Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Radiology, Kanaji Thyroid Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Endocrine. 2023 Jun;80(3):589-599. doi: 10.1007/s12020-023-03300-2. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
The role of adjuvant external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in the treatment of locally advanced papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) remains controversial due to the lack of prospective data and the conflicting retrospective data. This study aimed to determine the benefits of adjuvant EBRT in patients with PTC and other organ invasions using propensity score matching to reduce the heterogeneity of the patient population.
Data from patients with PTC with other organ invasions but no distant metastases who underwent surgery and adjuvant radioactive iodine (RAI) alone (Non-EBRT group) or adjuvant EBRT plus RAI (EBRT group) were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity matching was used to reduce heterogeneity. Survival outcomes and toxicities associated with EBRT were evaluated.
Between January 2005 and December 2019, 102 patients in the Non-EBRT group and 26 patients in the EBRT group were evaluated. In the 48 propensity score-matched patients, no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the Non-EBRT and EBRT groups were detected. The locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were significantly higher in the EBRT group compared with the rates in the Non-EBRT group (5y-LRRFS: 100% vs. 74%, p = 0.003, 5y-RFS: 91% vs. 74%, p = 0.035). EBRT was well-tolerated, with no grade ≥ 3 toxicity, and all patients completed the therapy as planned.
Adjuvant EBRT plus RAI exhibited acceptable toxicity and improved LRRFS and RFS in patients with PTC with other organ invasions compared with RAI alone.
由于缺乏前瞻性数据和相互矛盾的回顾性数据,辅助外部束放疗(EBRT)在局部晚期甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)治疗中的作用仍存在争议。本研究旨在通过倾向评分匹配来减少患者人群的异质性,确定辅助 EBRT 在伴有其他器官侵犯但无远处转移的 PTC 患者中的获益。
回顾性分析了接受手术和单独辅助放射性碘(RAI)治疗(非 EBRT 组)或辅助 EBRT 加 RAI 治疗(EBRT 组)的伴有其他器官侵犯但无远处转移的 PTC 患者的数据。采用倾向评分匹配来减少异质性。评估了 EBRT 相关的生存结果和毒性。
2005 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月,非 EBRT 组 102 例患者和 EBRT 组 26 例患者接受了评估。在 48 例经倾向评分匹配的患者中,非 EBRT 组和 EBRT 组之间的基线特征无显著差异。EBRT 组的局部区域无复发生存率(LRRFS)和无复发生存率(RFS)明显高于非 EBRT 组(5y-LRRFS:100%比 74%,p=0.003;5y-RFS:91%比 74%,p=0.035)。EBRT 耐受性良好,无任何≥3 级毒性,所有患者均按计划完成了治疗。
与单独 RAI 相比,辅助 EBRT 加 RAI 可在伴有其他器官侵犯的 PTC 患者中表现出可接受的毒性,并提高 LRRFS 和 RFS。