Xepapadaki Paraskevi, Adachi Yuichi, Pozo Beltrán César Fireth, El-Sayed Zeinab A, Gómez René Maximiliano, Hossny Elham, Filipovic Ivana, Le Souef Peter, Morais-Almeida Mário, Miligkos Michael, Nieto Antonio, Phipatanakul Wanda, Pitrez Paulo M, Wang Jiu-Yao, Wong Gary W K, Papadopoulos Nikolaos G
Allergy Department, 2nd Pediatric Clinic, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyam, Japan.
World Allergy Organ J. 2022 Dec 15;16(1):100727. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2022.100727. eCollection 2023 Jan.
Asthma imposes a heavy morbidity burden during childhood; it affects over 10% of children in Europe and North America and it is estimated to exceed 400 million people worldwide by the year 2025. In clinical practice, diagnosis of asthma in children is mostly based on clinical criteria; nevertheless, assessment of both physiological and pathological processes through biomarkers, support asthma diagnosis, aid monitoring, and further lead to better treatment outcomes and reduced morbidity. Recently, identification and validation of biomarkers in pediatric asthma has emerged as a top priority across leading experts, researchers, and clinicians. Moreover, the implementation of non-invasive biomarkers for the assessment and monitoring of paediatric patients with asthma, has been prioritized; however, only a proportion of them are currently included in the clinical practise. Although, the use of non-invasive biomarkers is highly supported in recent asthma guidelines for documenting diagnosis and supporting monitoring of asthmatic patients, data on the Pediatric population are limited. In the present report, the Pediatric Asthma Committee of the World Allergy Organization (WAO), aims to summarize and discuss available data for the implementation of non-invasive biomarkers in the diagnosis and monitoring in children with asthma. Information on the most studied biomarkers, including spirometry, oscillometry, markers of allergic sensitization, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, and the most recent exhaled breath markers and "omic" approaches, will be reviewed. Practical limitations and considerations based on both experts' opinion and critical review of the literature, on the utility of all "well-known" and newly introduced non-invasive biomarkers will be presented. A critical commentary on biomarkers' use in diagnosing and monitoring asthma during the COVID-19 pandemic, cost and availability of biomarkers in different settings and in developing countries, the differences on the biomarkers use between Primary Practitioners, Pediatricians, and Specialists and their role on the longitudinal aspect of asthma is provided.
哮喘在儿童期造成了沉重的发病负担;在欧洲和北美,超过10%的儿童受其影响,据估计,到2025年全球哮喘患者将超过4亿。在临床实践中,儿童哮喘的诊断主要基于临床标准;然而,通过生物标志物评估生理和病理过程,有助于哮喘的诊断、监测,并进一步带来更好的治疗效果和降低发病率。最近,儿科哮喘生物标志物的识别和验证已成为顶尖专家、研究人员和临床医生的首要任务。此外,优先考虑采用非侵入性生物标志物来评估和监测哮喘患儿;然而,目前只有一部分生物标志物被纳入临床实践。尽管最近的哮喘指南高度支持使用非侵入性生物标志物来记录哮喘患者的诊断和支持监测,但关于儿科人群的数据有限。在本报告中,世界过敏组织(WAO)儿科哮喘委员会旨在总结和讨论在哮喘患儿诊断和监测中实施非侵入性生物标志物的现有数据。将回顾有关研究最多的生物标志物的信息,包括肺功能测定、振荡法、过敏致敏标志物、呼出一氧化氮分数,以及最新的呼出气标志物和“组学”方法。将根据专家意见和对文献的批判性综述,介绍所有“知名”和新引入的非侵入性生物标志物在实用性方面的实际局限性和注意事项。还提供了关于生物标志物在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间用于诊断和监测哮喘的批判性评论、不同环境和发展中国家生物标志物的成本和可及性、初级从业者、儿科医生和专科医生在生物标志物使用上的差异及其在哮喘纵向病程中的作用。