Department of Psychology, PAVeA Laboratory (EA 2114), University of Tours, 37041 Tours, France.
Research Centre, Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3W 1W5, Canada.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 31;20(1):762. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010762.
The application of interventions to enhance mobility in ecological settings remain understudied. This study was developed to evaluate the feasibility of training methods in a community centre and to evaluate their impact on mobility outcomes. Fifty-four participants were randomized to one of three 12-week training programs (three times/week): aerobic (AE), gross motor abilities (GMA) or cognitive (COG). Feasibility was evaluated by calculating adherence, feedback from participants and long-term participation. The impact of these interventions on mobility was assessed by comparing pre- and post-program on Timed-up-and-go (TUG) and spontaneous walking speed (SWS) performances. Results showed relatively high rates of adherence (85.1%) and long-term participation (66.7%), along with favorable feedbacks. SWS significantly improved in COG (0.10 ± 0.11 m.s; = 0.004) and AE (0.06 ± 0.11 m.s; = 0.017) groups, and TUG performance was maintained in all groups. Results of this feasibility study demonstrated successful implementation of physical and cognitive training programs, encouraging the development of real-world applications.
在生态环境中应用干预措施来提高移动能力的研究还很少。本研究旨在评估在社区中心进行训练方法的可行性,并评估其对移动能力结果的影响。54 名参与者被随机分配到三个为期 12 周的训练项目(每周三次):有氧运动(AE)、大运动能力(GMA)或认知(COG)。通过计算依从性、参与者的反馈和长期参与来评估可行性。通过比较 TUG 和自发行走速度(SWS)的前后程序评估这些干预措施对移动能力的影响。结果表明,依从率(85.1%)和长期参与率(66.7%)相对较高,同时也获得了有利的反馈。SWS 在 COG(0.10 ± 0.11 m.s; = 0.004)和 AE(0.06 ± 0.11 m.s; = 0.017)组中显著改善,所有组的 TUG 表现均得到维持。这项可行性研究的结果表明,身体和认知训练项目的实施取得了成功,为现实世界的应用开辟了道路。