Suppr超能文献

根据LESS-CHRON和STOPPFrail标准评估的多重疾病患者中潜在不适当用药的患病率。

Prevalence of Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Patients With Multimorbidity According to LESS-CHRON and STOPPFrail Criteria.

作者信息

Mejías-Trueba Marta, Rodríguez-Pérez Aitana, Sotillo-Sánchez Irene, Sánchez-Fidalgo Susana, Nieto-Martin Maria Dolores, García-Cabrera Emilio

机构信息

Pharmacy Clinical Management Unit, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Sevilla, Spain.

Pharmacy Clinical Management Unit, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Sevilla, Spain.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Apr;24(4):511-516.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.12.013. Epub 2023 Jan 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

LESS-CHRON (List of Evidence-Based Deprescribing for Chronic Patients) and STOPPFrail (Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions in Frail adults with limited life expectancy) are criterion-based deprescribing tools. This study aimed to identify the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) with these tools in an outpatient, polymedicated, older population with multimorbidity.

DESIGN

Single-center cross-sectional observational study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

PIMs and criteria subject to deprescribing identified by each tool were collected in patients who were being followed up on outpatient internal medicine consultation.

METHODS

PIMs were identified by STOPPFrail and LESS-CHRON criteria reviewing medical histories and pharmacologic treatments of the patients in the electronic health card system. Sociodemographic, clinical, and pharmacologic variables were recorded. A correlation analysis between treatment tools and clinical values was performed using the nonparametric Spearman rho correlation.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients with a median of 14.4 (interquartile range 12-17) prescribed drugs were included. The total number of PIMs identified with LESS-CHRON was 158 vs 127 with STOPPFrail. Eight of the 27 criteria (29.6%) for LESS-CHRON and 15 of the 25 for STOPPFrail were found to be not applicable. A significant correlation was obtained for both tools with the number of prescribed drugs at the time of inclusion. The Profund, Barthel, and Frail-VIG index only showed a significant correlation with LESS-CHRON.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Both tools have shown the capacity to identify PIMs that can be deprescribed in the population studied. However, LESS-CHRON appears to have a greater detection potential in the subgroup of patients analyzed. STOPPFrail brings a certain complementarity in other areas of therapy not covered by LESS-CHRON.

摘要

目的

LESS-CHRON(慢性病患者循证减药清单)和STOPPFrail(预期寿命有限的体弱成年人老年人处方筛查工具)是基于标准的减药工具。本研究旨在使用这些工具确定门诊多病共存的多药治疗老年人群中潜在不适当用药(PIM)的患病率。

设计

单中心横断面观察性研究。

设置与参与者

在接受门诊内科会诊随访的患者中收集每种工具确定的需减药的PIM及标准。

方法

通过STOPPFrail和LESS-CHRON标准在电子健康卡系统中审查患者的病史和药物治疗来确定PIM。记录社会人口统计学、临床和药理学变量。使用非参数Spearman秩相关对治疗工具与临床值之间进行相关性分析。

结果

纳入了83例患者,他们的处方药物中位数为14.4(四分位间距12 - 17)。LESS-CHRON确定的PIM总数为158种,而STOPPFrail为127种。发现LESS-CHRON的27条标准中有8条(29.6%)和STOPPFrail的25条标准中有15条不适用。两种工具与纳入时的处方药物数量均存在显著相关性。Profund、Barthel和Frail-VIG指数仅与LESS-CHRON显示出显著相关性。

结论与启示

两种工具均显示出能够识别在所研究人群中可减药的PIM的能力。然而,LESS-CHRON在分析的患者亚组中似乎具有更大的检测潜力。STOPPFrail在LESS-CHRON未涵盖的其他治疗领域具有一定的互补性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验