• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床质量登记研究。

The science of clinical quality registries.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Faculty of Science, Medicine & Health, University of Wollongong, Building 41, Northfields Avenue, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.

Blacktown Hospital, Western Sydney Local Health District, 18 Blacktown Road, Blacktown, NSW 2148, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2023 Mar 1;22(2):220-225. doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvad008.

DOI:10.1093/eurjcn/zvad008
PMID:36632040
Abstract

Clinical quality registries can be a transformational tool to improve healthcare delivery. Clinical registries with an incorporated quality emphasis identify evidence-practice gaps, inform quality improvement, and provide foundational research data to examine and improve health-related outcomes. For registries to create an impact it is essential that clinicians and researchers understand historical context, importance, advantages, and key criticisms. This methodological paper highlights the skills and capabilities required to build and maintain a robust clinical quality registry. This includes key measures to ensure data security, quality control, ongoing operational components, and benchmarking of care outcomes.

摘要

临床质量登记处可以成为改善医疗服务的变革性工具。具有质量重点的临床登记处可以确定证据与实践之间的差距,为质量改进提供信息,并提供基础研究数据,以检查和改善与健康相关的结果。为了使登记处产生影响,临床医生和研究人员必须了解其历史背景、重要性、优势和主要批评。本文方法强调了建立和维护强大的临床质量登记处所需的技能和能力。其中包括确保数据安全、质量控制、持续的运营组件以及护理结果基准测试的关键措施。

相似文献

1
The science of clinical quality registries.临床质量登记研究。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2023 Mar 1;22(2):220-225. doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvad008.
2
One size fits none - a qualitative study investigating nine national quality registries' conditions for use in quality improvement, research and interaction with patients.一种尺码不适合所有人——一项定性研究,调查九个国家质量登记处用于质量改进、研究以及与患者互动的条件。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 20;18(1):802. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3621-9.
3
Consolidated quality improvements following benchmarking with cardiothoracic surgery registries-a systematic review.与心胸外科手术登记处进行基准对比后的综合质量改进——一项系统评价
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 May 1;57(5):817-825. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz330.
4
Are clinicians using routinely collected data to drive practice improvement? A cross-sectional survey.临床医生是否正在使用常规收集的数据来推动实践改进?一项横断面调查。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Oct 20;33(4). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab141.
5
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
6
The use of a cystic fibrosis patient registry to assess outcomes and improve cystic fibrosis care in Germany.利用囊性纤维化患者登记处评估结果并改善德国的囊性纤维化护理。
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2011 Nov;17(6):473-7. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e32834b6b72.
7
The Cardiovascular Quality Improvement and Care Innovation Consortium: Inception of a Multicenter Collaborative to Improve Cardiovascular Care.心血管质量改进与护理创新联盟:一个旨在改善心血管护理的多中心合作的开端。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 Jan;14(1):e006753. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006753. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
8
"Struggling with practices" - a qualitative study of factors influencing the implementation of clinical quality registries for cardiac rehabilitation in England and Denmark.“实践中的困境”——一项关于影响英格兰和丹麦心脏康复临床质量登记实施因素的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Feb 6;19(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-3940-5.
9
Knowledge and insights from a maturing international clinical quality registry.成熟的国际临床质量注册研究带来的知识和洞见。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Apr 13;29(5):964-969. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab281.
10
Evaluations of statistical methods for outlier detection when benchmarking in clinical registries: a systematic review.临床注册研究中离群值检测的统计方法评估:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 14;13(7):e069130. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069130.

引用本文的文献

1
The emerging economic evidence and methods used to evaluate clinical registries: a systematic scoping review protocol.用于评估临床注册登记的新兴经济证据和方法:一项系统综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 24;15(6):e100644. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100644.
2
Completion of registration of risk factor variables during telephone vs on-site follow-up after myocardial infarction: a nationwide observational study in 101 199 patients from contemporary clinical practice in Sweden.心肌梗死后通过电话随访与现场随访完成危险因素变量登记情况:一项对瑞典当代临床实践中101199例患者的全国性观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 7;15(1):e087881. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087881.
3
Maximising the Quality of Stroke Care: Reporting of Data Collection Methods and Resourcing in National Stroke Registries: A Systematic Review.
最大化卒中护理质量:国家卒中登记处数据收集方法和资源报告:系统评价。
J Med Syst. 2024 Oct 28;48(1):100. doi: 10.1007/s10916-024-02119-2.
4
The prototype of a frailty learning health system: The HARMONY Model.衰弱学习健康系统的原型:和谐模型。
Learn Health Syst. 2023 Nov 23;8(2):e10401. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10401. eCollection 2024 Apr.