• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用临床试验注册库的逆概率加权法调整荟萃分析中的发表偏倚。

Adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis via inverse probability weighting using clinical trial registries.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Statistics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.

Graduate School of Engineering Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Biometrics. 2023 Sep;79(3):2089-2102. doi: 10.1111/biom.13822. Epub 2023 Jan 17.

DOI:10.1111/biom.13822
PMID:36602873
Abstract

Publication bias is a major concern in conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Various sensitivity analysis or bias-correction methods have been developed based on selection models, and they have some advantages over the widely used trim-and-fill bias-correction method. However, likelihood methods based on selection models may have difficulty in obtaining precise estimates and reasonable confidence intervals, or require a rather complicated sensitivity analysis process. Herein, we develop a simple publication bias adjustment method by utilizing the information on conducted but still unpublished trials from clinical trial registries. We introduce an estimating equation for parameter estimation in the selection function by regarding the publication bias issue as a missing data problem under the missing not at random assumption. With the estimated selection function, we introduce the inverse probability weighting (IPW) method to estimate the overall mean across studies. Furthermore, the IPW versions of heterogeneity measures such as the between-study variance and the I measure are proposed. We propose methods to construct confidence intervals based on asymptotic normal approximation as well as on parametric bootstrap. Through numerical experiments, we observed that the estimators successfully eliminated bias, and the confidence intervals had empirical coverage probabilities close to the nominal level. On the other hand, the confidence interval based on asymptotic normal approximation is much wider in some scenarios than the bootstrap confidence interval. Therefore, the latter is recommended for practical use.

摘要

发表偏倚是进行系统评价和荟萃分析的主要关注点。已经基于选择模型开发了各种敏感性分析或偏差校正方法,它们相对于广泛使用的修剪和填充偏差校正方法具有一些优势。然而,基于选择模型的似然方法可能难以获得精确的估计值和合理的置信区间,或者需要相当复杂的敏感性分析过程。在此,我们开发了一种简单的发表偏倚调整方法,利用临床试验注册机构中已进行但尚未发表的试验信息。我们通过将发表偏倚问题视为缺失数据问题(在非随机缺失假设下),引入了一个用于选择函数参数估计的估计方程。通过估计的选择函数,我们引入逆概率加权(Inverse Probability Weighting,简称 IPW)方法来估计研究之间的总体平均值。此外,我们还提出了基于异质性度量(如研究间方差和 I 度量)的 IPW 版本。我们提出了基于渐近正态逼近和参数自举的置信区间构建方法。通过数值实验,我们观察到估计器成功消除了偏差,并且置信区间的经验覆盖率接近名义水平。另一方面,在某些情况下,基于渐近正态逼近的置信区间比自举置信区间宽得多。因此,建议在实际应用中使用后者。

相似文献

1
Adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis via inverse probability weighting using clinical trial registries.利用临床试验注册库的逆概率加权法调整荟萃分析中的发表偏倚。
Biometrics. 2023 Sep;79(3):2089-2102. doi: 10.1111/biom.13822. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Using clinical trial registries to inform Copas selection model for publication bias in meta-analysis.利用临床试验注册库为 Copas 选择模型提供信息,以评估荟萃分析中的发表偏倚。
Res Synth Methods. 2021 Sep;12(5):658-673. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1506. Epub 2021 Jul 4.
4
The trim-and-fill method for publication bias: practical guidelines and recommendations based on a large database of meta-analyses.用于发表偏倚的修剪与填充法:基于大型荟萃分析数据库的实用指南与建议
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jun;98(23):e15987. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015987.
5
Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity.在存在发表偏倚和研究间异质性的情况下,修剪和填充方法的性能。
Stat Med. 2007 Nov 10;26(25):4544-62. doi: 10.1002/sim.2889.
6
Detecting and correcting for publication bias in meta-analysis - A truncated normal distribution approach.检测和纠正荟萃分析中的发表偏倚——一种截断正态分布方法。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Sep;27(9):2722-2741. doi: 10.1177/0962280216684671. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
7
Data-Adaptive Selection of the Propensity Score Truncation Level for Inverse-Probability-Weighted and Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimators of Marginal Point Treatment Effects.数据自适应选择倾向评分截断水平对边际点处理效应的逆概率加权和有偏极大似然估计。
Am J Epidemiol. 2022 Aug 22;191(9):1640-1651. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac087.
8
Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses.发表偏倚对荟萃分析影响的实证评估。
BMJ. 2000 Jun 10;320(7249):1574-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7249.1574.
9
Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis.修剪与填充:一种基于漏斗图的简单方法,用于在荟萃分析中检测和校正发表偏倚。
Biometrics. 2000 Jun;56(2):455-63. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x.
10
Extent of non-publication in cohorts of studies approved by research ethics committees or included in trial registries.经研究伦理委员会批准或纳入试验注册的研究队列中的未发表情况。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 23;9(12):e114023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114023. eCollection 2014.