f11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a2/9815004/5aac8b344bd3/bmjoq-2022-002150f12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a2/9815004/8c9d2380dcc1/bmjoq-2022-002150f13.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving awareness of blood culture indication, procedure and resource Utilization at Armed Forces Hospital Jizan, Saudi Arabia.提高沙特阿拉伯吉赞武装部队医院对血培养指征、操作流程和资源利用的认识。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Jan;12(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002150.
2
Rationalisation of laboratory tests ordering and consumption at Armed Forces Hospital, Jazan.沙特阿拉伯武装部队医院贾赞分院检验申请和检验量合理化。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Jun;12(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002114.
3
Improving adherence to facility protocol and reducing blood culture contamination in an intensive care unit: A quality improvement project.提高重症监护病房对设施方案的依从性并减少血培养污染:一项质量改进项目。
Aust Crit Care. 2020 Nov;33(6):546-552. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2020.03.002. Epub 2020 May 13.
4
A Quality Improvement Initiative: Reducing Blood Culture Contamination in a Children's Hospital.一项质量改进计划:降低儿童医院血培养污染率。
Pediatrics. 2018 Oct;142(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-0244. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
5
Effects of a team Quality Improvement method in a national clinical audit programme of four clinical specialties in Ministry of Health hospitals in Saudi Arabia.团队质量改进方法在沙特阿拉伯卫生部医院四个临床专科全国临床审计项目中的效果。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2024 Feb 5;36(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad107.
6
A pre-experimental pilot study exploring EBP Beliefs and EBP Implementation among post-graduate student nurses in Saudi Arabia.一项探索沙特阿拉伯研究生护士的 EBP 信念和 EBP 实施情况的预实验性试点研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2021 Nov;57:103215. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103215. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
7
Assessing the Organizational Characteristics Influencing Quality Improvement Implementation in Saudi Hospitals.评估影响沙特医院质量改进实施的组织特征。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2018 Jan/Mar;27(1):8-16. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000152.
8
Nurses' Perceptions of Patient Safety Culture in Three Hospitals in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯三家医院护士对患者安全文化的认知。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2018 Jul;50(4):422-431. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12394. Epub 2018 May 14.
9
Reducing blood culture contamination in the emergency department: an interrupted time series quality improvement study.降低急诊科血培养污染:一项间断时间序列质量改进研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;20(1):89-97. doi: 10.1111/acem.12057.
10
Reducing blood culture contamination in community hospital emergency departments: a multicenter evaluation of a quality improvement intervention.降低社区医院急诊科血培养污染:一项质量改进干预的多中心评估。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Mar;21(3):274-82. doi: 10.1111/acem.12337.

本文引用的文献

1
Updated review of blood culture contamination.血培养污染的最新综述。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006 Oct;19(4):788-802. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00062-05.
2
National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004.国家医院感染监测(NNIS)系统报告,1992年1月至2004年6月数据总结,2004年10月发布。
Am J Infect Control. 2004 Dec;32(8):470-85. doi: 10.1016/S0196655304005425.
3
Sources of preventable errors related to transfusion.与输血相关的可预防错误的来源。
Vox Sang. 2001 Jul;81(1):37-41. doi: 10.1046/j.1423-0410.2001.00057.x.
4
Blood cultures positive for coagulase-negative staphylococci: antisepsis, pseudobacteremia, and therapy of patients.凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌血培养阳性:患者的抗菌、假菌血症及治疗
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Jul;36(7):1923-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.7.1923-1926.1998.
5
Impact of a false positive blood culture result on the management of febrile children.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997 Sep;16(9):846-51. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199709000-00006.
6
Antimicrobial misuse in patients with positive blood cultures.血培养阳性患者的抗菌药物滥用情况。
Am J Med. 1989 Sep;87(3):253-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(89)80146-9.
7
Contaminant blood cultures and resource utilization. The true consequences of false-positive results.污染血培养与资源利用。假阳性结果的真实后果。
JAMA. 1991 Jan 16;265(3):365-9.