Heinz College, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
Business School, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Am Econ Rev. 2016 Nov;106(11):3521-57. doi: 10.1257/aer.20121532.
Choice in public services is controversial. We exploit a reform in the English National Health Service to assess the effect of removing constraints on patient choice. We estimate a demand model that explicitly captures the removal of the choice constraints imposed on patients. We find that, post-removal, patients became more responsive to clinical quality. This led to a modest reduction in mortality and a substantial increase in patient welfare. The elasticity of demand faced by hospitals increased substantially post- reform and we find evidence that hospitals responded to the enhanced incentives by improving quality. This suggests greater choice can raise quality.
公共服务中的选择颇具争议。我们利用英国国民保健制度(NHS)的一项改革,评估解除对患者选择限制的效果。我们构建了一个需求模型,明确捕捉到对患者选择限制的解除。我们发现,限制解除后,患者对临床质量的反应更加灵敏。这导致死亡率略有下降,患者福利大幅提高。改革后医院面临的需求弹性大幅增加,我们有证据表明,医院通过提高质量来应对激励措施的增强。这表明更多的选择可以提高质量。