Suppr超能文献

手势的社会认知维度。

The social cognitive dimension of pantomime.

机构信息

Unité de Recherche Étude des Mécanismes Cognitifs, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France; Institut Universitaire de France, Paris, France.

Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon (CRNL), Trajectoires Team (Inserm UMR_S 1028-CNRS-UMR 5292-Université de Lyon), Bron, France; Mouvement et Handicap and Neuro-Immersion, Hospices Civils de Lyon et Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, Hôpital Henry Gabrielle, St Genis Laval, France.

出版信息

Brain Cogn. 2023 Mar;166:105942. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2022.105942. Epub 2023 Jan 6.

Abstract

Pantomime production is commonly interpreted as reflecting tool-use-related cognitive processes. Yet, in everyday life, pantomime deserves a communication function and the exaggeration of amplitude found during pantomime compared to real tool use may reflect the individual's attempt to communicate the intended gesture. Therefore, the question arises about whether pantomime is a communicative behavior that is nevertheless supported only by non-social cognitive processes. We contribute to answering this question by using kinematic analyses. Participants performed the pantomime of using a saw or a hammer from visual presentation in three conditions: Free (no specific instructions), Self (focus on the real tool-use action), and Others (focus on the communicative dimension). Finally, they used the tool with the corresponding object (Actual condition). Participants' social cognition were assessed using gold standard questionnaires. Our results indicated that the manipulation of instructions had a minor effect on the exaggeration of amplitude during pantomime. We reported a link between the social cognition score and the amplitude in the Others condition for the hammer, which suggests that social cognitive processes could take part in pantomime production in some conditions. Nevertheless, this result does not alter our conclusion that social cognitive processes might be far from necessary for pantomime production.

摘要

哑剧通常被解释为反映与工具使用相关的认知过程。然而,在日常生活中,哑剧具有交流功能,与实际使用工具相比,哑剧中发现的幅度夸张可能反映了个体试图传达预期的手势。因此,出现了这样一个问题,即哑剧是否是一种交际行为,但仅由非社会认知过程支持。我们通过运动学分析来回答这个问题。参与者在三种条件下从视觉呈现中进行锯或锤子的哑剧表演:自由(没有具体指示)、自我(关注真实的工具使用动作)和他人(关注交际维度)。最后,他们用相应的物体使用工具(实际条件)。参与者的社会认知通过黄金标准问卷进行评估。我们的结果表明,指令的操纵对哑剧表演中幅度的夸张影响较小。我们报告了在锤子的他人条件下,社会认知得分与幅度之间的联系,这表明社会认知过程可能在某些条件下参与哑剧制作。然而,这一结果并没有改变我们的结论,即社会认知过程对于哑剧制作来说可能远非必要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验