Suppr超能文献

五十年后的生理学、厌氧菌与有丝分裂细胞的起源

Physiology, anaerobes, and the origin of mitosing cells 50 years on.

作者信息

Martin William F

机构信息

Institute for Molecular Evolution, University of Düsseldorf, Universitätsstr. 1, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

J Theor Biol. 2017 Dec 7;434:2-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Jan 11.

Abstract

Endosymbiotic theory posits that some organelles or structures of eukaryotic cells stem from free-living prokaryotes that became endosymbionts within a host cell. Endosymbiosis has a long and turbulent history of controversy and debate going back over 100 years. The 1967 paper by Lynn Sagan (later Lynn Margulis) forced a reluctant field to take endosymbiotic theory seriously and to incorporate it into the fabric of evolutionary thinking. Margulis envisaged three cellular partners associating in series at eukaryotic origin: the host (an engulfing bacterium), the mitochondrion (a respiring bacterium), and the flagellum (a spirochaete), with lineages descended from that flagellated eukaryote subsequently acquiring plastids from cyanobacteria, but on multiple different occasions in her 1967 account. Today, the endosymbiotic origin of mitochondria and plastids (each single events, the data now say) is uncontested textbook knowledge. The host has been more elusive, recent findings identifying it as a member of the archaea, not as a sister group of the archaea. Margulis's proposal for a spirochaete origin of flagellae was abandoned by everyone except her, because no data ever came around to support the idea. Her 1967 proposal that mitochondria and plastids arose from different endosymbionts was novel. The paper presented an appealing narrative that linked the origin of mitochondria with oxygen in Earth history: cyanobacteria make oxygen, oxygen starts accumulating in the atmosphere about 2.4 billion years ago, oxygen begets oxygen-respiring bacteria that become mitochondria via symbiosis, followed by later (numerous) multiple, independent symbioses involving cyanobacteria that brought photosynthesis to eukaryotes. With the focus on oxygen, Margulis's account of eukaryote origin was however unprepared to accommodate the discovery of mitochondria in eukaryotic anaerobes. Today's oxygen narrative has it that the oceans were anoxic up until about 580 million years ago, while the atmosphere attained modern oxygen levels only about 400 million years ago. Since eukaryotes are roughly 1.6 billion years old, much of eukaryotic evolution took place in low oxygen environments, readily explaining the persistence across eukaryotic supergroups of eukaryotic anaerobes and anaerobic mitochondria at the focus of endosymbiotic theories that came after the 1967 paper.

摘要

内共生理论认为,真核细胞的一些细胞器或结构起源于自由生活的原核生物,这些原核生物在宿主细胞内成为内共生体。内共生有着长达100多年充满争议和辩论的动荡历史。林恩·萨根(后来的林恩·马古利斯)1967年发表的论文迫使这个勉强的领域认真对待内共生理论,并将其纳入进化思想的框架。马古利斯设想在真核生物起源时三个细胞伙伴串联在一起:宿主(一种吞噬细菌)、线粒体(一种进行呼吸作用的细菌)和鞭毛(一种螺旋体),从那个有鞭毛的真核生物衍生而来的谱系随后从蓝细菌获得质体,但在她1967年的描述中有多次不同的情况。如今,线粒体和质体的内共生起源(现在数据表明都是单一事件)已是无可争议的教科书知识。宿主则更难以捉摸,最近的研究发现将其确定为古菌的一个成员,而不是古菌的姐妹群。除了马古利斯本人,其他人都放弃了她关于鞭毛起源于螺旋体的提议,因为一直没有数据支持这一观点。她1967年提出的线粒体和质体起源于不同内共生体的提议是新颖的。这篇论文提出了一个引人入胜的叙述,将线粒体的起源与地球历史上的氧气联系起来:蓝细菌产生氧气,大约24亿年前氧气开始在大气中积累,氧气催生了进行有氧呼吸的细菌,这些细菌通过共生变成线粒体,随后(多次)发生涉及蓝细菌的多个独立共生事件,将光合作用带给了真核生物。然而,由于关注氧气,马古利斯关于真核生物起源的叙述无法解释在真核厌氧生物中发现线粒体的情况。如今关于氧气的说法是,直到大约5.8亿年前海洋都是缺氧的,而大气直到大约4亿年前才达到现代氧气水平。由于真核生物大约有16亿年的历史,真核生物的大部分进化是在低氧环境中发生的,这很容易解释在1967年那篇论文之后出现的内共生理论所关注的真核厌氧生物和厌氧线粒体在真核超群中的持续存在。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验