• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对杂志和新闻中依赖距离最小化的历时趋势的调查。

An investigation of the diachronic trend of dependency distance minimization in magazines and news.

机构信息

School of Foreign Languages, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, Jilin, PRC.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Jan 5;18(1):e0279836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279836. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0279836
PMID:36602964
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9815589/
Abstract

The principle of minimization of dependency distance (DD) can reduce the working memory burden of language speakers, that is, reduce the cognitive burden during the communication process. This investigation demonstrated the dependency distance (based on the dependency grammar) minimization principle from a diachronic perspective in two text types of magazines and news with inspection indicators of mean dependency distance (MDD) and normalized dependency distance (NDD). This research revealed a fluctuation tendency around a certain axis concerning diachronic dependency distance variation. This research also indicated that news text balances language complexity and communication efficiency better than magazine text.

摘要

依赖距离最小化原则(DD)可以减轻语言使用者的工作记忆负担,也就是说,减少交际过程中的认知负担。本研究从历时的角度,以杂志和新闻两种文本类型为研究对象,利用平均依赖距离(MDD)和归一化依赖距离(NDD)作为检验指标,展示了依存语法的依赖距离最小化原则。本研究揭示了历时依存距离变化围绕某一轴线的波动趋势。研究还表明,与杂志文本相比,新闻文本在语言复杂度和交际效率之间达到了更好的平衡。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7267/9815589/6ae18e9ef61f/pone.0279836.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7267/9815589/b29d31961c55/pone.0279836.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7267/9815589/7127c9e0d31d/pone.0279836.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7267/9815589/6d46f025a9e0/pone.0279836.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7267/9815589/af30c59d9edf/pone.0279836.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7267/9815589/d9963951990b/pone.0279836.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7267/9815589/fddc16d57e78/pone.0279836.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7267/9815589/6ae18e9ef61f/pone.0279836.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7267/9815589/b29d31961c55/pone.0279836.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7267/9815589/7127c9e0d31d/pone.0279836.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7267/9815589/6d46f025a9e0/pone.0279836.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7267/9815589/af30c59d9edf/pone.0279836.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7267/9815589/d9963951990b/pone.0279836.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7267/9815589/fddc16d57e78/pone.0279836.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7267/9815589/6ae18e9ef61f/pone.0279836.g007.jpg

相似文献

1
An investigation of the diachronic trend of dependency distance minimization in magazines and news.对杂志和新闻中依赖距离最小化的历时趋势的调查。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 5;18(1):e0279836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279836. eCollection 2023.
2
Task-based explanation for genre effects: Evidence from a dependency treebank.基于任务的体裁效应解释:来自依存树库的证据。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 23;18(8):e0290381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290381. eCollection 2023.
3
Word Order Typology Interacts With Linguistic Complexity: A Cross-Linguistic Corpus Study.语序类型学与语言复杂性相互作用:一项跨语言语料库研究。
Cogn Sci. 2020 Apr;44(4):e12822. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12822.
4
Dependency distance: A new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages.依存距离:自然语言句法模式的新视角。
Phys Life Rev. 2017 Jul;21:171-193. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
5
Large-scale evidence of dependency length minimization in 37 languages.37种语言中依存长度最小化的大规模证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Aug 18;112(33):10336-41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502134112. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
6
DDM at Work: Reply to comments on "Dependency distance: A new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages".DDM 在工作:对“依赖距离:自然语言句法模式的新视角”的评论回复。
Phys Life Rev. 2017 Jul;21:233-240. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
7
Generalizing dependency distance: Comment on "Dependency distance: A new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages" by Haitao Liu et al.推广依存距离:评刘海洋等的“依存距离:自然语言句法模式的新视角”
Phys Life Rev. 2017 Jul;21:197-199. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2017.06.023. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
8
Dependency distance minimization in understanding of ambiguous structure: Comment on "Dependency distance: A new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages" by Haitao Liu et al.理解歧义结构中的依存距离最小化:评刘海涛等人的《依存距离:自然语言句法模式的新视角》
Phys Life Rev. 2017 Jul;21:230-232. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
9
Dependency Distance Differences across Interpreting Types: Implications for Cognitive Demand.不同口译类型的依存距离差异:对认知需求的影响
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 12;8:2132. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02132. eCollection 2017.
10
Cross-language diversity, head-direction and grammars: Comment on "Dependency distance: A new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages" by Haitao Liu et al.跨语言多样性、头部方向与语法:评刘海涛等人的《依存距离:自然语言句法模式的新视角》
Phys Life Rev. 2017 Jul;21:204-206. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Jun 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Dependency Distance Differences across Interpreting Types: Implications for Cognitive Demand.不同口译类型的依存距离差异:对认知需求的影响
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 12;8:2132. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02132. eCollection 2017.
2
Dependency distance: A new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages.依存距离:自然语言句法模式的新视角。
Phys Life Rev. 2017 Jul;21:171-193. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
3
Large-scale evidence of dependency length minimization in 37 languages.37种语言中依存长度最小化的大规模证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Aug 18;112(33):10336-41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502134112. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
4
The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why?神奇的谜团之四:工作记忆容量是如何受限的,以及为何受限?
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2010 Feb 1;19(1):51-57. doi: 10.1177/0963721409359277.
5
The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.神奇的数字七,加二或减二:我们信息处理能力的某些局限。
Psychol Rev. 1956 Mar;63(2):81-97.