Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr;58(2):521-533. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14131. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
OBJECTIVE (STUDY QUESTION): To use systems thinking with diverse system actors to (a) characterize current problems at the intersection of chronic conditions (CCs) and reproductive health (RH) care and their determinants, (b) determine necessary system actors for change, and (c) document cross-system actions that can improve identified problems in the United States.
DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Data were collected from six groups of system actors via online focus groups.
This is a qualitative multilevel study using the iceberg systems thinking framework.
DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Data were collected by note-taking and recording six focus groups; analysis incorporated perspective triangulation using the systems thinking iceberg and system mapping to visualize interconnected system challenges, actors, and action ideas.
Participants described eight necessary system actors: health care institutions, medical leaders, medical providers, patient advocates and foundations, patients and families, payors, policy makers, and research funders. Forty pain points were identified, spread across each of the four levels of the systems thinking iceberg: undesirable outcomes (6), concerning trends (9), system structure flaws (15), and problematic mental models (10). In response to these pain points, a set of 46 action ideas was generated by participants and mapped into nine action themes: (1) adjust QI metrics, incentives, and reimbursement, (2) bolster RH medical education and training, (3) break down medical silos, (4) enrich patient education, (5) expand the health care team, (6) improve holistic health care, (7) modify research and programmatic funding to prioritize RH and CC, (8) spur innovation for patient visits, and (9) support professional champions and leaders.
By embracing system complexity, creating visual maps, and pushing participants to identify actionable strategies for improvement, this study generates a set of specific actions that can be used to address pain points across the multiple system levels that make improving reproductive care for people with CCs so challenging.
目的(研究问题):使用系统思维和多样化的系统参与者(a)描述慢性疾病(CCs)和生殖健康(RH)护理交叉点的当前问题及其决定因素,(b)确定必要的系统变革参与者,以及(c)记录可以改善美国所识别问题的跨系统行动。
资料来源/研究环境:通过在线焦点小组从六组系统参与者收集数据。
这是一项使用冰山系统思维框架的定性多层次研究。
资料收集/提取方法:通过记笔记和记录六个焦点小组收集数据;分析采用系统思维冰山的视角三角测量和系统映射,以可视化相互关联的系统挑战、参与者和行动想法。
参与者描述了八个必要的系统参与者:医疗机构、医学领导者、医疗服务提供者、患者权益倡导者和基金会、患者和家庭、支付方、政策制定者和研究资助者。确定了四十个痛点,分布在系统思维冰山的四个层次中的每一个:不良后果(6)、令人担忧的趋势(9)、系统结构缺陷(15)和有问题的心智模型(10)。针对这些痛点,参与者生成了一组 46 个行动想法,并将其映射到九个行动主题中:(1)调整质量改进指标、激励措施和报销,(2)加强 RH 医学教育和培训,(3)打破医学孤岛,(4)丰富患者教育,(5)扩大医疗团队,(6)改善整体医疗保健,(7)修改研究和计划资金,以优先考虑 RH 和 CC,(8)促进创新患者就诊,(9)支持专业冠军和领导者。
通过接受系统复杂性,创建可视化地图,并促使参与者确定可改进的策略,本研究生成了一组具体行动,可以用于解决跨越多个系统层面的痛点,这些痛点使得改善患有 CC 的人的生殖护理变得如此具有挑战性。