Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany; Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Centre Juelich, Germany.
Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany; Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Centre Juelich, Germany.
Cortex. 2022 Nov;156:13-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.06.018. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
A key question in apraxia research is which specific cognitive processes in pantomiming the parietal cortex supports. The manipulation-based hypothesis and the technical-reasoning hypothesis ascribe different roles to the inferior parietal lobule (IPL).
We elucidated the role of the left supramarginal gyrus (SMG, i.e., part of IPL) during the processing of different aspects of object-use pantomime.
Thirty-one healthy participants matched pantomimes with the corresponding object (PO) or the corresponding situation (PS) during online transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) interference applied to left SMG, compared to a control stimulation (vertex). Notably, the object corresponding to a given pantomime was explicitly not shown in the PS task, excluding the possibility to analyse a physical object. Matching an object to the corresponding situation (OS) served as a control task.
TMS interference with left SMG significantly affected response times for both investigated pantomime tasks (PO and PS); the effect in the PO task significantly correlated with that in the PS task. As expected, no TMS effect was observed in the control task (OS).
Left SMG does not only establish a link between pantomime and a manipulable object but is also involved in pantomime recognition and comprehension. That TMS interfered with both pantomime tasks supports the manipulation-based hypothesis, assuming that the IPL recruits stored gesture engrams whenever pantomimes are processed.
在失用症研究中,一个关键问题是顶叶皮层支持哪种特定的认知过程。基于操作的假说和技术推理假说赋予了下顶叶(IPL)不同的角色。
我们阐明了左缘上回(SMG,即 IPL 的一部分)在处理不同方面的物体使用手势模拟过程中的作用。
31 名健康参与者在左 SMG 接受在线经颅磁刺激(TMS)干扰时,与匹配对象(PO)或相应情况(PS)的手势进行匹配,与对照刺激(顶点)进行比较。值得注意的是,在 PS 任务中,明确没有显示与给定手势对应的物体,排除了分析物理物体的可能性。将物体与相应的情况(OS)匹配作为对照任务。
左 SMG 的 TMS 干扰显著影响了两种被调查的手势模拟任务(PO 和 PS)的反应时间;PO 任务中的 TMS 效应与 PS 任务中的 TMS 效应显著相关。正如预期的那样,在对照任务(OS)中没有观察到 TMS 效应。
左 SMG 不仅在手势模拟和可操作物体之间建立了联系,而且还参与了手势模拟的识别和理解。TMS 干扰了两种手势模拟任务,支持了基于操作的假说,即 IPL 会在处理手势模拟时调用存储的手势图式。