School of Economics and Management, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, 066004, China.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(14):41505-41536. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-25004-2. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
Under the global implementation of a low-carbon economy, the treatment of municipal plastic solid waste (PSW) has become an important task to be solved urgently. In the actual decision-making process of PSW treatment, the evaluation information is usually fuzzy, and the decision-makers (DMs) are bounded rational. For selecting the most appropriate PSW treatment technology, we propose a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method based on cumulative prospect theory and fuzzy decision-making trail and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL). Firstly, we construct the criteria system of PSW treatment that consists of 9 sub-criteria from the perspectives of environment, economy, society, and technology. Then, considering the interdependences and interactions between these evaluation criteria and allowing multiple stakeholders to participate in decision-making, we propose a fuzzy DEMATEL method to deal with the fuzziness of evaluation in the decision-making process and determine the weights of the evaluation criteria. Subsequently, taking into account the different opinions of different stakeholders and psychological factors such as risk preference and loss aversion of stakeholders, we aggregate the evaluation information of different stakeholders and develop the PSW treatment alternatives to rank the orders by using the proposed multi-actor cumulative prospect theory (CPT) method. We study seven alternative processes for PSW treatment by the developed model, including landfill, recycling, pyrolysis, incineration, and the combination of landfilling and recycling, landfill and incineration, and recycling and pyrolysis. According to the ranking results, we find the combination of recycling and incineration is the best treatment alternative. We take the seven PSW treatment technologies in Shanghai as the case study to verify the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed method. Through the sensitivity analysis and comparison analysis with fuzzy similarity to ideal solution (FTOPSIS) method and an acronym in Portuguese of the interactive and multi-criteria decision-making (TODIM) method, we illustrate the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed method. This research provides significant references for the PSW treatment technology selection problems under uncertain environments and extends the methods in the decision-making field.
在全球推行低碳经济的背景下,城市塑料固体废物(PSW)的处理已成为亟待解决的重要任务。在 PSW 处理的实际决策过程中,评价信息通常是模糊的,决策者(DMs)是有限理性的。为了选择最合适的 PSW 处理技术,我们提出了一种基于累积前景理论和模糊决策试验与评估实验室(DEMATEL)的多准则决策(MCDM)方法。首先,我们从环境、经济、社会和技术四个方面构建了 PSW 处理的评价指标体系,共包含 9 个二级指标。然后,考虑到这些评价指标之间的相互依存和相互作用,并允许多个利益相关者参与决策,我们提出了一种模糊的 DEMATEL 方法来处理决策过程中的评价模糊性,并确定评价指标的权重。随后,考虑到不同利益相关者的不同意见以及利益相关者的风险偏好和损失厌恶等心理因素,我们聚合了不同利益相关者的评价信息,并利用所提出的多主体累积前景理论(CPT)方法对 PSW 处理方案进行排序。我们通过所开发的模型研究了 PSW 处理的七种替代方案,包括填埋、回收、热解、焚烧,以及填埋和回收、填埋和焚烧、回收和热解的组合。根据排名结果,我们发现回收和焚烧的组合是最佳的处理方案。我们以上海市的七种 PSW 处理技术为例,验证了所提出方法的有效性和可行性。通过敏感性分析和与模糊相似度理想解排序法(FTOPSIS)和交互多准则决策方法(TODIM)的比较分析,说明了所提出方法的有效性和优越性。本研究为不确定环境下的 PSW 处理技术选择问题提供了重要参考,拓展了决策领域的方法。