Paul Nina B, Strauss Gregory P, Gates-Woodyatt Jessica J, Barchard Kimberly A, Allen Daniel N
Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, 4505 S. Maryland Parkway, P. O. Box 455030, Las Vegas, NV, 89154-5030, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, USA.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2023 Dec;273(8):1715-1724. doi: 10.1007/s00406-022-01507-4. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
Recent factor analytic evidence supports both two-factor (motivation and pleasure, MAP; diminished expression, EXP) and five-factor (anhedonia, asociality, avolition, blunted affect, alogia) conceptualizations of negative symptoms. However, it is unclear whether these two conceptualizations of the latent structure of negative symptoms have differential associations with external correlates. The current study evaluated external correlates of the two- and five-factor structures by examining associations with variables known to have critical relations with negative symptoms: trait affect, defeatist performance beliefs, neurocognition, and community-based psychosocial functioning. Participants included a total of 245 outpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia who were rated on the Brief Negative Symptom Scale and completed a battery of additional measures during periods of clinical stability. These additional measures included the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, Defeatist Performance Beliefs scale, MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, and Level of Function Scale. Pearson correlations indicated differential patterns of associations between the BNSS scores and the external correlates. Support for the two-factor model was indicated by a stronger association of MAP with positive affect and psychosocial functioning, compared to EXP with neurocognition. Significance tests examining a differential magnitude of associations showed that the two-dimension negative symptom structure masked unique correlational relationships among the five negative symptom domains with neurocognition and social/vocational community functioning and captured unique patterns of correlation with trait affect. Support for the five-factor model was shown by a stronger association between Blunted Affect with Attention/Vigilance, and stronger associations between Avolition, Anhedonia, and Asociality with psychosocial functioning. Results offer support for both the two-dimension and five-domain model of negative symptoms as well as a hierarchical two-dimensions-five-domains model of negative symptoms. Findings may have implications for diagnostic criteria and descriptions of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.; DSM-5), as well as possible treatment targets of negative symptoms.
最近的因素分析证据支持阴性症状的双因素(动机与愉悦,MAP;表达减少,EXP)和五因素(快感缺失、社交退缩、意志缺乏、情感迟钝、言语贫乏)概念化。然而,目前尚不清楚阴性症状潜在结构的这两种概念化与外部相关因素之间是否存在差异关联。本研究通过考察与已知与阴性症状存在关键关系的变量之间的关联,评估了双因素和五因素结构的外部相关因素:特质情感、失败主义表现信念、神经认知以及基于社区的心理社会功能。参与者共有245名被诊断为精神分裂症的门诊患者,他们接受了简明阴性症状量表的评定,并在临床稳定期完成了一系列额外测评。这些额外测评包括正负性情绪量表、失败主义表现信念量表、MATRICS共识认知成套测验以及功能水平量表。皮尔逊相关性分析表明,简明阴性症状量表得分与外部相关因素之间存在差异关联模式。与EXP与神经认知的关联相比,MAP与积极情感和心理社会功能的更强关联表明了对双因素模型的支持。检验关联差异大小的显著性检验表明,二维阴性症状结构掩盖了五个阴性症状领域与神经认知以及社会/职业社区功能之间独特的相关关系,并捕捉到了与特质情感相关的独特模式。情感迟钝与注意力/警觉性之间更强的关联,以及意志缺乏、快感缺失和社交退缩与心理社会功能之间更强的关联,表明了对五因素模型的支持。研究结果为阴性症状的二维和五领域模型以及阴性症状的层次二维-五领域模型提供了支持。研究结果可能对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册(第5版;DSM-5)》的诊断标准和描述以及阴性症状的可能治疗靶点具有启示意义。