Taylor F J
Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1979 Apr 11;204(1155):267-86. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1979.0027.
Wallin (1927) first published the notion that the fusion of bacteria with host cells was the principal source of genetic novelty for speciation. He suggested that mitochondria are transitional elements in this process. While the significance that he attributed to symbiosis now seem excessive, he was one of the first authors to be aware of the evolutionary potential of symbiotic events and his view of mitochondria may not seem strange to many cell biologist today. The most significant evolutionary development which has been attributed to intracellular symbiosis is the origin of eukaryotic cellular organization. The current status of the 'serial endosymbiosis hypothesis' is briefly review. The case for the symbiotic origin of the chloroplast, based principally on 16 S RNA oligonucleotide cataloguing, is very strong. Mitochondrial origins are more obscure but also appear to be symbiotic due to recent 18 S cataloguing from wheat embryos. The probablility of the multiple origin of some eukaryotic organelles is also examined, the processes in question being the acquisition of distinct stocks of chloroplasts from disparate photosynthetic prokaryotes and the secondary donation of organelles from degenerate eukaryotic endosymbionts to their hosts, with specific reference to the dinoflagellates Peridinium balticum, Kryptoperidinium foliaceum and the ciliate Mesodinium rubrum. It is concluded that the evolutionary potential of intracellular symbiosis ('cytobiosis': a term introduced in this paper) is great, with the best established influence being on the origin of eukaryotic chloroplasts. Together with the potential effects of viral vectors, symbiosis serves as a supplementary speciation mechanism capable of producing directed evolutionary changes. It is likely that these processes will explain some of the apparent anomalies in evolutionary rates and direction which are not readily explicable by the conventional synthetic theory of evolution.
瓦林(1927年)首次提出细菌与宿主细胞融合是物种形成过程中遗传新奇性的主要来源这一观点。他认为线粒体是这一过程中的过渡性元素。虽然他赋予共生的重要性如今看来有些过度,但他是最早意识到共生事件进化潜力的作者之一,而他对于线粒体的观点在如今许多细胞生物学家看来可能并不奇怪。细胞内共生被认为带来的最重大的进化发展是真核细胞组织的起源。本文简要回顾了“连续内共生假说”的现状。基于16S RNA寡核苷酸编目,叶绿体共生起源的证据非常充分。线粒体的起源则更为模糊,但由于最近从小麦胚胎中进行的18S编目,其似乎也源于共生。本文还探讨了一些真核细胞器多起源的可能性,涉及的过程包括从不同光合原核生物获取不同的叶绿体种群,以及退化的真核内共生体将细胞器二次捐赠给其宿主,特别提到了波罗的海多甲藻、叶状隐甲藻和红色中缢虫。结论是细胞内共生(“细胞共生”:本文引入的术语)的进化潜力巨大,其最确凿的影响在于真核叶绿体的起源。与病毒载体的潜在作用一起,共生作为一种补充性的物种形成机制,能够产生定向的进化变化。这些过程很可能会解释一些进化速率和方向上明显的异常现象,而传统的综合进化理论难以轻易解释这些现象。