Batkhina Anastasia, Berry John W, Jurcik Tomas, Dubrov Dmitrii, Grigoryev Dmitry
Center for Sociocultural Research, HSE University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Eur J Psychol. 2022 Nov 30;18(4):369-390. doi: 10.5964/ejop.3715. eCollection 2022 Nov.
The creation of a social climate where all ethnic groups can harmoniously coexist is a central challenge for many countries today. Should we emphasize similarities and common ground or, conversely, recognize that there are important differences between groups? The current study examined relations between diversity ideologies (assimilation, colorblindness, multiculturalism, polyculturalism) and generalized and specific intergroup bias (against Chechens, Belarusians, Uzbeks, Chinese, and Jews and Muslims) among ethnic Russians (N = 701). In Study 1, colorblindness (ignoring differences) and polyculturalism (emphasizing interconnectivity) were associated with lower generalized intergroup bias and lower bias against Chechens, Uzbeks, and Chinese, but not Belarusians. Bias against Belarusians was lower among those who endorsed multiculturalism (emphasizing differences). In Study 2, multiculturalism was associated with higher implicit bias when the target was a Chechen but in general more proximal variables (positive or negative contact experience and perceived group similarity) were more robust predictors of intergroup bias than diversity ideologies. In Study 3, colorblindness and polyculturalism were related to lower levels of fearful attitudes against Muslims. Colorblindness was also associated with lower levels of Antisemitism in contrast to multiculturalism that had an opposite association. We place these results in the context of cultural distance and existing cultural stereotypes about different groups among the majority of Russians. The strengths and weaknesses of each diversity ideology for the mainstream cultural group are discussed. The results of the current study suggest that the most fruitful strategy for mainstream cultural groups for maintaining harmonious intergroup relations in diverse societies might be that of optimal distinctiveness.
营造一个所有族群都能和谐共处的社会环境,是当今许多国家面临的核心挑战。我们应该强调相似性和共同点,还是相反地,认识到不同群体之间存在重要差异呢?当前的研究考察了俄罗斯族(N = 701)中多样性意识形态(同化、色盲主义、多元文化主义、多文化主义)与一般性和特定的群体间偏见(针对车臣人、白俄罗斯人、乌兹别克人、中国人以及犹太人和穆斯林)之间的关系。在研究1中,色盲主义(忽视差异)和多文化主义(强调相互联系)与较低的一般性群体间偏见以及对车臣人、乌兹别克人和中国人较低的偏见相关,但与对白俄罗斯人的偏见无关。在认同多元文化主义(强调差异)的人群中,对白俄罗斯人的偏见较低。在研究2中,当目标是车臣人时,多元文化主义与较高的内隐偏见相关,但总体而言,更直接的变量(积极或消极的接触经历以及感知到的群体相似性)比多样性意识形态更能有力地预测群体间偏见。在研究3中,色盲主义和多文化主义与对穆斯林较低的恐惧态度相关。与具有相反关联的多元文化主义相比,色盲主义也与较低水平的反犹主义相关。我们将这些结果置于俄罗斯多数群体中不同群体的文化距离和现有文化刻板印象的背景下进行考量。讨论了每种多样性意识形态对主流文化群体的优缺点。当前研究的结果表明,主流文化群体在多元社会中维持和谐群体间关系的最有效策略可能是最佳独特性策略。