Vetrone Francesco, Marelli Stefano, Galimberti Andrea, Umbrello Michele, Gotti Miriam, Pezzi Angelo, Girombelli Alessandro
Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Policlinico di Monza, 20900 Monza, Italy.
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, ASST Nord Milano, Bassini Hospital, 20092 Cinisello Balsamo, Italy.
J Pers Med. 2025 Jun 3;15(6):230. doi: 10.3390/jpm15060230.
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) improves the quality of life by alleviating pain and restoring function. The optimal pain control with minimal muscle weakness is paramount for early rehabilitation and for reducing complications. Although PROSPECT and ICAROS guidelines recommend the Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB), it is associated with insufficient pain relief and a prolonged quadriceps motor block. The association of the PENG (Pericapsular Nerve Group) with LFCN (lateral femoral cutaneous nerve) blocks may address these limitations, provide improved motor-sparing pain control, and offer a more tailored approach that enhances both an early postoperative recovery and patient satisfaction. A randomized controlled trial (November 2023-July 2024) compared the PENG + LFCN to the FICB in patients undergoing elective THAs under spinal anesthesia. The primary outcome was quadriceps weakness at 6 h post-block. Secondary outcomes included the degree of hip flexion and pain scores at 6, 24, and 48 h post-block, opioid consumption, and time to ambulation. Fifty-eight patients were randomized (twenty-nine per group). The PENG + LFCN group achieved a significantly greater muscle strength (MRC: 4 [4; 4] vs. 3 [3; 4], < 0.0001) and better hip flexion at all measured moments (6 h: 45° [37; 60] vs. 30° [25; 43], 24h: 59° [49; 66] vs. 47° [36; 50], 48 h: 62° [55; 70] vs. 50° [40; 55], all < 0.0001). Resting pain was lower in the PENG + LFCN group (0 [0; 1], 0 [0; 2], and 0 [0; 1] vs. 2 [0; 3], 1 [0; 3], 1 [0; 3]), as was the dynamic pain during movement (1 [0; 2], 2 [2; 4], and 2 [1; 2] vs. 3 [2; 5], 3 [2; 4], and 3 [1; 3]; all < 0.001), along with a lower total opioid consumption (0 [0; 0] vs. 7.5 [7.5; 22.5] MME, < 0.001). The PENG + LFCN block outperformed the FICB in muscle strength, hip flexion, pain control, and opioid use, suggesting it may be a more effective option for THAs.
全髋关节置换术(THA)通过减轻疼痛和恢复功能来提高生活质量。以最小的肌肉无力实现最佳的疼痛控制对于早期康复和减少并发症至关重要。尽管PROSPECT和ICAROS指南推荐使用髂筋膜间隙阻滞(FICB),但它与疼痛缓解不足和股四头肌运动阻滞时间延长有关。PENG(关节周围神经组)与股外侧皮神经(LFCN)阻滞联合使用可能解决这些局限性,提供更好的保留运动功能的疼痛控制,并提供一种更具针对性的方法,从而加快术后早期恢复并提高患者满意度。一项随机对照试验(2023年11月至2024年7月)比较了在脊髓麻醉下接受择期THA的患者中PENG + LFCN与FICB的效果。主要结局是阻滞后6小时的股四头肌无力。次要结局包括阻滞后6、24和48小时的髋关节屈曲程度和疼痛评分、阿片类药物消耗量以及下床活动时间。58例患者被随机分组(每组29例)。PENG + LFCN组在所有测量时间点均实现了显著更强的肌肉力量(医学研究委员会评分:4[4;4]对3[3;4],<0.0001)和更好的髋关节屈曲(6小时:45°[37;60]对30°[25;43],24小时:59°[49;66]对47°[36;50],48小时:62°[55;70]对50°[40;55],均<0.0001)。PENG + LFCN组的静息痛更低(0[0;1]、0[0;2]和0[0;1]对2[0;3]、1[0;3]、1[0;3]),运动时的动态痛也更低(1[0;2]、2[2;4]和2[1;2]对3[2;5]、3[2;4]和3[1;3];均<0.001),同时阿片类药物总消耗量更低(0[0;0]对7.5[7.5;22.5]毫克吗啡当量,<0.001)。PENG + LFCN阻滞在肌肉力量、髋关节屈曲、疼痛控制和阿片类药物使用方面优于FICB,表明它可能是THA更有效的选择。