Yang H, An R, Clarke C V, Shen J
Department of Physical Education, Capital University of Economics and Business, China.
Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, United States.
Public Health. 2023 Feb;215:17-26. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.11.020. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
This study systematically reviewed scientific evidence regarding the impact of economic growth on physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviors.
A keyword and reference search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and EBSCO from the inception of an electronic bibliographic database to November 2021. Studies that met all of the following criteria were included in the review: (1) study designs: observational studies; (2) study subjects: people of all ages; (3) exposure: macroeconomic growth; (4) outcomes: PA or sedentary behaviors/sitting time.
15 studies were identified. Eight among 12 studies found economic growth positively associated with at least one domain/measure of PA, whereas the remaining four found an inverse relationship. One of two studies examined the association of economic growth and physical inactivity found a positive relationship, while another found no significant relationship. Four studies examined the associations between economic growth and sedentary behaviors, and the results were inconclusive. The impact of economic growth on PA is through three main pathways-(a) building and maintaining parks and green spaces, (b) adoption of the modern workplace and high technology, and (c) motorized transportation.
Building and maintaining parks and green spaces can effectively promote leisure time physical activity and active commute in developed countries, whereas promoting workplace and transportation-related PA could be prioritized in developing nations. Future research calls for longitudinal study design and further exploration of macro-environmental factors. Policymakers and stakeholders should be informed about the potential PA reduction resulting from economic growth and develop preventive strategies to alleviate the problem.
本研究系统回顾了关于经济增长对身体活动(PA)和久坐行为影响的科学证据。
从电子书目数据库建立之初至2021年11月,在PubMed、科学网、考克兰图书馆、Scopus和EBSCO中进行了关键词和参考文献检索。符合以下所有标准的研究纳入本综述:(1)研究设计:观察性研究;(2)研究对象:所有年龄段的人群;(3)暴露因素:宏观经济增长;(4)结局指标:PA或久坐行为/久坐时间。
共识别出15项研究。12项研究中的8项发现经济增长与至少一个PA领域/测量指标呈正相关,而其余4项发现呈负相关。两项研究中有一项考察了经济增长与身体不活动之间的关联,发现呈正相关,而另一项未发现显著关联。四项研究考察了经济增长与久坐行为之间的关联,结果尚无定论。经济增长对PA的影响通过三个主要途径——(a)建设和维护公园及绿地,(b)采用现代工作场所和高科技,以及(c)机动化交通。
在发达国家,建设和维护公园及绿地可有效促进休闲时间身体活动和积极通勤,而在发展中国家,可优先促进与工作场所和交通相关的PA。未来研究需要纵向研究设计,并进一步探索宏观环境因素。应让政策制定者和利益相关者了解经济增长可能导致的PA减少情况,并制定预防策略以缓解该问题。