Suppr超能文献

植入式自动心脏复律除颤器用于药物难治性室性快速性心律失常。

The automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in drug-refractory ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

作者信息

Fogoros R N, Fiedler S B, Elson J J

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 1987 Nov;107(5):635-41. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-107-5-635.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of the automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in preventing sudden death in high-risk patients.

DESIGN

Nonrandomized cohort study.

SETTING

A university teaching hospital with 500 beds.

PATIENTS

Consecutive sample of 78 patients with symptomatic, sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias that were previously drug-refractory.

INTERVENTIONS

Before February 1985, patients received treatment with the defibrillator and amiodarone if they presented with loss of consciousness (group A) and amiodarone alone if they did not lose consciousness (group C). After February 1985, because the availability of the defibrillator was severely curtailed, patients who lost consciousness received treatment with amiodarone alone (group B).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The risk for recurrent arrhythmias was similar between groups. The actuarial risk for sudden death in group B was 31% (95% confidence interval, 11% to 51%) at 1 and 2 years, a value that was significantly higher than that for group A (p less than 0.003) or group C (p less than 0.03). The risk for dying suddenly with the first recurrence was 0.78 in group B, a value that was significantly higher than that for group A (p less than 0.003) or group C (p less than 0.002).

CONCLUSION

The defibrillator is highly effective in preventing sudden death in patients whose presenting arrhythmias caused loss of consciousness (group A). In patients whose presenting arrhythmias did not result in loss of consciousness (group C), initial treatment with the defibrillator appears unnecessary.

摘要

研究目的

评估植入式自动心脏复律除颤器对高危患者预防猝死的疗效。

设计

非随机队列研究。

地点

一家拥有500张床位的大学教学医院。

患者

连续选取78例有症状的持续性室性心律失常且既往药物治疗无效的患者。

干预措施

1985年2月之前,出现意识丧失的患者接受除颤器和胺碘酮治疗(A组),未出现意识丧失的患者仅接受胺碘酮治疗(C组)。1985年2月之后,由于除颤器的可用性严重受限,出现意识丧失的患者仅接受胺碘酮治疗(B组)。

测量指标及主要结果

各组间心律失常复发风险相似。B组1年和2年时猝死的精算风险为31%(95%置信区间,11%至51%),该值显著高于A组(p<0.003)或C组(p<0.03)。B组首次复发时猝死风险为0.78,该值显著高于A组(p<0.003)或C组(p<0.002)。

结论

对于首发心律失常导致意识丧失的患者(A组),除颤器在预防猝死方面非常有效。对于首发心律失常未导致意识丧失的患者(C组),初始使用除颤器治疗似乎没有必要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验