Suppr超能文献

在学校中实施青少年健康和福利项目:来自混合方法和多信息源研究的见解。

Implementing Adolescent Wellbeing and Health Programs in Schools: Insights from a Mixed Methods and Multiple Informant Study.

机构信息

Department of Human Development and Family Studies and Family Resiliency Center, College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences; Department of Biomedical and Translational Sciences, Carle Illinois College of Medicine, The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.

Evaluation Services Center, College of Education, Criminal Justice, & Human Services, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

出版信息

Prev Sci. 2023 May;24(4):663-675. doi: 10.1007/s11121-022-01481-2. Epub 2023 Jan 11.

Abstract

Determining the factors that influence implementation of school-based wellbeing and health programs is essential for achieving desired program effects. Using a convergent mixed-methods, multiple informant design, this study considered factors that influence implementation of health programs for ninth grade students and in what ways implementation is differentially perceived by multiple informants (i.e., participants, instructors, and independent observers). Two types of programs-mindfulness and health education-were implemented with ninth graders (N = 70) in three schools situated in low-resourced urban neighborhoods. Study outcomes were derived from four data sources: (1) focus group participants (N = 45); (2) program instructor fidelity ratings; (3) independent observer fidelity ratings and notes; and (4) instructor open-ended session responses. Using thematic and mixed methods integration analyses, we identified themes related to implementation promoting or challenging factors. Theme names differed when data sources were separately analyzed by informant. Mixed methods integration analysis indicated that four themes were common across all informant groups: (1) competent, attentive, and engaging instructors are essential; (2) programs should involve interactive components (e.g., physical activities, applied learning opportunities); (3) adequate time for program delivery is key for student exposure and engagement; and (4) students' availability and preferences should guide program scheduling. A fifth theme, unique to instructor and observer perspectives, was that program implementation was negatively impacted by distractions from multiple sources, including instructors, students, and settings. Recommendations from students, instructors, and observers for implementation optimization are discussed.

摘要

确定影响基于学校的幸福感和健康计划实施的因素对于实现预期的计划效果至关重要。本研究采用收敛混合方法、多信息源设计,考虑了影响九年级学生健康计划实施的因素,以及多信息源(即参与者、教师和独立观察员)对实施情况的看法有何不同。两种类型的项目——正念和健康教育——在位于资源匮乏的城市社区的三所学校中与九年级学生一起实施(N=70)。研究结果来自四个数据源:(1)焦点小组参与者(N=45);(2)计划教师保真度评分;(3)独立观察员保真度评分和笔记;(4)教师开放式会议回复。通过主题和混合方法综合分析,我们确定了与实施促进或挑战因素相关的主题。当按信息源分别分析数据来源时,主题名称不同。混合方法综合分析表明,所有信息源组都有四个共同的主题:(1)有能力、专注和有吸引力的教师是必不可少的;(2)计划应包括互动组件(例如,体育活动、应用学习机会);(3)充足的计划实施时间对于学生的参与和投入至关重要;(4)学生的可用性和偏好应指导计划安排。一个独特的主题,仅来自教师和观察员的观点,是计划实施受到多种来源的干扰,包括教师、学生和环境,从而受到负面影响。讨论了学生、教师和观察员对实施优化的建议。

相似文献

4
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.学校为控制 COVID-19 疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.

本文引用的文献

6
Implementation science: What is it and why should I care?实施科学:它是什么,为什么我应该关心?
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jan;283:112376. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.04.025. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
7
Innovations in Mixed Methods Evaluations.混合方法评估的创新。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2019 Apr 1;40:423-442. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-044215. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
10
Implementers' Perspectives on Fidelity of Implementation.实施者对实施保真度的看法。
Health Promot Pract. 2017 Mar;18(2):275-282. doi: 10.1177/1524839916672815. Epub 2016 Oct 22.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验