Suppr超能文献

12名医生对STOPPFrail(预期寿命有限的体弱成年人老年人处方筛查工具)标准的评分者间信度。

Inter-rater reliability of STOPPFrail [Screening Tool of Older Persons Prescriptions in Frail adults with limited life expectancy] criteria amongst 12 physicians.

作者信息

Lavan Amanda Hanora, Gallagher Paul, O'Mahony Denis

机构信息

Department of Geriatric Medicine, Cork University Hospital, Wilton, Cork, T12 DC4A, Ireland.

Department of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Mar;74(3):331-338. doi: 10.1007/s00228-017-2376-2. Epub 2017 Nov 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

STOPPFrail is an explicit tool, developed by Delphi consensus, to assist physicians with deprescribing medications in frail older adults with poor survival prognosis. This study aimed to determine the inter-rater reliability (IRR), amongst physicians, of STOPPFrail application.

METHODS

Twenty clinical cases were collated to represent frail older patients. Eighteen cases met STOPPFrail inclusion criteria. They had a mean age of 79.5 (SD6) years and a median of 7 (IQR6-8.25) comorbidities and were prescribed a median of 9 (IQR7.75-11.25) medications. Two of the STOPPFrail originators reached complete agreement (gold standard) in determining 91 of 165 medications (55.2%) as inappropriate. Twelve physicians (6 geriatricians, 3 general practitioners and 3 palliative care physicians) independently applied STOPPFrail criteria. IRR between physicians and gold standard (GS) assessment was determined using Cohen's kappa statistic.

RESULTS

Eighteen of the 20 cases that met STOPPFrail inclusion criteria were correctly identified by 9 of 12 physicians (75%). The average time taken per clinical case was 2.7 (SD0.94) minutes. The kappa co-efficient between physicians and GS assessment ranged from 0.71 (substantial) to 0.86 (good), with a mean kappa value of 0.758 (SD0.059). The Fleiss kappa coefficients between GS assessment and geriatricians, GPs and palliative care physicians were 0.80 (SD0.6), 0.77 (SD0.9) and 0.75 (SD0.1), respectively. No significant difference was noted, between groups or between participants within groups, as determined by one-way ANOVA, (df (2, 9) = 0.712, p = 0.516).

CONCLUSIONS

IRR of STOPPFrail criteria between physicians, practising in different specialties, is substantial, despite no prior knowledge of the criteria.

摘要

目的

STOPPFrail是一种通过德尔菲共识法开发的明确工具,用于协助医生为生存预后较差的体弱老年人减少用药。本研究旨在确定医生之间应用STOPPFrail的评分者间信度(IRR)。

方法

整理了20个临床病例以代表体弱老年患者。其中18个病例符合STOPPFrail纳入标准。他们的平均年龄为79.5(标准差6)岁,合并症中位数为7(四分位间距6 - 8.25),所开药物中位数为9(四分位间距7.75 - 11.25)种。两位STOPPFrail的发起者在确定165种药物中的91种(55.2%)不适用方面达成了完全一致(金标准)。12名医生(6名老年病科医生、3名全科医生和3名姑息治疗医生)独立应用STOPPFrail标准。使用科恩kappa统计量确定医生与金标准(GS)评估之间的IRR。

结果

12名医生中的9名(75%)正确识别了符合STOPPFrail纳入标准的20个病例中的18个。每个临床病例平均用时2.7(标准差0.94)分钟。医生与GS评估之间的kappa系数范围为0.71(高度一致)至0.86(良好一致),平均kappa值为0.758(标准差0.059)。GS评估与老年病科医生、全科医生和姑息治疗医生之间的Fleiss kappa系数分别为0.80(标准差0.6)、0.77(标准差0.9)和0.75(标准差0.1)。单因素方差分析确定,组间或组内参与者之间均未观察到显著差异,(自由度(2, 9) = 0.712,p = 0.516)。

结论

尽管医生之前不了解STOPPFrail标准,但不同专业的医生应用该标准的IRR较高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验