Research Center for Health Promotion, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
Migration and Cultural Diversity Team, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Finland.
Scand J Public Health. 2023 May;51(3):490-498. doi: 10.1177/14034948221144660. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
Previous research indicates that foreign-born populations experience more psychological distress than general populations. However, it remains unclear how prevalence varies between regions of origin. The role of socio-demographic and migration-related factors also needs to be further investigated. We aimed to (a) compare the prevalence of psychological distress in foreign-born and general Finnish populations, (b) investigate differences in prevalence between nine regions of origin and (c) examine which socio-demographic and migration-related factors are associated with distress among foreign-born populations.
The study used data from the Survey on Well-Being among Foreign Born Population (FinMonik), a population-based survey (=6312) of foreign-born populations living in Finland collected between 2018 and 2019 by the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare. Psychological distress was measured using the Mental Health Inventory-5 (MHI-5), with a cut-off point of 52. Logistic regression was used to adjust analyses by age and sex to determine the prevalence of psychological distress and the associated socio-demographic factors.
Psychological distress was more prevalent among those who were foreign born (17.4%) than among the general population (12.9%). Migrants from the Middle East and North Africa had the highest prevalence (29.7%) compared to other regions of origin. Unemployment or economic inactivity, international protection as a reason for migration and beginner-level language proficiency were the main factors increasing the odds for distress among foreign-born populations.
Foreign-born populations experience more psychological distress than the general population, but prevalence varies between regions of origin. Future efforts should aim at a better understanding of the mental health risk factors and the development of targeted interventions for these subpopulations.
先前的研究表明,出生在国外的人群比一般人群经历更多的心理困扰。然而,其发病的流行率在原籍地区之间的差异仍不清楚。社会人口学和与移民相关的因素的作用也需要进一步研究。我们旨在:(a)比较出生在国外和一般芬兰人群中的心理困扰的流行率,(b)调查原籍地区之间流行率的差异,以及 (c)检验哪些社会人口学和与移民相关的因素与出生在国外的人群中的困扰有关。
本研究使用了芬兰健康福利研究所于 2018 年至 2019 年期间进行的一项基于人群的对居住在芬兰的出生在国外的人群(FinMonik)的幸福感调查的数据。使用心理健康量表-5(MHI-5)衡量心理困扰,其切点为 52。采用逻辑回归调整年龄和性别分析,以确定心理困扰的流行率和相关社会人口学因素。
与一般人群(12.9%)相比,出生在国外的人群(17.4%)的心理困扰更为普遍。与其他原籍地区相比,来自中东和北非的移民的流行率最高(29.7%)。失业或不活跃、作为移民原因的国际保护以及初级语言水平是增加出生在国外的人群困扰几率的主要因素。
出生在国外的人群比一般人群经历更多的心理困扰,但原籍地区之间的流行率存在差异。未来的努力应旨在更好地理解心理健康风险因素,并为这些亚人群制定有针对性的干预措施。