Suppr超能文献

预期困难气道插管的首次成功率及所需尝试次数:麦金托什喉镜与可视喉镜的比较

First-pass Success Rate and Number of Attempts Required for Intubation in Anticipated Difficult Airway: Comparison between Macintosh and Channeled King Vision Video Laryngoscopes.

作者信息

Raja Rameez, Gupta Sunana, Mehta Nandita, Attal Prerna

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, GMC, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.

Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Vijaypur, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India.

出版信息

Anesth Essays Res. 2022 Jul-Sep;16(3):340-344. doi: 10.4103/aer.aer_68_22. Epub 2022 Oct 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Video laryngoscopy has been shown to improvise Cormack-Lehane grading and rate of successful tracheal intubation and is now incorporated in most of the difficult airway guidelines. Since there is scarce literature regarding the use of channeled blade of King Vision video laryngoscope (KVVL) in anticipated difficult intubation, we planned to undertake this randomized control trial to assess the performance of channeled blade of KVVL and Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with anticipated difficult intubation.

DESIGN AND SETTING

This prospective randomized study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned equally to the KVVL group or Macintosh group. The primary outcome of the study was intubation success in the first attempt and number of attempts required for intubation, and the secondary outcomes were Cormack-Lehane grading and time required to intubate in both the groups.

RESULTS

The first-pass success of intubation was 88.6% in the KVVL group and 76.5% in the Macintosh group ( = 0.035). The second attempt of intubation was required in 11.4% and 20.6% of patients in the KVVL and Macintosh groups, respectively. Cormack Lehane Grade I was achieved in 100% of patients of the KVVL group as compared to 29.4% of patients in the Macintosh group. Moreover, the difference was statistically significant ( = 0.035). The mean duration of intubation was prolonged in the KVVL group as compared to the Macintosh group, and the difference was statistically significant ( = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The channeled blade of KVVL had a higher first-pass success rate and required fewer attempts to intubate when used in patients with anticipated difficult intubation. Further, the KVVL was found to be significantly better than the Macintosh laryngoscope in terms of Cormack-Lehane grading, but the time taken to intubate the trachea was more in the KVVL group.

摘要

背景与目的

视频喉镜已被证明可改善科马克-莱汉内分级以及气管插管成功率,目前已被纳入大多数困难气道指南。由于关于可视喉镜(KVVL)的可通导叶片在预计困难插管中的应用的文献较少,我们计划开展这项随机对照试验,以评估KVVL的可通导叶片和麦金托什喉镜在预计困难插管患者中的性能。

设计与地点

这项前瞻性随机研究在一家三级护理医院进行。

材料与方法

符合纳入标准的患者被随机等分为KVVL组或麦金托什组。该研究的主要结局是首次插管成功及插管所需的尝试次数,次要结局是两组的科马克-莱汉内分级及插管所需时间。

结果

KVVL组插管首次成功率为88.6%,麦金托什组为76.5%(P = 0.035)。KVVL组和麦金托什组分别有11.4%和20.6%的患者需要进行第二次插管尝试。KVVL组100%的患者达到科马克-莱汉内I级,而麦金托什组为29.4%。此外,差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.035)。与麦金托什组相比,KVVL组的平均插管持续时间延长,差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.04)。

结论

对于预计困难插管的患者,使用KVVL的可通导叶片时首次插管成功率更高,且插管所需尝试次数更少。此外,在科马克-莱汉内分级方面,发现KVVL明显优于麦金托什喉镜,但KVVL组气管插管所需时间更长。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4b1/9813986/7e2fed2594ba/AER-16-340-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验