School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Int J Stroke. 2023 Jul;18(6):720-727. doi: 10.1177/17474930231151847. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
Our understanding of the relationship between frailty and stroke, beyond the acute phase of stroke, is limited. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of frailty in stroke survivors using differing methods of assessment and describe relationships with stroke outcomes.
We used data from three international population surveys (American Health and Retirement Survey/English Longitudinal Study of Ageing/Survey for Health and Retirement in Europe) of aging. Frailty status was assessed using the Fried frailty phenotype, a 40-item frailty index (FI) and the clinical frailty scale (CFS). We created estimates of frailty prevalence and assessed association of frailty with outcomes of mortality/hospital admission/recurrent stroke at 2 years follow-up using logistic regression models adjusted for age/sex. Additional analyses explored effects of adding cognitive measures to frailty assessments and of missing grip strength data.
Across 9617 stroke survivors, using the frailty phenotype, 23.8% (n = 2094) identified as frail; with CFS, 30.1% (n = 2906) were moderately or severely frail; using FI, 22.7% (n = 2147) had moderate frailty and 31.9% (n = 3021) had severe frailty. Frailty was associated with increased risk of mortality/hospitalization/recurrent stroke using all three measures. Adding cognitive variables to the FI produced minimal difference in prevalence of frailty. People with physical frailty (phenotype or CFS) plus cognitive impairment had a greater risk of mortality than people with an equivalent level of frailty but no cognitive impairment. Excluding people unable to provide grip strength underestimated frailty prevalence.
Frailty is common in stroke and associated with poor outcomes, regardless of measure used. Adding cognitive variables to frailty phenotype/CFS measures identified those at greater risk of poor outcomes. Physical and cognitive impairments in stroke survivors do not preclude frailty assessment.
我们对衰弱与中风之间的关系的了解仅限于中风的急性期,这方面的知识还很有限。本研究旨在使用不同的评估方法来评估中风幸存者衰弱的发生率,并描述其与中风结局之间的关系。
我们使用了三项国际老龄化人群调查(美国健康与退休调查/英国老龄化纵向研究/欧洲健康与退休调查)的数据。使用 Fried 衰弱表型、40 项衰弱指数(FI)和临床虚弱量表(CFS)评估衰弱状况。我们计算了衰弱的发生率,并使用调整年龄/性别后的 logistic 回归模型评估了衰弱与 2 年随访时死亡率/住院率/复发性中风的相关性。进一步的分析探索了将认知测量加入衰弱评估以及缺失握力数据的影响。
在 9617 例中风幸存者中,根据衰弱表型,有 23.8%(n=2094)被确定为衰弱;根据 CFS,30.1%(n=2906)为中度或重度衰弱;根据 FI,22.7%(n=2147)为中度衰弱,31.9%(n=3021)为重度衰弱。使用这三种方法评估,衰弱与死亡率/住院率/复发性中风的风险增加相关。将认知变量加入 FI 后,衰弱的发生率仅略有变化。与认知功能正常的同等衰弱程度的患者相比,既有身体衰弱(表型或 CFS)又有认知障碍的患者死亡率更高。排除无法提供握力数据的患者会低估衰弱的发生率。
衰弱在中风患者中很常见,与不良结局相关,无论使用哪种评估方法。将认知变量加入衰弱表型/CFS 评估可以识别出那些具有更高不良结局风险的患者。在中风幸存者中,身体和认知损伤并不会妨碍衰弱评估。