Takasaki Hiroshi, Ueno Takahiro
Department of Physical Therapy, Saitama Prefectural University: 820 Sannomiya, Koshigaya-shi, Saitama 343-8540, Japan.
Koshigaya Rehabilitation Care Center, Japan.
J Phys Ther Sci. 2023 Jan;35(1):31-39. doi: 10.1589/jpts.35.31. Epub 2023 Jan 1.
[Purpose] We aimed to identify possible solutions to enhance evidence-based practice (EBP) in rehabilitation professionals in Japan. [Participants and Methods] A three-round Delphi method was undertaken among a cohort of clinical therapists (328 physical therapists, 55 occupational therapists, and 6 speech therapists). In the first round, the participants listed possible solutions for promoting EBP, other than 12 solutions presented in a previous study; subsequently, a new list was created. In the second round, a newly-created list of solutions was presented, and the participants responded on a 5-point Likert scale on how much they agreed with the solutions promoting EBP in Japanese rehabilitation professionals. In the third round, the distribution of responses obtained in the second round was presented, and participant's agreement was again assessed on a 5-point Likert scale. [Results] Across the three rounds, data were collected from 33.7% to 47.0% of all eligible participants. After the first round, 17 possible solutions were developed, and a list of 29 solutions was used in the second round. After the third round, 10 solutions reached the predetermined criteria for consensus. [Conclusion] In this study, ten possible solutions to promote EBP were proposed by the Japanese rehabilitation professionals.
[目的]我们旨在确定增强日本康复专业人员循证实践（EBP）的可能解决方案。[参与者与方法]对一组临床治疗师（328名物理治疗师、55名职业治疗师和6名言语治疗师）采用三轮德尔菲法。在第一轮中，参与者列出了除先前研究中提出的12种解决方案之外促进循证实践的可能解决方案；随后，创建了一个新列表。在第二轮中，展示了新创建的解决方案列表，参与者以5点李克特量表对他们对促进日本康复专业人员循证实践的解决方案的同意程度进行回应。在第三轮中，展示了第二轮获得的回应分布情况，并再次以5点李克特量表评估参与者的同意程度。[结果]在三轮中，收集了所有符合条件参与者的33.7%至47.0%的数据。第一轮后，制定了17种可能的解决方案，第二轮使用了29种解决方案的列表。第三轮后，10种解决方案达到了预定的共识标准。[结论]在本研究中，日本康复专业人员提出了10种促进循证实践的可能解决方案。
