Bugmann Harald, Seidl Rupert
Forest Ecology, Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems, Department of Environmental Systems Science ETH Zurich Zürich Switzerland.
Ecosystem Dynamics and Forest Management Technical University of Munich Freising Germany.
J Ecol. 2022 Oct;110(10):2288-2307. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.13989. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
To assess the impacts of climate change on vegetation from stand to global scales, models of forest dynamics that include tree demography are needed. Such models are now available for 50 years, but the currently existing diversity of model formulations and its evolution over time are poorly documented. This hampers systematic assessments of structural uncertainties in model-based studies.We conducted a meta-analysis of 28 models, focusing on models that were used in the past five years for climate change studies. We defined 52 model attributes in five groups (basic assumptions, growth, regeneration, mortality and soil moisture) and characterized each model according to these attributes. Analyses of model complexity and diversity included hierarchical cluster analysis and redundancy analysis.Model complexity evolved considerably over the past 50 years. Increases in complexity were largest for growth processes, while complexity of modelled establishment processes increased only moderately. Model diversity was lowest at the global scale, and highest at the landscape scale. We identified five distinct clusters of models, ranging from very simple models to models where specific attribute groups are rendered in a complex manner and models that feature high complexity across all attributes.Most models in use today are not balanced in the level of complexity with which they represent different processes. This is the result of different model purposes, but also reflects legacies in model code, modelers' preferences, and the 'prevailing spirit of the epoch'. The lack of firm theories, laws and 'first principles' in ecology provides high degrees of freedom in model development, but also results in high responsibilities for model developers and the need for rigorous model evaluation. . The currently available model diversity is beneficial: convergence in simulations of structurally different models indicates robust projections, while convergence of similar models may convey a false sense of certainty. The existing model diversity-with the exception of global models-can be exploited for improved projections based on multiple models. We strongly recommend balanced further developments of forest models that should particularly focus on establishment and mortality processes, in order to provide robust information for decisions in ecosystem management and policymaking.
为了评估气候变化对从林分到全球尺度植被的影响,需要包含树木种群统计学的森林动态模型。这类模型已有50年历史,但目前模型公式的多样性及其随时间的演变记录不足。这妨碍了基于模型的研究中对结构不确定性的系统评估。我们对28个模型进行了荟萃分析,重点关注过去五年用于气候变化研究的模型。我们在五个组(基本假设、生长、更新、死亡和土壤湿度)中定义了52个模型属性,并根据这些属性对每个模型进行了特征描述。模型复杂性和多样性分析包括层次聚类分析和冗余分析。在过去50年中,模型复杂性有了显著演变。生长过程的复杂性增加最大,而模拟建立过程的复杂性仅适度增加。模型多样性在全球尺度最低,在景观尺度最高。我们识别出五个不同的模型集群,从非常简单的模型到以复杂方式呈现特定属性组的模型,以及在所有属性上都具有高复杂性的模型。当今使用的大多数模型在表示不同过程的复杂程度上并不平衡。这是不同模型目的的结果,但也反映了模型代码的遗留问题、建模者的偏好以及“时代的主流精神”。生态学中缺乏坚实的理论、定律和“第一原理”,在模型开发中提供了高度的自由度,但也给模型开发者带来了高度的责任以及对严格模型评估的需求。目前可用的模型多样性是有益的:结构不同的模型模拟结果的趋同表明预测稳健,而相似模型的趋同可能会传达一种虚假的确定性。除全球模型外,现有的模型多样性可用于基于多个模型的改进预测。我们强烈建议对森林模型进行平衡的进一步开发,尤其应关注建立和死亡过程,以便为生态系统管理和政策制定决策提供可靠信息。