Okauchi Shinichiro, Miyazaki Kunihiko, Shiozawa Toshihiro, Satoh Hiroaki, Hizawa Nobuyuki
Division of Respiratory Medicine, Mito Medical Center, University of Tsukuba, Mito, Japan.
Division of Respiratory Medicine, Ryugasaki Saiseikai General Hospital, Ryugasaki, Japan.
Cancer Diagn Progn. 2023 Jan 3;3(1):53-60. doi: 10.21873/cdp.10179. eCollection 2023 Jan-Feb.
BACKGROUND/AIM: We performed a retrospective study too clarify whether the presence or absence of driver genes affects the relationship between thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) expression and response to pemetrexed (PEM) in non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (non-sq-NSCLC) patients.
We reviewed the medical charts of patients treated with PEM-containing chemotherapy during the period from February 2016 to February 2022 at Mito Medical Center-University of Tsukuba, Ryugasaki Saiseikai General Hospital, and University of Tsukuba Hospital.
During the period of the study, 185 driver gene-negative patients negative, and 65 driver gene-positive patients were evaluated. Among the 165 driver gene-negative patients, progression free survival (PFS) of TTF-1-expressing patients treated with PEM-containing chemotherapy was significantly longer compared to that of TTF-1-negative patients. In the analysis of 65 driver gene-positive patients, the PFS of TTF-1-positive patients treated with PEM-containing chemotherapy did not differ significantly from that of TTF-1-negative patients. There was no significant difference in PFS between driver gene-negative and driver gene-positive patients treated with PEM-containing chemotherapy. Comparison between four groups defined according to the presence of driver gene and TTF-1 expression indicated shorter PFS only in 'driver gene-negative and TTF-1-negative' patients.
In driver gene-positive non-sq NSCLC patients, expression of TTF does not affect the survival outcome of PEM-containing-chemotherapy. In other words, in these patients, second-line or later-line PEM-containing chemotherapy after development of resistance for specific-tyrosine kinase inhibitor could be expected to have the same level of efficacy as first-line PEM containing chemotherapy in driver gene-negative, TTF-1-positive non-sq NSCLC patients.
背景/目的:我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以阐明驱动基因的存在与否是否会影响非鳞状非小细胞肺癌(non-sq-NSCLC)患者中甲状腺转录因子-1(TTF-1)表达与培美曲塞(PEM)反应之间的关系。
我们回顾了2016年2月至2022年2月期间在筑波大学水户医疗中心、龙崎圣济会综合医院和筑波大学医院接受含PEM化疗的患者的病历。
在研究期间,评估了185例驱动基因阴性患者和65例驱动基因阳性患者。在165例驱动基因阴性患者中,接受含PEM化疗的TTF-1表达患者的无进展生存期(PFS)明显长于TTF-1阴性患者。在对65例驱动基因阳性患者的分析中,接受含PEM化疗的TTF-1阳性患者的PFS与TTF-1阴性患者的PFS没有显著差异。接受含PEM化疗的驱动基因阴性和驱动基因阳性患者之间的PFS没有显著差异。根据驱动基因和TTF-1表达的存在定义的四组之间的比较表明,仅在“驱动基因阴性和TTF-1阴性”患者中PFS较短。
在驱动基因阳性的non-sq NSCLC患者中,TTF的表达不影响含PEM化疗的生存结果。换句话说,在这些患者中,对特异性酪氨酸激酶抑制剂产生耐药性后进行的二线或后续含PEM化疗预期与驱动基因阴性、TTF-1阳性的non-sq NSCLC患者的一线含PEM化疗具有相同水平的疗效。